Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

[Moonlight]

Aur verdict ke baad aisa na ho...

طلسم ٹوٹتے ہی سب کھل کے سامنے آ گئے
وقت نے انہیں چھپا رکھا تھا وفا کے پردوں میں

Is se pehle ke is thread ko main bait bazi main convert Karun acha hai is ka reply sirf like se he don lol

 

[Realistic Change]

Reminds of this verse

خبر تھی لٹیروں کے سبھی ٹھکانوں کی

شریکِ جرم نہ ہوتے تو مخبری کرتے۔

@Moonlight

Next time read the above verse with this gentleman's picture in picture - picture and see how reflective it is of his state of mind.

As a side note; Kaun log hain yeh, apni solo tasweer apney hi office mein - yak (read: yuck) na shud do shud

ps: misspelling is intentional

 

[Moonlight]

Wase yeh Ch Nisar pe thora thora fit ho raha :p

 

[PakPak]

@QatariPrince what tags do you use for tweet deck?

 

[PakSword]

Sohail Warraich: PM mushkil main hain. Unhon nay JIT report ko refute hi nahi kya. Party is over

Haroon-ur-Rasheed: PM ab bach hi nahi saktay. Nawaz Sharif ka Roh-e-Zameen per naam-o-nishan nahi ho ga.

Haroon baba ka sab se best hai..

 

[expert]

------------

Acha.. If judges decide, not to give short order and announce written detailed verdict, like last time..then i am afraid, it will again be a long wait..

Justice Ijazul Ahsan also writes detailed judgment like Justice Khosa.. J Ijazul Ahsan's verdict was the most detailed, more than 200 pages..based on limited material last time.. Nw theres a lot more material in JIT..and which has been contested bgy respondents.. Many issues will have to be discussed.. As many new evidences have come.....I am sure, woh dil ki bharaas bhi bhtt nikalein ge, verdict main.. I think it will be a long wait...because a lot will have to be typed again.... I doubt..it is possible tht it can be announced in a week or two weeks as most ppl are expecting

I went through most of the pages of the judgement. Three judges that ruled in favour of Nawaz Sharif.
EJAZ AFZAL KHAN, J Said:

Many other arguments have been addressed and many other judgments have been cited at the bar by the learned ASCs for the petitioners as well as the respondents but as we have held above that the allegations leveled against respondent No. 1 require investigation by the Constitution Petition No. 29 of 2016, Constitution Petition No. 30 of 2016 & Constitution Petition No. 03 of 2017 236 investigation agency and determination by an Accountability Court, we need not comment on them at this stage lest it prejudices the case of any of the parties.

In his judgement, he was firmly against using 62/63. He will not disqualify Nawaz Sharif come what may: he will send it to an Accountability Court. Unlike Justice Khosa, who thought that the Court must rise above technacilities, Justice Afzal Khan is of the view that even if the insititutions of Pakistan are corrupt, the Supreme Court should "go by the law and the book."

Justice Ijaz ul Ahsan said:

Having come to the conclusion that in these proceedings sufficient material is not available on the record to establish that Respondent No.6 is a dependent of Respondent No.1, in a legal sense, we do not feel the necessity to discuss this aspect of the case any further, lest it should prejudice the case of either party before a competent forum if and when this issue is agitated.

The JIT has not proved that Nawaz Sharif was the beneficial owner of the London flats. Therefore, he will not disqualify him outright.

Justice Azmat: I am unable to understand what his stance on the issue is going through his judgements. It seems he wants to refrain from using 62/63 but at the same time does not want the issue to stay unresolved.

No doubt, ordinarily this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 184(3) of the Constitution tends to avoid deciding the disputed questions of facts. However, this is not an absolute rule. In exceptional circumstances, this Court on more than one occasion has undertaken such an exercise.

Based on the above, and on the comments made by the judges during the hearing, it is safe to say that this will probably be going to a trial court. The JIT has not been able to prove any any dishonest action on behalf of Nawaz Sharif (even though everyone, even the judges, know he is a chor). This will go to an Accountability Court, under direction of the Supreme Court judges.

In my opinion, going by the book when the rest of the institutions are not doing their work is morally unacceptable. The Supreme Court needs to understand the circumstances and need justice to be seen.

 

[QatariPrince]

@QatariPrince what tags do you use for tweet deck?

I have followed all news channels twitter handles.

Search queries like JIT (in Urdu English) Names of judges Panama etc

 

[PakPak]

I have followed all news channels twitter handles.

Search queries like JIT (in Urdu English) Names of judges Panama etc

Thank you!

 

[Moonlight]

yuck na shud do shud

What does that mean?

Reminds of this verse

خبر تھی لٹیروں کے سبھی ٹھکانوں کی

شریکِ جرم نہ ہوتے تو مخبری کرتے۔

@Moonlight

Next time the above verse with this gentleman's picture in picture - picture and see how reflective it is of his state of mind.

View attachment 413111

As a side note; Kaun log hain yeh, apni solo tasweer apney hi office mein - yuck na shud do shud

So accurate. I am sure this family had a meeting and asked each other to remain quiet & don't even utter a single word about this case before we get grind too

 

[ghazi52]

 

[Zibago]

So accurate. I am sure this family had a meeting and asked each other to remain quiet & don't even utter a single word about this case before we get grind too

They are planning something big Neefa Podri is now in contact with PMLN youth wing their aim is to create chaos after final verdict

Reminds of this verse

خبر تھی لٹیروں کے سبھی ٹھکانوں کی

شریکِ جرم نہ ہوتے تو مخبری کرتے۔

@Moonlight

Next time the above verse with this gentleman's picture in picture - picture and see how reflective it is of his state of mind.

View attachment 413111

As a side note; Kaun log hain yeh, apni solo tasweer apney hi office mein - yuck na shud do shud

ps: misspelling is intentional

Arey is ney to kisi ko ghasitna tha ye to khud ghisat gaya

 

[Realistic Change]

*Frivolous Post Alert*

As a side note; If rightful owner of London properties couldn't be established after 1 and half year of investigation, court should take it in its custody through court order and declare, "show papers to prove the ownership and get it back"

 

[PakSword]

They are planning something big Neefa Podri is now in contact with PMLN youth wing their aim is to create chaos after final verdict

 

[QatariPrince]

Saray Panelist hi Habib Akram ki logic per hasna shuro ho gaye hain

 

[Zibago]

Ye bongi suni thi but ye afwahein pheli hain Islamabad mein inhon ney tor phor karney ana hy