Pakistanis and North West Indians have same Ancestors.

[Taimoor Khan]

It was Syrians and Iraqis who colonised and build IVC in Indus and west Coast. Mostly nativesof these regions.

Wrong. Indus sits on top as the world most ancient empire/civilization. Its way older then Babylon and Egypt. What to say about Syrians, Iraqis or anyone else. The evolution of human civilization started from Indus, to Babylon, and then to Egypt, going east to west. Thats is why ancient Pakistan/Indus is called cradle of civilization. The direction of lineage is going outside Pakistan, not inwards. Any other suggestion otherwise, is flying in the face of archaeological facts, which crowns Indus as the elite of all, the first one.

http://www.ancient-code.com/new-stu...ation-predates-ancient-egyptian-civilization/

While many people around the globe consider the Ancient Egyptian and Sumerian civilization as one of the most complex civilization to have developed in the distant past, the truth is that the Indus Valley Civilization might predate them by some 2,500 years.


Ancient Pakistan fits perfectly in timeline with the story of Nuh/Noah OR as you guys in India who believe in Hinduism refer to a person called "Ma-nu".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shraddhadeva_Manu

The reason most Indus cities are burried 10 feet under ground is a typical aftermath of massive flood/tsunami.

Bottom line is, Ancient Pakistan is the starting point of humanity and from it came the rest.

 

[Ross Geller]

Wrong. Indus sits on top as the world most ancient empire/civilization. Its way older then Babylon and Egypt. What to say about Syrians, Iraqis or anyone else. The evolution of human civilization started from Indus, to Babylon, and then to Egypt, going east to west. Thats is why ancient Pakistan/Indus is called cradle of civilization. The direction of lineage is going outside Pakistan, not inwards. Any other suggestion otherwise, is flying in the face of archaeological facts, which crowns Indus as the elite of all, the first one.

http://www.ancient-code.com/new-stu...ation-predates-ancient-egyptian-civilization/

While many people around the globe consider the Ancient Egyptian and Sumerian civilization as one of the most complex civilization to have developed in the distant past, the truth is that the Indus Valley Civilization might predate them by some 2,500 years.


Ancient Pakistan fits perfectly in timeline with the story of Nuh/Noah OR as you guys in India who believe in Hinduism refer to a person called "Ma-nu".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shraddhadeva_Manu

The reason most Indus cities are burried 10 feet under ground is a typical aftermath of massive flood/tsunami.

Bottom line is, Ancient Pakistan is the starting point of humanity and from it came the rest.

You mean ancient India , right ?

 

[Taimoor Khan]

You mean ancient India , right ?

There is nothing as such ancient India. Word india is colonial. Ancient Pakistan is the right word.

 

[Ross Geller]

There is nothing as such ancient India. Word india is colonial. Ancient Pakistan is the right word.

Okay , Ancient Bharat then , right ?

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Okay , Ancient Bharat then , right ?

There is no ancient Bharat. The Indus was build by the the Pakistanis and expanded to the lands which are now part of India, from Kashmir down to Gujrat, the western belt.

 

[Ross Geller]

There is no ancient Bharat. The Indus was build by the the Pakistanis and expanded to the lands which are now part of India, from Kashmir down to Gujrat, the western belt.

Bharat is an ancient term for north Indian region . There is no proof ivc was built by pakistanis , for all we know it was centred around extinct saraswati river making ivc a misnomer. Most of the ivc sites lie in India anyway ; so we have more claims on ivc than pakistan or afghanistan. Just because first two ivc sites were found in the region comprising pakistan does not mean it was centered in pakistan or spread out of that region

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Bharat is an ancient term for north Indian region . There is no proof ivc was built by pakistanis , for all we know it was centred around extinct saraswati river making ivc a misnomer. Most of the ivc sites lie in India anyway ; so we have more claims on ivc than pakistan or afghanistan. Just because first two ivc sites were found in the region comprising pakistan does not mean it was centered in pakistan or spread out of that region

Bharat is a figment of imagination of Indians and those RSS goons. If Pakistanis didnt build IVC, its like saying the present day Egyptians didnt build their civilization centered around Nile. And that Saraswati river is as mythical as your claims of ancient bharat. IVC is called "Indus" valley civilization and recognized as such all over. Go and check were Indus flows. Right in the heart of Pakistan. India has as much claim to it, as present day Syria, Israel, Sudan would to the ancient Egypt, because once, they were PART of the ancient empire. Understand the difference. Pakistan was the heartland, the governing body, the others were hinterlands. Its a open and shut case really.

 

[Ross Geller]

Bharat is a figment of imagination of Indians and those RSS goons. If Pakistanis didnt build IVC, its like saying the present day Egyptians didnt build their civilization centered around Nile. And that Saraswati river is as mythical as your claims of ancient bharat. IVC is called "Indus" valley civilization and recognized as such all over. Go and check were Indus flows. Right in the heart of Pakistan. India has as much claim to it, as present day Syria, Israel, Sudan would to the ancient Egypt, because once, they were PART of the ancient empire. Understand the difference. Pakistan was the heartland, the governing body, the others were hinterlands. Its a open and shut case really.

No , its not .There is ample proof that egyptian civ was centred around nile but no proof that ivc was centred around indus ; in fact majority of ivc sites lie on the banks of now extinct saraswati . Its been proven that saraswati was a real river , not a mythical one . And even if we accept saraswati never existed ,there are more IVC sites in India than in pakistan anyway .

BTW , IVC is recognised as an ancient Indian civilization world over . Do you subscribe to that too ?

 

[Saba Ali Malik]

you're so lame, at least look at a map before talking BS

 

[Kao Boy]

Pakistanis living on the Indus plains and Indians living in the far west coast seem to come from the same ancestor.

Punjab,Sindh,Rajasthan,Haryana,Gujarat,Kashmir,Jammu

What you actually wanted to say by sharing the clueless image?

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

thats North East .. Genius.

you want to take me to khalistan,Kashmir.

 

[Vishvamitra]

There is no ancient Bharat. The Indus was build by the the Pakistanis and expanded to the lands which are now part of India, from Kashmir down to Gujrat, the western belt.

no , it was Ancestors of Pakstanis, Haryanvis, Rajasthanis and Gujaratis who created IVC.

 

[Jackdaws]

There are many Indian Restaurants here in Australia that market by adding Pakistani and Bangladeshi and some even add srilankan.

I'd like to see an Indian owned restaurant marketing itself selling "Pakistani" cuisine. Do post a link or proof; I am happy to be corrected.

 

[Zen0]

you want to take me to khalistan,Kashmir.

khalistan is 40% of Pakistan , so chances are you are already there.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

khalistan is 40% of Pakistan , so chances are you are already there.

not many Sikhs here. but we will give them their embassy at nankana sahib.