Pakistan renews security assurance to Saudi Arabia

[CHI RULES]

Yes clearly, you are looking at things without the sectarian glasses, and as long as we blame Iran for every thing you are cool right.

1) How many of our Sunni Muslims (we will leave the undesired shia Muslim out of this) in Gulf states make the same money as white people and get treated the same?

2) Iranians are under sanctions Einstein, How are they going to give you a job, when they can barley afford themselves.

3) So Saudi financed terrorist in Pakistan bad, Saudi financed Terrorist in Syria good and yes clearly you are neutral.


Famous words of KKK members" I am not racist, I just don't like colored people".

Mr Einstein Iran even with sanctions had better economy than Pakistan and now sanctions have been relaxed. If they can provide jobs to hundreds of Shia Pros better jobs in Iran than why not Sunnis. Mr I was told about indecent behaviour of Irani authorities with Sunnis by a Shia himself.
On the other hand I have many Shia and Wahabi friends and I don;t call either of party as Kafir. These are Shia and Wahabi Alims who due to their false pride declare other Muslims as non Muslims.

What about videos on social media about Zanbia Brigade funded by Iran having Pak persons in Syria.

You yourself is either ignorant about ground realities or no more than a sectarian vulture like people who have divided whole Ummah on sectarian basis. I am proud to be Muslim but have no affiliation with any sect to call others as non Muslims untill and unless they do not have believe in Allah and consider Hazrat Muhammad (PBUH) as His last Messenger

I had no intentions to disgrace Iran or Shia sect but when I see innocent blood of Muslims I can't keep my mouth shut. I am ready to call both KSA and Iran Govt as murderers thousand times no matter what consequences I face.

 

[RoadRunner401]

Mr Einstein Iran even with sanctions had better economy than Pakistan and now sanctions have been relaxed. If they can provide jobs to hundreds of Shia Pros better jobs in Iran than why not Sunnis. Mr I was told about indecent behaviour of Irani authorities with Sunnis by a Shia himself.
On the other hand I have many Shia and Wahabi friends and I don;t call either of party as Kafir. These are Shia and Wahabi Alims who due to their false pride declare other Muslims as non Muslims.

What about videos on social media about Zanbia Brigade funded by Iran having Pak persons in Syria.

You yourself is either ignorant about ground realities or no more than a sectarian vulture like people who have divided whole Ummah on sectarian basis. I am proud to be Muslim but have no affiliation with any sect to call others as non Muslims until and unless they do not have believe in Allah and consider Hazrat Muhammad (PBUH) as His last Messenger

I had no intentions to disgrace Iran or Shia sect but when I see innocent blood of Muslims I can't keep my mouth shut. I am ready to call both KSA and Iran Govt as murderers thousand times no matter what consequences I face.

Most of your post, I can't answer because it's full of personal delusion or out right lies.Below is my all time personal favorite and quote↓↓

I have many Shia and Wahabi friends

It seems any time a person says or does something that is racist, the excuse to quickly follow is something along the lines of, “I'm not racist, I have a black best friend!” Or in Pakistani case, I am not extremist, my best friend whose name i forgot is a shia.

Reading Posts from members like you, I am starting to see why India is progressing while on the other side of the Border race to bottom is in full progress.

 

[CHI RULES]

Most of your post, I can't answer because it's full of personal delusion or out right lies.Below is my all time personal favorite and quote↓↓



It seems any time a person says or does something that is racist, the excuse to quickly follow is something along the lines of, “I'm not racist, I have a black best friend!” Or in Pakistani case, I am not extremist, my best friend whose name i forgot is a shia.

Reading Posts from members like you, I am starting to see why India is progressing while on the other side of the Border race to bottom is in full progress.

I am not white myself and consider myself a humble human being but not ignorant like u perhaps despite living in Canada. Further what about Zanbia Force made by Iran and operating in Syria just like few Saudi funded mercenaries from Pak are operating on opposite side.

I don't see any hatred towrds any sect in my words rather I am requesting u and others to come out of their sectarian circle without knowing about ur sect or even religion.

