What's new

Pakistani government provides the military with further antidemocratic powers

Status
Not open for further replies.

FalconsForPeace

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2013
Messages
1,132
Reaction score
3
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
By Sampath Perera
10 February 2014

The Pakistani government of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has enacted anti-democratic laws that give the military sweeping powers in the name of fighting terrorism. The immediate target is Islamic fundamentalist groups, but the real aim is to take on the working class.

The new laws, titled the Protection of Pakistan Ordinance, were declared in October last year and amendments further strengthening the legislation were incorporated in January. The measures came into force on February 2, via a presidential order that is effective for 90 days. The government recently presented the laws to parliament in an effort to make them permanent.

Pakistan’s military already enjoys wide-ranging powers under the country’s various “anti-terror” ordinances. The new legislation is aimed at providing the military with total legal immunity. In recent months, the army has confronted several cases brought before civil courts, over the killing and disappearing of civilians. The new ordinance and amendments will prevent further cases being brought, by legalising arbitrary arrests and detention carried out by “authorised officers” of the armed forces.

The new laws include the following provisions:

* Section 3 of the ordinance allows the armed forces to prevent any offence “against the country.” The armed forces have “all the powers of a police officer.” The military can use force after warning a person who is about to commit an offence, and it is “lawful” for soldiers to fire upon them. Armed forces officers “may arrest” without warrant any person “scheduled to commit an offence,” and also search premises without warrant and arrest people.

Offences are defined in wide ranging terms, including not just violent acts of terrorism, but also “crimes against computers including cyber crimes, internet offenses” and “crimes against ethnic, religious and political groups or minorities including offences based on discrimination, hatred, creed and race.”

* Section 6 gives officers the power to arrest people and detain them for 90 days in the name of preventive detention on a government order. Persons alleged to be “acting in a manner prejudicial to the integrity, security, defence of Pakistan or any part thereof or external affairs of Pakistan, or public order or maintenance of supplies and services” can be taken into custody under preventive detention.

* The government will establish special courts, with the powers of higher courts, to try those arrested. Punishment will be determined according to the country’s penal code, but if there are no existing provisions then a blanket sentence will be imposed of imprisonment for not less than 10 years. The special courts also have the authority to strip alleged offenders of their Pakistani citizenship.

* The Protection of Pakistan Ordinance explicitly states that the burden of proof falls on the person arrested: “An accused facing the charge of a scheduled offence on existence of reasonable evidence against him, shall be presumed to be engaged in waging war or insurrection against Pakistan unless he establishes his non-involvement in the offence.”

* In the name of “national security,” the government will keep secret “information relating to the location of the detainee or accused or intern or internment centre.” Powers have also been given for “exclusion of public from proceedings of special courts” meaning those courts can hear cases in secret.

These new laws have been introduced to absolve the security forces from charges of arbitrary arrests, detentions, disappearances and the killing of civilians during military operations. Several reports have emerged in recent years of mass graves being discovered in Pakistan.

The UN news agency IRIN wrote on December 9 about a clash between the military and the judiciary over cases filed against army officers. Referring to a case involving the disappearance of 35 people from an internment centre in Waziristan, IRIN reported: “A packed court room watched as the defence minister [Khawaja Asif] has offered one excuse after another, failing to produce the [accused military] men before the courts or even to disclose their identities.” The chief justice hearing the case warned Asif to “stop handing us lollipops.”

The Balochistan provincial government has claimed that 592 bodies of those “disappeared” have been unearthed since 2010. However, human rights activists put the number of missing persons in the thousands.

The Dawn newspaper reported on January 18 that the Ministry of Defence had filed a petition against a Pakistani Supreme Court verdict on December 10 holding the army responsible for the 35 missing persons in Waziristan. The defence ministry declared the verdict would “demoralise the troops” who were combating “terrorists” in the Swat valley. A petition drafted by the attorney general’s office stated: “When the army was called to assist civil authorities … the jurisdiction of the high court as well as the fundamental rights guaranteed in the constitution are suspended.”

