Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

[VCheng]

*Frivolous Post Alert*

As a side note; If rightful owner of London properties couldn't be established after 1 and half year of investigation, court should take it in its custody through court order and declare, "show papers to prove the ownership and get it back"

The jurisdiction of the SC does NOT extend to London.

 

[PakSword]

Based on the above, and on the comments made by the judges during the hearing, it is safe to say that this will probably be going to a trial court. The JIT has not been able to prove any any dishonest action on behalf of Nawaz Sharif (even though everyone, even the judges, know he is a chor). This will go to an Accountability Court, under direction of the Supreme Court judges.

In my opinion, going by the book when the rest of the institutions are not doing their work is morally unacceptable. The Supreme Court needs to understand the circumstances and need justice to be seen.

Only two aspects.. that is his service in JAFZA where he has received some salary, as I pointed out in one of my earlier posts. Aijaz ul Ahsan may disqualify on this.

Also, receiving 88% of the profit from Hill Metals, meaning he is the the actual owner and Hussain Nawaz is his benamidar.. Court asked several times what is the source of capital to establish Hill Metals.. and defense didn't provide it.. Had the defense proved source of capital as anyone other than NS, judges would have given him benefit of the doubt.

Now judges will have to ascertain the ownership based on the share of profit he has received from this company so far i.e. 88%.

Benami companies ki ownership isi tarah pata lagti hai..

 

[Farah Sohail]

I went through most of the pages of the judgement. Three judges that ruled in favour of Nawaz Sharif.
EJAZ AFZAL KHAN, J Said:


In his judgement, he was firmly against using 62/63. He will not disqualify Nawaz Sharif come what may: he will send it to an Accountability Court. Unlike Justice Khosa, who thought that the Court must rise above technacilities, Justice Afzal Khan is of the view that even if the insititutions of Pakistan are corrupt, the Supreme Court should "go by the law and the book."

Justice Ijaz ul Ahsan said:


The JIT has not proved that Nawaz Sharif was the beneficial owner of the London flats. Therefore, he will not disqualify him outright.

Justice Azmat: I am unable to understand what his stance on the issue is going through his judgements. It seems he wants to refrain from using 62/63 but at the same time does not want the issue to stay unresolved.



Based on the above, and on the comments made by the judges during the hearing, it is safe to say that this will probably be going to a trial court. The JIT has not been able to prove any any dishonest action on behalf of Nawaz Sharif (even though everyone, even the judges, know he is a chor). This will go to an Accountability Court, under direction of the Supreme Court judges.

In my opinion, going by the book when the rest of the institutions are not doing their work is morally unacceptable. The Supreme Court needs to understand the circumstances and need justice to be seen.

You must read Justice Ijazul Ahsan's judgment towardsthe end..where he discusses jurisdiction of 184/3 and 62/63 .. His argument was same as tht of Justice Khosa.. He also said we have to rise above technicalities, and do complete justice

 

[QatariPrince]

OK doston! Ab verdict walay din hi dekhain gay

I am not very hopeful. Baki Allah say dua hai koi khuda ka khoof dal jaye Judges key dilon main aur in ko sahi verdict denay ki himmat mil jaye

 

[Farah Sohail]

Only two aspects.. that is his service in JAFZA where he has received some salary, as I pointed out in one of my earlier posts. Aijaz ul Ahsan may disqualify on this.

Also, receiving 88% of the profit from Hill Metals, meaning he is the the actual owner and Hussain Nawaz is his benamidar.. Court asked several times what is the source of capital to establish Hill Metals.. and defense didn't provide it.. Had the defense provided source of capital from anyone other than NS, judges would have given him benefit of the doubt.

Now judges will have to ascertain the ownership based on the share of profit he has received from this company so far i.e. 88%.

Benami companies ki ownership isi tarah pata lagti hai..

I think Justice Ijazul Ahsan will surely disqualify him.. Towards the end of his previous verdict, he discussed jurisdiction of 184/3 and 62/63.. He also said tht Article 187 gives SC the right to do complete justice and we should rise above technicalities.. Justice Khosa also used this argument

 

[ssethii]

Kuch ni hona, sirf quom ka waqt barbad kr re hain.

 

[PakSword]

I think Justice Ijazul Ahsan will surely disqualify him.. Towards the end of his previous verdict, he discussed jurisdiction of 184/3 and 62/63.. He also said tht Article 187 gives SC the right to do complete justice and we should rise above technicalities.. Justice Khosa also used this argument

Disqualify karna NS ko bari himmat ka kaam hai.. mujhay inn teenon judges main abhi tak woh himmat nazar nahi aayee TBH.. including justice Aijaz ul Ahsan. Hosakta hai woh disqualify kardain, hosakta hai nahi karain.. isi liey main ne DQ pe bhi 3-2 rakha hai..

OK doston! Ab verdict walay din hi dekhain gay

I am not very hopeful. Baki Allah say dua hai koi khuda ka khoof dal jaye Judges key dilon main aur in ko sahi verdict denay ki himmat mil jaye

I am also not very hopeful TBH.. Lekin agar hua NS disqualify tou 3-2 se hoga.. buhat mushkil se.. warna judges main woh baat nahi nazar aarahi..

 

[Farah Sohail]

Disqualify karna NS ko bari himmat ka kaam hai.. mujhay inn teenon judges main abhi tak woh himmat nazar nahi aayee TBH.. including justice Aijaz ul Ahsan. Hosakta hai woh disqualify kardain, hosakta hai nahi karain.. isi liey main ne DQ pe bhi 3-2 rakha hai..

