Pakistan seeks explanation about Inu's Baluchistan remarks

[RISING SUN]

Its called poking nose on internal matters

Whose? Pakistan doing in Baluchistan? Are native Balochi people any less Balochi if they oppose Pakistan? We are not asking for separation of Pakistan, if that happens unfortunately, that will be the doing of local people only. Other factors can only work if internal fractions are there opposite to each other.

 

[monitor]

well he won't get 500 votes if he takes part in the election independently. He is allied with Hasina. Hasina is allied with 14 others parties as well. They don't have the vote, but name of a political party

Also This one is a hypocrite..When pro Pakistan Coup took place against Mujib He danced on the road. Photographs are available.

Is he a minister and thus representative of your govt/country or not?

Stop beating around the bush.

A street dog like Inu have no value in Bangladesh his party is nonexistence. What he told were just to satisfy his master in India. I read somewhere he took just Tk. 30000 'or 400 dollar for attending a meeting so I'm not talking his talks seriously until any govt explanation. Moreover Bangladesh would need to change it's constitution for any support to baluchistan.

 

[Nilgiri]

Its called poking nose on internal matters

and Pakistan is not known to do this?

A street dog like Inu have no value in Bangladesh his party is nonexistence. What he told were just to satisfy his master in India. I read somewhere he took just Tk. 30000 'or 400 dollar for attending a meeting so I'm not talking his talks seriously until any govt explanation. Moreover Bangladesh would need to change it's constitution for any support to baluchistan.

He is a minister whether you like it or not.

If he is such a character, why don't BDeshis come out in masse and protest what he said and that he should resign etc?

He has spoken for you country, why not demonstrate at least in the weekend sometime?

 

[bdslph]

That internal affair of pakistan period

And also as far as i knw there are terrorist there sadly a lot of them

 

[kobiraaz]

He has spoken for you country, why not demonstrate at least in the weekend sometime?

We are busy developing ourselves.

 

[volatile]

and Pakistan is not known to do this?

Not openly

Whose? Pakistan doing in Baluchistan? Are native Balochi people any less Balochi if they oppose Pakistan? We are not asking for separation of Pakistan, if that happens unfortunately, that will be the doing of local people only. Other factors can only work if internal fractions are there opposite to each other.

you even dont know how much balochi`s are in Balochistan a province dominated with Pakhtoons and lolz you are debating on this topic

 

[Nilgiri]

Not openly

When you talk about Indian kashmir the way you do a lot, you are doing exactly that openly.

 

[volatile]

When you talk about Indian kashmir the way you do a lot, you are doing exactly that openly.

Kashmir is not an indian internal matter its an international issue being recognized by UN

 

[Nilgiri]

Kashmir is not an indian internal matter its an international issue being recognized by UN

UN also asked you to withdraw your troops from P0K.

If you didnt follow them back then, you cannot fall back upon them when it suits you to do so.

Besides it only matters to us what we define as an internal issue....not anyone else.

 

[volatile]

UN also asked you to withdraw your troops from P0K.

Both India n Pak

Besides it only matters to us what we define as an internal issue....not anyone else.

This is highly delusional statement and childish ,since you are saying this in ignorance world moves with laws and norms at times these laws are not followed due to some one being some ones else weapon but that doesn't take it away ,So in the end you realized there are UN resolutions on Kashmir and International community has noticed all this . So Sue CHina ,Turkey ,US ,EU ,OIC all there statments are on Kashmir

PS India is not Israel nor Pak a de facto Arab state and Kashmir is not Palestine

 

[Nilgiri]

Both India n Pak

The clear step 1 was Pakistan since it was the aggressor.

Step 2 was once India felt the situation was stabilised, it would then withdraw and let a referendum be held.

Pakistan did not comply with step 1.....so further steps could not be done and we have todays situation.

This is highly delusional statement and childish ,since you are saying this in ignorance world moves with laws and norms at times these laws are not followed due to some one being some ones else weapon but that doesn't take it away ,So in the end you realized there are UN resolutions on Kashmir and International community has noticed all this . So Sue CHina ,Turkey ,US ,EU ,OIC all there statments are on Kashmir

PS India is not Israel nor Pak a de facto Arab state and Kashmir is not Palestine

Don't care what you or any others say/think....what matters is our definition on it and it is not up for any sort of bargaining or interpretation by anyone else.

Again you bring up UN resolutions when it was Pakistan that initially chose not to follow the very first one....and then later signed the Simla agreement anyway (making UN or any third party redundant). So sorry, UN resolutions do not apply unless Pakistan is in the habit of ignoring what it has signed on its own whim and fancy....in which case maybe India should do the same for IWT and other things it has signed and agreed to be a party of?

You either back up with words and actions what you have signed and commited to, or prepare to face the consequences of showing that anything you sign is potentially meaningless....and thus you cannot be trusted.

Besides statements like this one are coming out now:

http://indianexpress.com/article/in...ndia-says-us-hizbul-burhan-encounter-2908055/

 

[Great Sachin]

 

[kobiraaz]

We should not look into Kashmir and Balochistan Issue. Because We are too insignificant. I agree to this. However We should look into Rohingya cause Not because They are Muslim Not Because They are Bengali but for Humanitarian reasons. They have no one else nothing else except Running toward Bangladesh Border

 

[volatile]

l

Don't care what you or any others say/think....what matters is our definition on it and it is not up for any sort of bargaining or interpretation by anyone else.

Again you bring up UN resolutions when it was Pakistan that initially chose not to follow the very first one....and then later signed the Simla agreement anyway (making UN or any third party redundant). So sorry, UN resolutions do not apply unless Pakistan is in the habit of ignoring what it has signed on its own whim and fancy....in which case maybe India should do the same for IWT and other things it has signed and agreed to be a party of?

You either back up with words and actions what you have signed and commited to, or prepare to face the consequences of showing that anything you sign is potentially meaningless....and thus you cannot be trusted.

Besides statements like this one are coming out now:

letting go Kashmir in 1948 was a big mistake and trusting UN was also but that doesn't mean that Kashmir is India`s internal matter its international disputed LOC

AN eye opener

 

[Nilgiri]

letting go Kashmir in 1948 was a big mistake and trusting UN was also but that doesn't mean that Kashmir is India`s internal matter its international disputed LOC

Yes it was a big mistake that India did. We resolved never to leave a job half done again or "trusting the UN" as we saw in early 70s.

You can ask yourself why did Pakistan not follow the first step of UN resolution to run a plebiscite?