What's new

Panama Case - Post Verdict Discussion and Updates

Where did I smile? Chachu.. kuppi pilo abhi bhi keh raha hun..
The Child is smiling in that picture.

Angrezi meri maadri zaban nahi. Agar ghalat likh diya ho.

Kafi lul goal tha because of ball watching defenders...on the other hand , Kimmich ka goal was actually outstanding.

Lol

Fluke tha bhai.

Cross de raha tha
 
I am ashamed of it.

Furthermore i am ashamed that educated Pakistanis are using it as a pun in their arguments against corruption instead of pointing out that 30 years of corruption is forcing Kids into hard Labor.

You can choose a thousand examples but use them wisely.

Don't judge the intentions.. What did you take from that uncle?
 
Don't judge the intentions.. What did you take from that uncle?

I am not judging Intentions

I am commenting on the poor wisdom to present the Intentions in spoken slash written words.

Anything Else?
 
I am not judging Intentions

I am commenting on the poor wisdom to present the Intentions in spoken slash written words.

Anything Else?

You judged the intentions.. you asked me to have some shame..

How did you know what was my intention when you asked me to be ashamed?
 
I did Not write you have a smile.

I wrote that the Child has a smile while doing hard Labor.

You simply misunderstood.

So if I was saying that Hussain Nawaz looked like him when he struggled to purchase london flats (because this child resembles Hussain Nawaz to be honest), was it that I was making fun of that child or Hussain Nawaz?
 
You judged the intentions.. you asked me to have some shame..

How did you know what was my intention when you asked me to be ashamed?

Yeah i did

Because you wrote.

Hussein Nawaz laying foundations of bla bla.

What did you mean by Hussein Nawaz reference?

So if I am saying that Hussain Nawaz looked like him when he struggled to purchase london flats (because this child resembles Hussain Nawaz to be honest), was it that I was making fun of that child or Hussain Nawaz?

The Child.

Wo halal kama raha Hai according to you too.
 
Redco InternationalRedco International is a leading industrial manufacturing and contracting group operating in Qatar since 1982. The company is owned by H.E. Sheikh Jassim bin Hamad Al Thani and Ex-Senator, Saif ur Rehman. Redco International has been a leader in precast concrete manufacturing and erection in Qatar since the 1980s, and is also amongst the leaders in ready-mix concrete manufacturing, steel cut & bend, Mechanical-Electrical-Plumbing (MEP), and building works (general contracting).

http://www.redcointl.com/



Just to give folks here a hint. How Qatari Prince letter came into being.
 
Yeah i did

Because you wrote.

Hussein Nawaz laying foundations of bla bla.

What did you mean by Hussein Nawaz reference?



The Child.

Wo halal kama raha Hai according to you too.

Arey tou uncle, uss child ka mazaq kaun urra raha hai?

Tum seriously batao, tumhain mazaq urranay ka matlab pata hai?

Wo halal kama raha Hai according to you too.

Mere iss jumlay se hi tumhain andaza hojana chahiey tha ke main child labor ko bhi child ki halaal kamai samajhta hun.. jabkay tum Tazeerat e Pakistan ko beech main le aaey.. kyun?
 
Arey tou uncle, uss child ka mazaq kaun urra raha hai?

Tum seriously batao, tumhain mazaq urranay ka matlab pata hai?



Mere iss jumlay se hi tumhain andaza hojana chahiey tha ke main child labor ko bhi child ki halaal kamai samajhta hun.. jabkay tum Tazeerat e Pakistan ko beech main le aaey.. kyun?

Its protest that under 15 Labor is forbidden by shariat e Pakistan.

Ab me do sawaal pochoga
 
shariat e Pakistan.
:-)

Anyway, back to that pic again..

If I am saying that the claim of Shareef family: that the children were owners of the flats without the help of father.. and I am saying that Hussain must be resembling that child while working for the flats (which obviously his sorry A$$ can't do even now).. what do you take from this?

Shaming the child, or shaming Hussain Nawaz?

Its protest that under 15 Labor is forbidden by shariat e Pakistan.

It doesn't mean that Kamai becomes haraam.. agree?
 
:-)

Anyway, back to that pic again..

If I am saying that the claim of Shareef family: that the children were owners of the flats without the help of father.. and I am saying that Hussain must be resembling that child while working for the flats (which obviously his sorry A$$ can't do even now).. what do you take from this?

Shaming a child, or shaming Hussain Nawaz?



It doesn't mean that Kamai becomes haraam.. agree?

Jo point ho ghareeb bache ko hata kar prove karo.

Han agree zarori nahi.

Or ab batao dhamki de rahe they... kyon?
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom