Brother google Major Iqbal .
Now we both agree SSG Was involved in Kargil .
Rest i told you we should close the case because you will not agree even though proved thousand times that SSG fail to defend and offence against Indian army you have excuses for each war .
Glacier they ran out of supply when asked ok but what happen to the military attack they did to recapture post ? You didn't answer . Even 1995 incident when 40 SSG soldiers were killed in an attempt to capture outpost manned by Sikh soldiers
Then now you are on Kargil ... !! You came up with IAF while in all previous war PAF Was superiors to IAF ( Accodring to Pakistanis they even claim in 1971 PAF was superior ) and whats stop them to interfare in Kargil ? Since there is thousand thread running where Pakistani claims that PAF is not scared of BVR advantage of IAF . So , now u agree to close or not ?
Now dont come with BS that PAF was not aware because i will say Musharaf was From SSG and you know what I mean he was planner after all of kargil .
Major Iqbal? What's the significant of a junior officer?
And no, we do not agree on SSG being involved in Kargil War, as my stance is that SSG was not involved. It was only a Rangers/FC type of force which was later inducted into mainstream Army as NLI.
There are failures and then there are failures. SSG did not fail in holding and defending any occupied territory until it had no option but to withdraw from the fight, and that is because of lack of ammunition and ration rather then anything that Indian Military could muster in terms of actual combat. And when has Pakistan Army not given a befitting reply to Indian Army ........ other then the occasion when Pakistan was at war with itself?
And now I have to tell you what stopped PAF from entering the Kargil war? It is apparent to even a child that PAF could not enter Kargil war as Pakistan was officially denying any involvement in Kargil as a strategic measure. Could IAF provided the level of support, it did to Indian Army, had PAF been deployed to engage them? Could the Indian Army mount assaults in the manner they did had Pakistan Army been deployed to engage them officially?
PAF was BVR equipped ever since Mirages got their ROSE upgrades! any other tale is just a story that IAF spreads as it cannot come out and say that PAF was not allowed to engage as the official stance of Pakistan was of non-involvement in Kargil.
read this, and accept that indian army kicked your pakistan army's @$$ in kargil. i think an officer from ISI's analysis wing knows better than you about the kargil war. indian army was not retreating,
Putting our children in line of fire
The boys were comforted by their commander’s assessment that no serious response would come. But it did — wave after wave, supported by massive air bursting artillery and repeated air attacks
actually navaz Sharif save pakistan army by asking US help to stop the war. otherwise pakistan army would had to face another 71 war.
watch this: a video is better than 100000 words.
Did you actually bother to watch the video yourself? Please do, before you shame yourself further as the General (R) tells tales of the bravery of some of our soldiers who fought against overwhelming odds to the last man and the last bullet despite being ordered to retreat. The General (R) also speaks about the inability of Indian Military, despite extremely disproportionate use of force, to dislodge many of the positions held by Pakistani fighters. What else must one say about 5k fighters r***** Indian Military in excess of 35,000 and supported by 10+ squadrons of IAF!!!
Or perhaps you just do not know the meaning of kicking @$$!!
