What's new

Pakistani taxi driver crying

.
0100995.jpg


This guy deserves respect regardless of his nationality.:tup:
 
. . . . . . . . .
MANY THINGS ARE NOT ACCORDING TO MY CHOICE.....
but we've to accept that....on as it is BASIS.....

Many lives are ruined in my Country and still we're dreaming for MIRACLE
.
Its a very positive sign, we are in the middle of ocean of hopelessness but wanting ourselves to FIGHT-BACK
 
.

awwww :lol:

hey watch this poor guy lol
why is he acting so patriotic
@Horus @Leader @Sardar Singh @gambit

randomly tagged few people
already posted

and he's no patriotic. Tears doesn't define the level of patriotism. Just because someone is so sad and crying, goes to youtube to make a video, he doesn't become patriotic.

Patriotic Pakistani guy. Salute him. Respect.

A common man earning hard abroad understands the pain and suffering of Pakistanis.
Should come back to Pakistan and work for the country. The tax money will help gov't too.
 
.
already posted

and he's no patriotic. Tears doesn't define the level of patriotism. Just because someone is so sad and crying, goes to youtube to make a video, he doesn't become patriotic.


Should come back to Pakistan and work for the country. The tax money will help gov't too.
Sahi baat hai. I'll go with your thinking as well..
 
.
I didn't get all that he was saying. Could someone explain?
Was he criticizing Imran Khan as a cricket captain, or as a party leader?
 
.
already posted

and he's no patriotic. Tears doesn't define the level of patriotism. Just because someone is so sad and crying, goes to youtube to make a video, he doesn't become patriotic.


Should come back to Pakistan and work for the country. The tax money will help gov't too.

I have a question for you, based on your signature: why do you think Imran Khan is anti-judiciary? He has certainly not physically attacked the Supreme Court, the way we see Nawaz and his fellows doing in a well-known video. He actively supported the Lawyers' Movement for the restoration of the judiciary.
He definitely has a low opinion of some individual members of the judiciary, and of some problems in the institution (such as corruption), thinking that it therefore needs reform; but it is his right, as a citizen of a democracy, to have and express such an opinion.
I am not seeing the problem here, if this is all it means to be anti-judiciary.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom