Pakistan to host Hurriyat leaders on Eid in New Delhi

[Areesh]

I'm quite sure you have good many skills.. hahaha

Okay.. bbye

Don't worry. Whenever you need attention. You just give us a call. We Pakistanis are gracious enough to care bharati sluts like you.

 

[Norwegian]

Again,this one sentence alone can be rephrased

I know. That's what make it neutral. You can replace Kashmir with Balochistan. Neither country should meddle with another country's internal affairs. That should be the rule of a thumb.

for the thread, MODs will be here soon

When? @Areesh @DESERT FIGHTER and others have been throwing personal "insults" since yesterday. Yet we see no mods appearing. While my post is deleted. That's well heck of a moderation to go through 50 pages of abuses and personal attacks!

 

[S.Bukhari]

India consider Kashmir to be part of India. Pakistan consider Kashmir a disputed territory.

You can not stop Indian mission in Islamabad from hosting a similar party for leader form Baluchistan.

If India considered kashmir his own part why she accepted in UN as a disputed territory and plebiscite ???

 

[ito]

If India considered kashmir his own part why she accepted in UN as a disputed territory and plebiscite ???

Where or when did India said Kashmir is disputed? India took Kashmir to UN for a cease fire with Pakistan. India did accepted for plebiscite, but agreed under Chapter 6 which make it voluntary.

 

[Norwegian]

If India considered kashmir his own part why she accepted in UN as a disputed territory and plebiscite ???

It was in 1947. Things have changed ever since. Apparently not in Pakistan's favor.

 

[Arsalan]

I know. That's what make it neutral. You can replace Kashmir with Balochistan. Neither country should meddle with another country's internal affairs. That should be the rule of a thumb.

It doesn't, what makes it neutral is that you explain it like that!! This makes it complex to understand the actual meaning but still attractive to people with extreme views (ON BOTH SIDES) to come a troll!

When? @Areesh @DESERT FIGHTER and others have been throwing personal "insults" since yesterday. Yet we see no mods appearing. While my post is deleted. That's well heck of a moderation to go through 50 pages of abuses and personal attacks!

I have reported over a dozen posts of yourself and the other two members as well. Have contacted MOD and requested to end this bullshit stupidity once and for all.

 

[Norwegian]

India did accepted for plebiscite, but agreed under Chapter 6 which make it voluntary.

No, plebiscite was about to take place if Pakistan followed its UN mandated preconditions which it never did.

I have reported over a dozen posts of yourself and the other two members as well. Have contacted MOD and requested to end this bullshit stupidity once and for all.

Thanks. They should have been here earlier.

 

[ito]

No, plebiscite was about to take place if Pakistan followed its UN mandated preconditions which it never did.


Thanks. They should have been here earlier.

Yes, there are preconditions that Pakistan has to follow, but I am saying that the plebiscite was passed under chapter 6, which are voluntary, unlike those passed under chapter 7 that are mandatory.

 

[Norwegian]

Yes, there are preconditions that Pakistan has to follow, but I am saying that the plebiscite was passed under chapter 6, which are voluntary, unlike those passed under chapter 7 that are mandatory.

Voluntary or Mandatory. Doesn't matter. India asked for it. UN agreed on it. Pakistan backed off from it. Chickens are coming home to roost!

 

[Irfan Baloch]

Or begging for attention from a Pakistani. A typical slut haan??

India doesnt beg from Pakistan but its America
India highest recipient of US economic assistance: USAID

 

[ito]

Voluntary or Mandatory. Doesn't matter. India asked for it. UN agreed on it. Pakistan backed off from it. Chickens are coming home to roost!

The no war...no peace situation is taking a toll on Pakistan. Unlike Pakistan, for India the cost of Kashmir is marginal. Pakistan has to make a choice either it wants Pakistan or Kashmir.

 

[Irfan Baloch]

Lets be practical india will not give its part to Pakistan at same time vice versa so better to be concentrate on thier part and develop it instead of throwing stone at each Other and finally everything depends on thier financial power respectively

true. actually opening the borders and allowing free movement of kashmiris will actually not only bring down the tension and frustration of Kashmiris but the economic trade and social welfare will discourage violence.

by the way, our local Hindu members of community have accepted our invitation for Eid celebration
I mean who can turn down a good Asian feast specially made in accordance to common tastes and preferences.

If you read it again, it was not against Pakistan. I made my point perfectly clear that if Pakistan do not like India meeting with Baloch separatists in Islamabad, then India likewise would not like Pakistan meeting with Kashmiri separatists in Delhi. Obviously, I in one sentence alone exposed double standards in our foreign policy which was cheered by Indians and blasted by ultra-nationalist Pakistanis of this forum.

Beta
Kashmir issue is international, it is disputed and in UN
dont be too apologist just because you are in Norway

 

[VCheng]

Kashmir issue is international, it is disputed and in UN

Sir, is that still true after Simla? Why does the UN refuse to get involved unless both India and Pakistan agree to its mediation?

 

[Irfan Baloch]

Sir, is that still true after Simla? Why does the UN refuse to get involved unless both India and Pakistan agree to its mediation?

compromise my dear compromise money talks, if Modi can have his name removed from American ban list then there is no surprise that Kashmir goes in the back burner the international Military observers still reside in Kashmir.

I dont think UN ever "refused" to get Involved. resolutions were constantly vetoed by USSR as a punishment for Pakistan joining CENTO and SEATO and American camp.

 

[VCheng]

compromise my dear compromise money talks, if Modi can have his name removed from American ban list then there is no surprise that Kashmir goes in the back burner the international Military observers still reside in Kashmir.

I dont think UN ever "refused" to get Involved. resolutions were constantly vetoed by USSR as a punishment for Pakistan joining CENTO and SEATO and American camp.

I think the statement of Ban Ki-Moon is on record on this matter Sir. But you are right, economic strength talks loudly in international circles, as always.

"United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon told Mail Today on Friday that the world body is willing to mediate in the Kashmir issue "if so requested" by both concerned parties. Ban said that the "good offices" of the world body would be available for the purpose."


UN chief Ban Ki-moon offers to help resolve Kashmir tensions as Modi's arrival in New York is marred by U.S. court summons | Daily Mail Online