Now the Sharif administration is seeking to give a veneer of legality to the situation in which the military carries out crimes against the population with impunity.

The government is currently holding discussions with Tehrik-i-Taliban (TTP), but Washington is pressing for the suppression of TTP and demanding Islamabad step up military operations along the border area. Sharif’s top priority is to maintain and strengthen its relationship with Washington.

Pakistan’s opposition parties, including Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), have declared their opposition to the legislation. The PPP’s parliamentary leader in the Senate, Raza Rabbani, told reporters: “The ordinance in its present form is not acceptable.” All of the opposition parties, however, have implemented similar repressive laws in the past and collaborated with former military dictatorships.

The new measures will inevitably be utilised against the working class and rural poor, as the Pakistani ruling elite seeks to crush all opposition to the implementation of IMF-dictated austerity measures.

Pakistani government provides the military with further antidemocratic powers - World Socialist Web Site
 
These laws are really required to combat terrorism, there should also be a law giving the military authority to order summary executions sanctioned by a military court, in the event of an operation any apprehended terrorists should be presented before a military court and if found guilty be executed instead of being handed over to the civilian courts which ultimately let the terrorists go free......
 
If you don't like the PPO, stop yapping when our 'free judiciary' releases self confessed terrorists.
 
So, Is this the pakistani version of AFSPA?
 
Screw our judiciary (I'm a student of law myself) ... The judicial system is fucked up ..

In the past hundreds of terrorists including top leadership of ttp etc had been released by the courts .... And we know the first thing those mofos did after getting released .. Don't we?

Seems to me judges are scared themselves..
 
Last edited:
This is how Pakistani courts act .

Terrorist - Yes I did it , I killed those people .
Judge - No you did not .
Terrorist - But i killed them with my own gun .
judge - when i said you didn't do it then you didn't do it
Terrorist - but i even recorded the video of it .
judge - it is not admissible in the court , you are free to go .
 
Difficult times call for difficult laws.

This seems to be a Pak version of the AFSPA which are needed when tackling insurgency situations.

On a lighter note, when has PA needed laws to do what it wishes to ? Have times changed so much ?
 
I find it ironical when the same Pakistani members who cry a river against AFSPA in J&K end up defending similar powers being granted to Pakistani Army...
 
Looks like an Indian came with a nice article .....and another attempt to "spit on moon"......Indian always try to cook big stories from small things...................to comment and say anything, you must better know the situation in Pakistan the ground realities.....and that mostly world specially Indian's don't know, they only know through what media tell them.
 
Can we stop using unreliable sources please? It's really degrading the quality of the forum.
 
If you don't like the PPO, stop yapping when our 'free judiciary' releases self confessed terrorists.
This is how Pakistani courts act .

Terrorist - Yes I did it , I killed those people .
Judge - No you did not .
Terrorist - But i killed them with my own gun .
judge - when i said you didn't do it then you didn't do it
Terrorist - but i even recorded the video of it .
judge - it is not admissible in the court , you are free to go .
I don't know how many times do I have to make it understand people, judiciary cannot hold or release accused (crime is not yet proven, right?) at its whim. Bailable or non bailable pretty much depends on the nature of the FIR. It is not the magistrate or the judge who decides about the severity of the case but the police officer.

For example, according to PPC (Pakistan Penal Code), there are some 39 sections (299 to 338) in chapter XVI 'OF OFFENCES AFFECTING THE HUMAN BODY'. Depending on the crime scene, and after taking into account the witnesses (if any), and evidences (if any), the police officer would decide which section to apply to that particular crime scene. Some section are are bailable whereas others are non bailable. Now based on the section applied, witness, evidence, and after hearing arguments from the solicitors, the magistrate or the judge will decide whether to grant the bail or not. I have had chance to discuss the cases and personally witness the court proceedings in lower courts with my best friend, a session judge (martyred by Baloch insurgents in 2012, on his way to the court), and I know things don't happen the way people try to present them here.

