Pakistan seeks support for UNSC seat, US Opposes

[I spikes therefore I am]

I support Miss Khar .
Will that count ?

I am with you . She is mrs not miss but v missed her fine. No more argument Hina asked so definitely UN should consider this issue if possible India can support her . Making pretty woman like Hina to cry is not gud actually its a sin try to understand. cool.......

don't think pakistan seeking non permanent membership just think Hina is asking .....

 

[OrionHunter]

Support you for permanent membership? No, they voted for your NON-permanent membership.

The world still is wondering till today on what basis China got permanent membership to the UNSC in the first place?

 

[OrionHunter]

Yeah....Wikipedia huh?

Good move by you to make Wikipedia your prime source

More trustworthy and unbiased, unlike your Pakistan Times, Daily Express, Kashmir Express, Times of Pakistan and so on....where you guys consider them as the last word in authentic reporting!! Their reporters and editors don't even have basic education! Sheeesh!

 

[KHIte]

Yeah....Wikipedia huh?

Good move by you to make Wikipedia your prime source

and wikipedia is the main org getting indian there

 

[Awesome]

Except for Pakistan, nobody cares about Kashmir. But the whole world is Sh1t scared about Pakistan, a county which has single handedly made the world a more dangerous place. So we are expecting the world supports India's UNSC seat at least to show a giant middle finger to Pakistan.

The issue raised there was about hypocrisy. Where Pakistan has its issues (making of other nations as much as ours) it has the biggest contribution in rectifying those issues as well. That makes us uniquely qualified to understand global issues and do something about it.

Moreover we need the UNSC position to make sure the strategic vision of the UN is directed towards the same aims as what Pakistan is stating it would do with the position. As Ms (not Miss) Khar pointed out, Pakistan is offering its efforts and services, not after some tamgha (award) or status symbol like permanent seat or veto powers.

 

[notsuperstitious]

Pakistan and India have served in the UNSC for almost the same amount of years.

---------- Post added at 08:58 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:56 AM ----------



Where are the questions about India's own candidature when asking for the UNSC permanent seat on one hand and burying murdered Kashmiris in Mass graves on the other?

Because there are no mass graves, but graves of unidentified people.

There's a difference, in the eyes of those who are not victims of their own propaganda.

Let me admit, nine of them are somewhere outside Mumbai too, in case Pakistan wishes to use that for propaganda.

 

[Jango]

More trustworthy and unbiased, unlike your Pakistan Times, Daily Express, Kashmir Express, Times of Pakistan and so on....where you guys consider them as the last word in authentic reporting!! Their reporters and editors don't even have basic education! Sheeesh!

Nah, i dont prefer those all sources you gave there, i have not even heard them before to be honest.


Wikipedia is good for things like principles and theories and some knowledge related subjects, but for things like these, military advancements and wars and all that, bias can sometimes get in.

 

[AMRITSAR]

well, TBH, Pakistan is currently the bigger player in the world than Kyrgyzstan, but , they have a better economy and a better environment for themselves at the world stage.

Bias will be a big factor, so Kyrgyzstan will win.

biggest player..... what your country is contributing towards world except terrorism?

 

[fast and furious]

I am with you . She is mrs not miss but v missed her fine. No more argument Hina asked so definitely UN should consider this issue if possible India can support her . Making pretty woman like Hina to cry is not gud actually its a sin try to understand. cool.......

don't think pakistan seeking non permanent membership just think Hina is asking .....

See partner its women libero who insist that Ms. is used for the women just like Mr. is used for guys.

Anyway-I supported her cause a non-permanent seat might get her additional discounts on the Guccis,Boss,Ck etc.
None sight better than seeing a woman excited about her shoppimg discounts.

 

[Jango]

biggest player..... what your country is contributing towards world except terrorism?

We have a major say in world terrorism operations, we have more of a say in counter piracy, we have more of a influence in the current atmosphere in world security than Kyrgyzstan.

 

[Quick MIK]

India is supporting kyrgyzstan because of a mutual agreement.

 

[AMRITSAR]

We have a major say in world terrorism operations, we have more of a say in counter piracy, we have more of a influence in the current atmosphere in world security than Kyrgyzstan.

this is not a "say" but it is "compulsion"(After 9/11 Bush made a call to then Gen. Musharff that cooperate us on teror othwise i will bomb you to stoneage).Drone attcks on the FATA region is also your compulsion not a say.

 

[karan.1970]

We have a major say in world terrorism operations, we have more of a say in counter piracy, we have more of a influence in the current atmosphere in world security than Kyrgyzstan.

Really?? Do you have a veto power to decide/over rule targets selected by terror groups across the world..??

Or did you mean anti terrorism operations?

 

[Don't know]

P5, will they support?

China alone can kick you out of the contest.

Have a look ..
List of members of the United Nations Security Council - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

sorry its 13 times so whats your point ,i didn't seen any point on that article of wikipedia.if you want see something which support my claim of 187 out of 190 member and P5.please type bid for permanent membership for UNSC in google and check the artilcle of wikipedia because i don't know how two link two page

 

[Don't know]

No they don't.

Check the actual statement made by the Chinese foreign ministry. The actual statement was "We support your aspirations to play a greater role in the UN"... which was vague enough so that it could have meant anything, from a peacekeeping role to any of the other functions that occur in the UN.

Even your own media reported the same thing:



China backs India in UNSC, vaguely - Times Of India

please type bid for permanent membership in UNSC in google and i am sure that you will come out from illusion