I think Justice Ijazul Ahsan zuroor kardein ge IA.. Aaj jab Jamaat e Islami ke lawyer arguments de rahay thay ke court ne 20 april ke verdict main kaha tha ke disqualification ko consider karein ge...tu J Ijazul Ahsan said ke woh SC ka hukum tha.. Apnay hukum se peechay hatay hian, na hatein ge... I think he has made up his mind regd disqualification...

 

[Realistic Change]

What does that mean?

Means as if the first one wasn't enough (as he himself is in picture, plus his picture in the background)

------------------------------

*Frivolous Post Alert*

As a side note; If rightful owner of London properties couldn't be established after 1 and half year of investigation, court should take it in its custody through court order and declare, "show papers to prove the ownership and get it back"

The jurisdiction of the SC does NOT extend to London.

***FRIVOLOUS POST ALERT***

IT WAS A PUN INTENDED POST - SARCASM, DERISION, MOCKERY, RIDICULE, SNEERING......

 

[PakPak]

I think Justice Ijazul Ahsan zuroor kardein ge IA.. Aaj jab Jamaat e Islami ke lawyer arguments de rahay thay ke court ne 20 april ke verdict main kaha tha ke disqualification ko consider karein ge...tu J Ijazul Ahsan said ke woh SC ka hukum tha.. Apnay hukum se peechay hatay hian, na hatein ge... I think he has made up his mind regd disqualification...

I think you're the most hopeful and @Syed1. the least hopeful

I think he will be disqualified. Though Dar's case will rumble on.

 

[Farah Sohail]

I am also not very hopeful TBH.. Lekin agar hua NS disqualify tou 3-2 se hoga.. buhat mushkil se.. warna judges main woh baat nahi nazar aarahi..

Mujhe 4-1 lag raha hai.. Am counting advocate in disqualification..

Warna abt 3-2, i am sure

Aaj Ishaq Dar ki disqualification ka bhi kaha hai NB ne

Lekin agar uski disqualification ka matter discuss hua..tu phir wohi baat le kon sa bench karay ga? Ye humein suspense main hi maar dein ge.. Atleast last time, ye confusion tu nahi thee

 

[PakSword]

I think Justice Ijazul Ahsan zuroor kardein ge IA.. Aaj jab Jamaat e Islami ke lawyer arguments de rahay thay ke court ne 20 april ke verdict main kaha tha ke disqualification ko consider karein ge...tu J Ijazul Ahsan said ke woh SC ka hukum tha.. Apnay hukum se peechay hatay hian, na hatein ge... I think he has made up his mind regd disqualification...

Disqualification consider karnay main aur disqualify karnay ke beech main aik buhat oonchi deewar hai, aur uss deewar ka naam hai himmat!

 

[Farah Sohail]

I think you're the most hopeful and @Syed1. the least hopeful

I think he will be disqualified. Though Dar's case will rumble on.

I am almost sure regd J Ijazul Ahsan, tht he will disqualify and my optimism comes from his previous verdict and his recent remarks

Disqualification consider karnay main aur disqualify karnay ke beech main aik buhat oonchi deewar hai, aur uss deewar ka naam hai himmat!

Mujhe Justice Ijazul Ahsan main himmat ki kami nahi lagti warna woh itna harsh tone wala verdict na likhtay last time.. Advocate aur pakora ki tarah ka likh detay.. He only wanted to be absolute sure, before disqualifying PM..and now he has got undisputed facts from JIT report..

 

[El_Swordsmen]

chittar maroo issay ... he must be high on Ephedrine !!

 

[PakSword]

Mujhe 4-1 lag raha hai.. Am counting advocate in disqualification..

Warna abt 3-2, i am sure

Aaj Ishaq Dar ki disqualification ka bhi kaha hai NB ne

Lekin agar uski disqualification ka matter discuss hua..tu phir wohi baat le kon sa bench karay ga? Ye humein suspense main hi maar dein ge.. Atleast last time, ye confusion tu nahi thee

Ishaq Dar aik chalak chartered accountant hai..

uss ne aakhri din saaray new tax docs banwa ke dediey.. sources who have some connections with his men in SECP and FBR are telling that he has given all this record on the last day, and not before JIT, because he wanted to gain some more time.. submitting so much documentation on the last day means there is 99% chance his case will be referred to trial court. By that time, if PM is still there (and he has strong feeling that PM is not going home), he will manage the trial court.

**IF** PM is disqualified, he will runaway.

That is the reason why I said yesterday that in ISL there are strong rumors of PM getting away in this case as there are string indications that the case is being referred to trial court as per the finance minister's close friends and acquaintances.

Mujhe Justice Ijazul Ahsan main himmat ki kami nahi lagti warna woh itna harsh tone wala verdict na likhtay last time.. Advocate aur pakora ki tarah ka likh detay.. He only wanted to be absolute sure, before disqualifying PM..and now he has got undisputed facts from JIT report..

Hamara PM itna beghairat hai, ke ussay verdict main gaalian bhi de di jaein lekin disqualify na kia jaey tou woh mithai baantay..

Harsh verdict uss waqt kaam aayega jab woh disqualify karainge.. kardain tou acha hai, nahi kartay tou khud apnay aamaal ke zimmedar..