The Afghan officials have claimed that. Besides, the Afghan Taliban have never publicly declared that they will target Indians or their consulates. Historically they have spent more time targeting American and NATO
security forces.
Oh well, if the Afhan officaials claimed it then well, it must be correct then........Please go buy yourself a loaded pistol, put the barrel in your mouth and pull the trigger..........For crying out loud, how stupid does one have to be......Do you have evidence of ISI involvement, answer= no, ok good, lets move on.
Sorry but this is just rambling. There is no reason why a democratically elected govt. in Afghanistan can consist of 'very knowledgeable scholar/s"
and in the garb of 'sharia' rule a one party dictatorship of a rag tag militia men who would give fatwas to legitimize crimes like saying its OK to transport and trade in poppy and heroin as long as we don't "sell to Europeans and Americans" who are not Muslims.
Why can you not understand clearly, they don't want your way of life, how clear do the Afghans need to be.....I say Afghan, as no Taliban would have survived had they not been supported by locals....none. They want an Islamic Shariah system, fine by me, if that is what suits them then so be it, but for you go then say in other words that a Shariah system gives them a green light to legalise drugs trafficking, then Sir, I request you watch your mouth, as insults will start to come in thick and fast from members here.It is a recorded fact in the media before the war and 9/11 that the Taliban had destroyed 90% of the drug trade in the land which they governed, only to justify the war and discredit the Taliban did the media do an about turn and claim taliban ran the trade.
link ------------->
Afghanistan, Opium and the Taliban <------------ link
So please get your points in order and not talk out your rear end.
You seem to be confused, democracy is not equal to "western way of life". It means ruling with consultation of the people. Its the people of Afghanistan who decide what they want.
Exactly, the people of Afghanistan, so what makes you think they want democracy, has India asks or held a referendum, with all ints inhabitants, including the Taliban........NO....
They have always resisted outside interference, that Sir, includes India. Democracy is fitting in other countries yes, but not there, as they will choose their own path......nad anyway, Deocracy always only goes with the majority, that does not mean it is equal or right, it is just a system which can be altered or amended.
Not a blame game, I'm sure Indian agencies will be gathering intelligence info even with in Pakistan at present. Col. Purohit was involved in bomb attacks in Malegaon which were to be blamed on muslims living there. But again it happened IN INDIA. Not in Pakistan.
However, there are many instances were Pakistani nationals have crossed the border into India and even tried full out combat without even declaring war such as in Kargil.
The long term solution is that dialogue is the only way this will be solved because the last 20 year history has shown that, although both have suffered, Pakistan has suffered more from the confrontation policy than India.
You fail to get the point, Col Prohit, is a SERVING Indian officer, let me repeat that SERVING........how many other cases are there where the Indian military has staged attacks in the hope of blaming Muslims, as was the case with Col Prohit before he got caught.
You evidence provided during 26/11 was nothing short of laughable....even I saw on TV how Indian officers were handing over exhibits in bags to one another and bags left unattended. What kind of continuity is left in that, there is no authticity in those exhibits at all. Any court here in the UK will throw them out and never allow them to be tendered in evidence. There are numerous examples one can go with, but another argument for another thread........
Point to come back to.......proof. By the Indian media screaming a thousand times that these attacks are under the supervision of the ISI or LeT doesn't mean that is the case and doesn't become true......
Kargil is already in front of everyone, they were Pakistani soldiers and Pakistan and India are on the LOC, not the Internatinal border, the LOC. It is disputed territory and like India who think they can justify Siachen, so too can Pakistan, whether India likes it or not, that is one way to bring Kashmir to the International arena and it worked up until 9/11 came ahead, this changed alot for the worse with regards to the Kashmir struggle, hence we are the loosers in many ways here also and trying to recover where we can.
