Pakistan's Nuclear Submarine Development | News and Discussions

[Secur]

All international vessels are warned of entering Pakistani Territorial waters by India in case of a blockade. If they chose to ignore that, they do so at own risk - risk of being bombed intentionally or unintentionally in case of plausible deniability if India wants to go that far.

Lastly, to enforce a blockade, no ship needs to be present to board and seize contraband. If a blockade is what IN has in mind for Pakistan, all the existing ports of Pakistan along its entire coastline will be bombed either by missiles, or by planes. For any kind of major imports like Oil, you will need those major terminals

All fancy plans aside , IN is not what you consider it to be ... Why haven't you assumed the Pakistani retaliation with traditional weapons ? Didn't suit your bollywood script , huh ? ... Even if i assume it is , capable of destroying and blockading Pakistani ports and other facilities without suffering unacceptable damage , do you remember what do we do even when we are not threatened ? ... Now just replace the scenario with " threatened " and then with " the integrity of the country is in danger " conditions ... Remember 8 seconds warning , amigo ?

Mate, India has done this before - attacked and rendered non functional Karachi port. India will attack any infrastructure of Pakistan that it deems can be useful in running the Pakistani war effort.

Sorry , but there is no similarity of any kind whatsoever between then Pakistan and the one today ... You have mobilized forces 3 times since then , backed off each time unilaterally , ever cared to think " Why so ? "

^^ expensive but doable. War is bloody business no side will be under the illusion they are going to come off intact.

Some appear to be under the illusion mostly on the other side of the border ...

 

[Rafi]

Our sea based nuclear deterrent became a reality - when the NSFC was formed, regarding our "unconventional" sub all the crying and whining by our young indian female friends will change the reality of it.

Regarding a potential blockade - IMO impossible - contingency plans will entail india suffering heavy losses by way of attrition.

C-602 Operational
Range 400km +

And other delights waiting for our dear indian friends.

 

[Secur]

Making gravity nuclear bombs isn't hard for any nation, US did that in 1945. And please care to learn the difference between a nuclear bomb and a nuclear reactor.

Please care to understand the implied message , if we can achieve that , we can achieve this too Not so long ago , we couldn't be a nuclear power , never could manufacture missiles , then we did that too and Indians again went in denial , the same happened with MBT and Aircraft , the same happened after we test fired cruise missiles ...

Who's to say you wont be denial again after ISPR one day suddenly announces it operational ?

Our sea based nuclear deterrent became a reality - when the NSFC was formed, regarding our "unconventional" sub all the crying and whining by our young indian female friends will change the reality of it.

Regarding a potential blockade - IMO impossible - contingency plans will entail india suffering heavy losses by way of attrition.

C-602 Operational
Range 400km +

And other delights waiting for our dear indian friends.

Cm'on , this is their only chance to write a fancy bollywood script , let them continue doing so conveniently assuming that the other side cant retaliate :lol ... Even after the sub is operational , they will still be in denial ...

Did you see that part in " Inception " where the chemist takes them to a basement where dozens of people are sharing dreams and the old man tell Cobb " Who are you to tell them what is reality ? " ... This is the reality for them

 

[Contrarian]

Sir, I have strong reason to believe otherwise. Met a Russian once who was involved in this project. However, the Russian may have been boasting.

Russians were definitely involved intimately. It was their designs in the first place.
However, after the nuclear tests it became really hard for them to extend the support that they were earlier.

All fancy plans aside , IN is not what you consider it to be ... Why haven't you assumed the Pakistani retaliation with traditional weapons ? Didn't suit your bollywood script , huh ? ... Even if i assume it is , capable of destroying and blockading Pakistani ports and other facilities without suffering unacceptable damage , do you remember what do we do even when we are not threatened ? ... Now just replace the scenario with " threatened " and then with " the integrity of the country is in danger " conditions ... Remember 8 seconds warning , amigo ?



Sorry , but there is no similarity of any kind whatsoever between then Pakistan and the one today ... You have mobilized forces 3 times since then , backed off each time unilaterally , ever cared to think " Why so ? "

Some appear to be under the illusion mostly on the other side of the border ...

Why do you even bother posting. Coherency is not your forte.

 

[Ticker]

Russians were definitely involved intimately. It was their designs in the first place.
However, after the nuclear tests it became really hard for them to extend the support that they were earlier.

Why do you even bother posting. Coherency is not your forte.

Sir, actually I met him after 1998 nuclear explosions. And as I understood, the cooperation continued even after the tests. Please don't get me wrong, i am not gearing to prove you wrong.

 

[Contrarian]

Nah mate, there's no absolute right or wrong. Its a question of degrees.The cooperation was significantly reduced compared to pre nuclear explosions. The other world powers made it quite hard - and with a Russia that was then very pliable.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Considering Pakistan already can build submarines Agosta Project , going from that to Nuclear platform is easier for Pakistan since , we already have nuclear technology and experience in working with large scale models for electricity production.


All we need to do is develop a small scale propulsion system , with help form Chinese and other parties not so difficult

I would say it was hard had we not attained TOT from France for submarine construction

 

[Viper0011.]

Nah mate, there's no absolute right or wrong. Its a question of degrees.The cooperation was significantly reduced compared to pre nuclear explosions. The other world powers made it quite hard - and with a Russia that was then very pliable.

Not to make it sound like a piece of cake....but it's the cruise missile game again. The world was caught by surprised when the PA tested the cruise missile. Frankly speaking, I am sure folks in pentagon are now just awaiting to hear a news of some sort.

The Augusta tech was provided to Pakistan. You have to be retarded to not be able to copy designs and modify things as you please and then run statistics on the new models. Testing and numbers prove everything right.

If someone can prove to the world that G is really equal to 11.3 and can back it up with testable claims, if numbers back it up, it'll become reality. But for anyone to figure out if G = 11.3......they had to start from G=9.8 and then modify parameters and test and run statistics!!! Hope this helps. The tech's already there along with Brains. $$ and some guidance is needed and that's it!

 

[Arsalan]

Making gravity nuclear bombs isn't hard for any nation, US did that in 1945. And please care to learn the difference between a nuclear bomb and a nuclear reactor.

Nuclear bomb me taar (wire) ghusane se bizli (electricity) nahi milti.

US also launched there first nuclear submarine, USS Nautilus on January 1954


Thanks for pointing out the differences between nuclear bombs and nuclear reactors and nuclear others but the FACT that you present to support your CLAIM, That US made the Nuclear bomb in 1945 do not helps much.

I mean, if as a rule of thumb, it takes 9 years to go to nuclear sub from nuclear bomb, we are running late!!

 

[Penguin]

What a waste of space.

 

[somebozo]

we cannot build land based reactors without chinese help how can be build marine nuclear reactors which are much more complicated?

 

[Edevelop]

Indians will get plenty of surprises....

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Based on the reports Pakistan has decided to build its own "Nuclear Submarines" and budget will set aside enough funds to ensure Pakistan has its first Nuclear Submarine in 4-5 years time

Its in the news then its gona happen

 

[Don Jaguar]

I am waiting for it.

 

[LEGENDARY WARRIOR]

Based on the reports Pakistan has decided to build its own "Nuclear Submarines" and budget will set aside enough funds to ensure Pakistan has its first Nuclear Submarine in 4-5 years time

Its in the news then its gona happen

any source for the news bro???