Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
After yesterday, I am feeling better actually..
Kiya? Aap exactly kia keh rahay hain ke 3 judges par koi pressure nahi tha...J Khosa aur Gulzar ke verdict ka........Unhon ne khud na ehal kiya ya establishment ke kehnay par ya kia? Sorry..main kuch theek se samjhi nahi aap ki baat...
Because some people (JI) have already gone to SC I have heard.. I think phir PMLN ka lawyer SC main kahega ke this case is already being heard in HC so iss ko ghair muayyana muddat ke liey aagay barhadia jaey.. iss liey PTI is weighing its options to go to the right place first time..
JI ko pata nahi kia soojhti hai achanak.. agar yeh khabar sachi hai tou..
Specific change is made in declaration for a reason.
Anyone can keep eyes closed to such changes is entirely another matter.
It has religious implications rather than legal.
The change has been made specifically to leave a personal loop hole. Every comma and full stop has implications, this is a complete and specific omission.
Why change it in the first place?
HC main case pending honay ki wajah se SC main case aagay nahi barhaaya jaa sakta.. Infact SC main agar case chal raha ho..tu HC..postpone kar deti hain..
PTI ko SC hi jaana chahye.. Wahan se relief milnay ke kaafpfi chances hain..
Panma case bhi koi HC bhi le kar gaya tha.. ..aur SC main bhi PML N ke lawyers ne kaha tha ke HC main case hai..wahan chalnay dein case...... J Khosa ne likha tha verdict main ke agar same case...HC main bhi pending ya chal raha ho...tu SC ko us se koi farq nahi parta.. Hum independently case suntay hain
PTI ko har soorat SC hi jaana chahye,, sheikh Rashid bhi shayad SC hi jaa raha hai.. SC bar council bhi challenge karrahi hai SC main..
HC main case pending honay ki wajah se SC main case aagay nahi barhaaya jaa sakta.. Infact SC main agar case chal raha ho..tu HC..postpone kar deti hain..
PTI ko SC hi jaana chahye.. Wahan se relief milnay ke kaafpfi chances hain..
Panma case bhi koi HC bhi le kar gaya tha.. ..aur SC main bhi PML N ke lawyers ne kaha tha ke HC main case hai..wahan chalnay dein case...... J Khosa ne likha tha verdict main ke agar same case...HC main bhi pending ya chal raha ho...tu SC ko us se koi farq nahi parta.. Hum independently case suntay hain
PTI ko har soorat SC hi jaana chahye,, sheikh Rashid bhi shayad SC hi jaa raha hai.. SC bar council bhi challenge karrahi hai SC main..
I am just trying to understand, if they have removed "solemn affirmation" words from every para, and have put one sentence about solemn affirmation to cover all the paras in one go.. kia yeh cover nahi karta?
I am still waiting for religious scholars to review and give opinion..
I think JI bhi review kar rahi hai, JUI-S bhi kar rahi hai.. Even JUI-F bhi kar rahi hai.. uss ke baad pata chalay ga..
Yes, I think you are right.. I remember Justice Khosa said that..
Maybe I skipped something that you posted earlier .... feeling better, as in feeling good or don't give a damn type better? What's the news?
Why change it ? Was it using more ink?
Yes, I think you are right.. I remember Justice Khosa said that..
Justice Khosa ka verdict tu almost ratt chuka hai, mujhe......loll
I know you can quote the verdict anytime..
News yeh hai ke kuchh red lines cross ho gaee hain.. jis par kuchh na kuchh hosakta hai.. buhat jald..
Lekin nawaz yehi chah raha hai ke kuchh ho..
Don't have any idea..
But you are right, if you link it with voter lists, their intention is clear..
You know about voter lists, right?