You can get hundreds of mails from same forum of Shia members abusing Wahabis and same is the case with other party. You can't deny fact that Iran was key player in Lebanon war, similar is case in Behrain, Yemen and in Syria. I am against the bloody in human acts of both sides.

By the Grace of Almighty I have at least visited almost whole of my country and ready to shed my blood for this country and for Islam but not for any particular sect.

 

[HAIDER]

Pakistan renews security assurance to Saudi Arabia
THE NEWSPAPER'S STAFF REPORTER—
WHATSAPP
74 COMMENTS
PRINT
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan renewed on Tuesday its security assurance to Saudi Arabia following a string of bomb blasts in the kingdom by extremists, including one outside Masjid-i-Nabwi in Madina, the second-holiest site in Islam.

The government “reiterates its abiding commitment to the safety, security and territorial integrity of Saudi Arabia,” the Foreign Office said in a statement on terrorist attacks in Madina, Qatif and Jeddah on Monday.

The Jeddah attack was carried out by a Pakistani expat whereas the attacks in Madina and Qatif were reported to have been executed by Saudi nationals.

The renewal of security assurance was made public by the Foreign Office after a telephonic conversation between Army Chief Gen Raheel Sharif and Saudi Defence Minster Prince Muhammad bin Salman.

“The COAS sympathised with affected families of attack victims and said we stand shoulder to shoulder with our Saudi brothers in fighting the menace of terrorism,” the ISPR said in a statement.

Islamabad has an agreement with Riyadh guaranteeing kingdom’s security
Pakistan has a longstanding agreement with Saudi Arabia guaranteeing the kingdom’s security. The understanding last year came into question when Pakistan did not send troops for joining the kingdom’s invasion of Yemen. But Islamabad later made amends by joining a Saudi-led 34 nation military alliance against terrorism even though it kept claiming for long that it was not clear about its details.

Both Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and the army chief had in March this year travelled to Saudi Arabia to witness the inaugural exercises of the alliance, which were also attended by Pakistani troops.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Sharif, in a statement issued by his office, called for unity among Muslim countries in the fight against terrorism and extremism.

“Ummah in particular needs to forge unity at this critical moment to foil the nefarious designs of enemies of humanity and Ummah. We need to renew collective efforts to fight the menace of terrorism,” Mr Sharif said.

Emphasising the unity in the fight against terrorism, he recalled the attacks by militants, mostly belonging to the Islamic State group, in Turkey, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Bangladesh during Ramazan.

The statement said Mr Sharif had emphasised on unity in counter-terrorism efforts “in the wake of increasing acts of terrorism and extremism across the continents”.

Published in Dawn, July 6th, 2016


WHATSAPP
74 COMMENTS
PRINT

Who will provide security from Saudi religious extremism in Pakistan ? . Been victim for decades.

Yes that is right. But USA did it in its own interest. It did not want Saudi Oil to fall in Saddam's hand. If Saddam had not attacked Kuwait, he would still be alive today. It was his wrong judgement which led to his disaster. There is a lesson for us. We should use our judgement very carefully.

GCC support Saddam and become silent , when he killed his own millions of people. Unfortunately ,when hate is so deep rooted.

 

[BRAVO_]

GCC support Saddam and become silent , when he killed his own millions of people. Unfortunately ,when hate is so deep rooted.

Question is after Sadam Hussian does the killing has stopped? iraq under the rule of Saddam was a better place or now it is?

 

[HAIDER]

Question is after Sadam Hussian does the killing has stopped? iraq under the rule of Saddam was a better place or now it is?

Well, his remains still not ready to accept , that they have lost the power. Now they have new face ISIS.

 

[BRAVO_]

Well, his remains still not ready to accept , that they have lost the power. Now they have new face ISIS.

he was removed from power 10 year back and during this one decade no significant development. the majority of then leadership was eithere assassinated or taken in to custody before it was sunni who were ruling and now .. it is shia who is ruling so they are settling their score. the only person who was holding the country stronger was Saddam if you have some better figures historically plz put forward

 

[HAIDER]

he was removed from power 10 year back and during this one decade no significant development. the majority of then leadership was eithere assassinated or taken in to custody before it was sunni who were ruling and now .. it is shia who is ruling so they are settling their score. the only person who was holding the country stronger was Saddam if you have some better figures historically plz put forward

Well, ask Iraqi people. Only 30 or 40 top officials been killed. His republican guards top cream is alive and active.