Terrorists don't get bail because judiciary ain't doing its job, but primarily because of the poor FIR, and lack of evidence and witnesses. Judiciary has to base her decisions on the available laws given in the Penal Code. Does someone know PPC is composed of laws drafted in the year 1860? Naturally, a lot of things have changed since than. It was the job of the supposedly 'law makers' to have drafted or amended the PPC as per the changed circumstances. They never did their job, and found comfort in putting all the blame on the judiciary. It is funny isn't it; you don't give me a pen to write, and than blame me of not drafting the required piece.

Please also note that you cant expect a judicial magistrate or a session judge to take on terrorist as per your desire, because these poor souls have no security. Those who are brave enough end up in their graves like my friend, who was hearing the case of weapon trafficking against Barhamdagh Bugti. This is an irony, compare this to last week's news... Mr. Nisar (the interior minister) does not want to use the bullet-proof car, which was previously in use of the ex-interior minister, Mr. Malik. Reason given, the car was old and could have not protected against RPG, or IEDs.

My friend, it is very convenient for you to put all blame on the judiciary, but ask us, who have lost our finest, and loved ones in the judiciary.

Screw our judiciary (I'm a student of law myself) ... The judicial system is fucked up ..

In the past hundreds of terrorists including top leadership of ttp etc had been released by the courts .... And we know the first thing those mofos did after getting released .. Don't we?

Seems to me judges are scared themselves..
Really? Are you? Is this the language you are taught in the law college? If this much respect you have for your chosen profession, than I can only pray for the judiciary to have her spared from your likes.
 
Last edited:
I find it ironical when the same Pakistani members who cry a river against AFSPA in J&K end up defending similar powers being granted to Pakistani Army...
Comparison of two countries law?
isn't it odd by a senior like you while knowing one area law and special powers are given to forces present in a disputed Area and world largest barracks.
Well these special powers given to PA are applicable to whole country not just J&K unlike AFSPA and IA didn't faced anything like Kamra attack,Mehran base attack neither their GHQs are targeted :coffee:
btw i have feelings now Karachi conditions would also improve .
 
Whats New?

all these points normal and had been there in the past too.

No special power is given to army and above all this "law" is still in the doldrums
 
Comparison of two countries law?
isn't it odd by a senior like you while knowing one area law and special powers are given to forces present in a disputed Area and world largest barracks.
Well these special powers given to PA are applicable to whole country not just J&K unlike AFSPA and IA didn't faced anything like Kamra attack,Mehran base attack neither their GHQs are targeted :coffee:
btw i have feelings now Karachi conditions would also improve .

Firstly, India does not recognize J&K as a disputed area so its actions can not be held to that comparison. Secondly, giving special powers in selected areas is normally considered to be a more tempered approach than giving sweeping powers across the country.. And finally, India has faced its own share of terror strikes by Pakistani terror outfits using Kashmir as a rallying cry.. namely, Mumbai, Red fort, Parliament.. So I guess the comparison is not as far fetched as you believe..
 
By Sampath Perera
10 February 2014

The Pakistani government of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has enacted anti-democratic laws that give the military sweeping powers in the name of fighting terrorism. The immediate target is Islamic fundamentalist groups, but the real aim is to take on the working class.

The new laws, titled the Protection of Pakistan Ordinance, were declared in October last year and amendments further strengthening the legislation were incorporated in January. The measures came into force on February 2, via a presidential order that is effective for 90 days. The government recently presented the laws to parliament in an effort to make them permanent.

Pakistan’s military already enjoys wide-ranging powers under the country’s various “anti-terror” ordinances. The new legislation is aimed at providing the military with total legal immunity. In recent months, the army has confronted several cases brought before civil courts, over the killing and disappearing of civilians. The new ordinance and amendments will prevent further cases being brought, by legalising arbitrary arrests and detention carried out by “authorised officers” of the armed forces.

