iajj
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
- Messages
- 1,273
- Reaction score
- -20
- Country
- Location
Of course. However, delaying Dr. Afridi's day in court beyond what is needed to at least lay down the charges would only serve to undermine Pakistan's reputation, that is all.
Also, wait and see is a good approach here too, may be he will be released as a bargaining chip, or won't he? What do you think?
pakistani judiciary's reputation is going to be actually boosted by an infinite delay of the trial - it shows that this is an extraordinary matter (which it is, given that u.s. assassination of OBL - which pakistanis didn't mind - took place on pakistani soil in a brazen attack on pakistani sovereignty - which every pakistani must mind - and that the physician took part in a conspiracy against his own nation) and that judicially normal procedures can and must be suspended to cope with matters as serious, as extraordinary, as extra-legal as this. it is always judicially provided that threat to sovereignty and nationhood be dealt with with suspension of juridical normalcy, and the benting of normal rules - infinite detention, infinite delay of the trial, torture, secrecy of the trial, etc. - only serves the purpose of restoring the affronted sovereign, and this ultimately adds more authority, respectability and honor to the judiciary arm itself that has suspended its normal operation. needless to say, u.s. has already done this to a more exaggerated scale than pakistan since 9/11
if you don't know the jurisprudence behind an act of legality through its self-suspension, i guess you shouldn't have pretended to be concerned about the integrity of pakistani judiciary just now. but i know it was pakistani sovereignty and nationhood you wanted to smear all along, wasn't it, cheng?