 

[ajiangkasa]

I Agree with This Statment
"Last time it was USA that defended and saved saudi + kuwiati kingdoms from SADDAM."

 

[RoadRunner401]

Question is after Sadam Hussian does the killing has stopped? iraq under the rule of Saddam was a better place or now it is?

No, the question is who supply and continues to supply weapons, money and training to terrorist in Iraq and now Syria after the fall of Saddam?

Who encouraged Saddam loyalist to pick up arms and start killing?

It's funny how the obvious question is not being asked because the obvious answer will expose the people some desperately want to hide, so instead trying their best to make the defenders look like the aggressors.

 

[CHI RULES]

No, the question is who supply and continues to supply weapons, money and training to terrorist in Iraq and now Syria after the fall of Saddam?

Who encouraged Saddam loyalist to pick up arms and start killing?

It's funny how the obvious question is not being asked because the obvious answer will expose the people some desperately want to hide, so instead trying their best to make the defenders look like the aggressors.

Who pays for Shia Militias and even Kurdish forces obviously all key players are before us i.e finances provided by KSA/GCC and Iran. On the other hand ammos provided to all sides by USA. The whole game is to weaken the Arab countries along with Iran and encourage sectarian conflicts. The benefits to USA include free/cheap oil, sale of Ammo and resultant development in US economy. On the other hand Israel becoming stronger and Egypt has become totally an ally of Israel.
But strange thing is so called Islamic state of Iran is also fully collaborating with USA to make Iraq a Shia state.

 

[Hamza913]

Only old F-16s, I heard Saudis were told, not to let Pakistani trainers touch their F-15s. GCC countries cannot modify nor sell anything unless US permits.

They allegedly let us fly them during the tensions in 2002.

 

[BRAVO_]

Well, ask Iraqi people. Only 30 or 40 top officials been killed. His republican guards top cream is alive and active.

let me clear you some facts my friend...
Iraq is a Shia majority nation i.e. 60% Shias and appx 40% sunnis. Saddam Hussein was a Sunni ruler. He persecuted the Majority Shia population. The US toppled his government and installed a 'democratic' government lead by Shias. This government persecuted the Sunni people and thus the Islamic State received much sympathy and support from Iraq's Sunni population.

Syria, unlike Iraq is a Sunni majority nation. But it's ruler- Assad, is an Alawite. Alawites are a part of the Shia faction of Islam. Assad is not exactly a very benevolent ruler. Moreover, the Sunni Population of Syria are not very fond of a Shia dictator. Thus the Islamic State found support in Syria and has spread considerably in the country.
So the IS is fighting Shia forces, including the Assad government

if you will take a look at deeply you will find some more interesting facts ... Americans are fighting with IS in Iraq but in Syria they are working against Assad by this way they are helping IS. Saudis were once in favor of IS but now it is a threat for them so they have withdraw their support already and put their bet on Al Nusra. so until this sunni shia riffet is existed between people no peace will be restored in any near future. every one know the Iranian involvement in entire crises

according to telegraph almost 700 Iranian soldiers and militia fighters have been killed in Syria’s civil war, laying bare the scale and cost of Tehran’s intervention to preserve Bashar al-Assad’s grip on power.

Officially, Iran maintains that only “military advisers” have been deployed in Syria. But the state media has reported numerous battlefield casualties, with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) disclosing past weeks that 13 of its fighters were killed near Aleppo.

About 2,000 troops from the Quds Force - the special forces wing of the IRGC - are present in Syria, according to the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). In addition, 13 Shia militias have been identified among the forces fighting for Assad’s regime.

The IRGC provides these units with recruits, weapons, training and military planning.......... and yet people are blaming the remains of Saddam for all the mess.... this issue is not as simple as it looks like