The new laws include the following provisions:

* Section 3 of the ordinance allows the armed forces to prevent any offence “against the country.” The armed forces have “all the powers of a police officer.” The military can use force after warning a person who is about to commit an offence, and it is “lawful” for soldiers to fire upon them. Armed forces officers “may arrest” without warrant any person “scheduled to commit an offence,” and also search premises without warrant and arrest people.

Offences are defined in wide ranging terms, including not just violent acts of terrorism, but also “crimes against computers including cyber crimes, internet offenses” and “crimes against ethnic, religious and political groups or minorities including offences based on discrimination, hatred, creed and race.”

* Section 6 gives officers the power to arrest people and detain them for 90 days in the name of preventive detention on a government order. Persons alleged to be “acting in a manner prejudicial to the integrity, security, defence of Pakistan or any part thereof or external affairs of Pakistan, or public order or maintenance of supplies and services” can be taken into custody under preventive detention.

* The government will establish special courts, with the powers of higher courts, to try those arrested. Punishment will be determined according to the country’s penal code, but if there are no existing provisions then a blanket sentence will be imposed of imprisonment for not less than 10 years. The special courts also have the authority to strip alleged offenders of their Pakistani citizenship.

* The Protection of Pakistan Ordinance explicitly states that the burden of proof falls on the person arrested: “An accused facing the charge of a scheduled offence on existence of reasonable evidence against him, shall be presumed to be engaged in waging war or insurrection against Pakistan unless he establishes his non-involvement in the offence.”

* In the name of “national security,” the government will keep secret “information relating to the location of the detainee or accused or intern or internment centre.” Powers have also been given for “exclusion of public from proceedings of special courts” meaning those courts can hear cases in secret.

These new laws have been introduced to absolve the security forces from charges of arbitrary arrests, detentions, disappearances and the killing of civilians during military operations. Several reports have emerged in recent years of mass graves being discovered in Pakistan.

The UN news agency IRIN wrote on December 9 about a clash between the military and the judiciary over cases filed against army officers. Referring to a case involving the disappearance of 35 people from an internment centre in Waziristan, IRIN reported: “A packed court room watched as the defence minister [Khawaja Asif] has offered one excuse after another, failing to produce the [accused military] men before the courts or even to disclose their identities.” The chief justice hearing the case warned Asif to “stop handing us lollipops.”

The Balochistan provincial government has claimed that 592 bodies of those “disappeared” have been unearthed since 2010. However, human rights activists put the number of missing persons in the thousands.

The Dawn newspaper reported on January 18 that the Ministry of Defence had filed a petition against a Pakistani Supreme Court verdict on December 10 holding the army responsible for the 35 missing persons in Waziristan. The defence ministry declared the verdict would “demoralise the troops” who were combating “terrorists” in the Swat valley. A petition drafted by the attorney general’s office stated: “When the army was called to assist civil authorities … the jurisdiction of the high court as well as the fundamental rights guaranteed in the constitution are suspended.”

Now the Sharif administration is seeking to give a veneer of legality to the situation in which the military carries out crimes against the population with impunity.

The government is currently holding discussions with Tehrik-i-Taliban (TTP), but Washington is pressing for the suppression of TTP and demanding Islamabad step up military operations along the border area. Sharif’s top priority is to maintain and strengthen its relationship with Washington.

Pakistan’s opposition parties, including Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), have declared their opposition to the legislation. The PPP’s parliamentary leader in the Senate, Raza Rabbani, told reporters: “The ordinance in its present form is not acceptable.” All of the opposition parties, however, have implemented similar repressive laws in the past and collaborated with former military dictatorships.

The new measures will inevitably be utilised against the working class and rural poor, as the Pakistani ruling elite seeks to crush all opposition to the implementation of IMF-dictated austerity measures.

Pakistani government provides the military with further antidemocratic powers - World Socialist Web Site

what the FFFF this sampath parera knows about our military and our laws, keep you nose where it belongs, "the real aim is to take on the working class"...get the fffff away
It only means if you fcuk with country you go six feet under even thats not enough in my opinion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom