Devil Soul
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2010
- Messages
- 22,931
- Reaction score
- 45
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i remember that drama by shujat Hashmi as Malik Mehrban it was about NS .My Fav characters were jerry and sherry from jaida and sheda .Was good drama.No.. I havent watched it
So, they can amend their verdict.. yehi tou hum bhi keh rahay hain..
But will this judgment have any impact on the original judgment? This is our question.. So if only one judge disqualifies, what will happen then?
They are not going to because they were right and JIT report endorsed their decision.
hmmm.. thats the tricky par.
If one the the 3 goes against NS then PTI/JI/SR wins as 3:2 (considering the first 2 ) but its 2:1 in this bench so its 2:1 for NS
If this happens under the direct supervision of Arif Nizami - where his paper tags @pmln_org in the tweet and even then 64% says no - then "rejection" tou banti hai
View attachment 412387
[emoji1] That was not my intention.
I wrote the names which came to my mind while posting.
OK, quest law firm ke evidences rejected..
Come to JAFZA..
Just heard Sardar Latif Khosa on ARY in power play.
1. He explained that the JIT was formed not because the 3 judges wanted to dismiss the case against NS but instead to give them (NS) again a chance to submit proof or to establish the money trail.
2. First 2 judges already gaved their verdict and if NS and family had provided any proof which establishes the money trail ONLY then the first 2 judges would have changed their decision on the newly given evidences.
So as far as I understood him, the verdict rests on the implementation bench.
3. He also said that now the bench have to consider the DQ of NS as stated in their interim order.
New Recruit
Lawyer of NS already admitted that he was just a chairman of the board in the company (FZE Capital)and he doesn't own it. So the law regarding concealment of assets doesn't apply in this case. Secondly, as far as 10,000 AED salary is concerned, it was just mentioned on the contract in order to get work permit (Iqamah) and this is a usual practice among the people for the visa purposes. Copy of this work permit is already with Election Commission since 2013.Geo at its best again.. Abhi wait karein.. JAZFa ke baaray main bhi kuch le aayein ge.. Har dafa sochti hun..ke how much shameless can one get? Geo and NS totally suit each other.. Dono ek jitnay dheet aur besharam hain
Lawyer of NS already admitted that he was just a chairman of the board in the company (FZE Capital)and he doesn't own it. So the law regarding concealment of assets doesn't apply in this case. Secondly, as far as 10,000 AED salary is concerned, it was just mentioned on the contract in order to get work permit (Iqamah) and this is a usual practice among the people for the visa purposes. Copy of this work permit is already with Election Commission since 2013.
lolzz
Yeh jo nahi kehnay walay hain naa.. inn main se 40 % next elections main vote hi nahi dalaingay..
OK, quest law firm ke evidences rejected..
Come to JAFZA..
Lawyer of NS already admitted that he was just a chairman of the board in the company (FZE Capital)and he doesn't own it. So the law regarding concealment of assets doesn't apply in this case. Secondly, as far as 10,000 AED salary is concerned, it was just mentioned on the contract in order to get work permit (Iqamah) and this is a usual practice among the people for the visa purposes. Copy of this work permit is already with Election Commission since 2013.
Check your facts again..... It was never mentioned to EC that he is also a chairman of FZE. He was also the chairman till 2014 which means a year after being in power.