What's new

Pakistan Redeploys F-16 Warplanes After ‘its Failure to Counter India’

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nope... thats the Blood... I want to see AGAIN and AGAIAN. Thats an Agression.... Alertnesss... Something PAF Pilots Missed ENTIRELY.... :

1. During OSAMA Raid.. Then AGAIN....
2. on 26th Feb !

Ask yourself... when a man is "shaheed" you feel Proud.. or Humiliated ?

Hehe. Burn saale.

You got owned. We took down your fighters and your pilot. Tasty humiliation.
 
what failure ? 3 din tak indians ke moo se aik lafz nhi nikla . you guys run away after our failure . ye failure tha wow . tum khud kidher ghayeb they 27 ke baad forum se ?:lol:

Ask your Mods... Imran Bhai..... They were bust deleting posts and banned almost all members here. Go Ask them .. Not me...

You lost and the whole world witnessed. Now you beg on a Pakistani forum for recognition LOL

lol.... The whole world knows how your PM has SOLD the whole country to IMF.. n is lying to his own country men Agaian and Again... yet you dare talk about Humiliation ?

This is Real Humiliataion :

https://www.dawn.com/news/1481449
 
Sputnik has taken economic times as a source.... That was enough for me to its credibility... Lolzzzz
Loosers
 
Ask your Mods... Imran Bhai..... They were bust deleting posts and banned almost all members here. Go Ask them .. Not me...
i see 0.00 indians here after 27 hahahahahhhahaha please now stop lying .no one banned 55000 indians to post . but it was great to see how indians were shut up by PAF :lol:

few years you guys will turn 27 battle a victory of india just wait . the kids of today will be posting here in 2029 as indian victory of 27 feb :lol:
 
Pakistan has every right to deploy its forces however it seems feasible...

No body here gives 2 hoots about Wannabe shuper vhuper power
 
i see 0.00 indians here after 27 hahahahahhhahaha please now stop lying .no one banned 55000 indians to post . but it was great to see how indians were shut up by PAF :lol:

few years you guys will turn 27 battle a victory of india just wait . the kids of today will be posting here in 2029 as indian victory of 27 feb :lol:

55000 Indians dont make posts and make arguments at PDF... only a dozen or so.
 
https://sputniknews.com/asia/201905191075129414-india-pakistan-f-16-fighter-jets/

This comes amid ongoing tensions between New Delhi and Islamabad, which escalated after the 14 February Pulwama terrorist attack which killed at least 40 Indian security personnel. The attack, which a Pakistan-based terror outfit claimed responsibility for, was followed by a 26 February Indian airstrike on an alleged terrorist site in Pakistan.

The Pakistan Air Force (PAF) remains concerned over the safety of its F-16 fighter jets despite the fact that two and a half months have passed since an Indian Air Force (IAF) counter-terror strike in Pakistan's Balakot region, the Indian newspaper Economic Times cited government sources as saying.


The sources claimed that after the F-16s were deployed from their home bases in Punjab province, they were sent to satellite fields in a scattered manner in order to avoid major losses in new possible strikes from India.


The PAF also “has been at forward locations all along the Line of Control and the International Border after the Balakot strikes and its failure to counter India”, the sources added.

The developments come against the backdrop of simmering Islamabad-New Delhi tensions, which exacerbated on 14 February when at least 40 Indian security personnel were killed in a terrorist attack in Pulwama, India.

Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), a Pakistan-based terrorist group, claimed responsibility for the attack and the Indian government accused Islamabad of harbouring and sponsoring the Islamist terrorist outfit, a charge which Pakistan has denied.

In response, India conducted the 26 February airstrike on alleged terror infrastructure targets in Pakistani territory; the following day, Pakistan retaliated by conducting airstrikes targeting Indian territory; the ensuing dogfight reportedly downed two aircraft.

A pilot who ejected was released a few days later in what Islamabad called a “peace gesture”. India, however, has confirmed the loss of only one of its warplanes, claiming that its downed MiG-21 Bison jet was struck after it had shot down a Pakistani F-16 during aerial combat.

@Windjammer @Areesh
@Imran Khan
PAKISTAN has the liberty to give sleepless nights to India. What does India have other than false promise of some junk aircraft no one wants namely TEJAS.
 
It looks like that claiming MKI kill has hurt many. :p:
If it was the truth, Trust me.. It would have helped getting a 5th much faster. I would have loved an MKI down... atleast for the sake of Getting 5th Gen Quicker.
 

Features Top Stories
Modi’s silence made Khan win perception battle internationally
March 1, 2019 Millichronicle
6 mins read
by Shrutisagar Yamunan

In a move pitched as a de-escalation measure, Prime Minister Imran Khan on Thursday told Pakistan’s parliament that Abhinandan Varthaman, the Indian Air Force pilot who was captured on Wednesday, would be released as a “gesture of peace”.

The announcement came hours before India’s Cabinet Committee on Security under Prime Minister Narendra Modi was scheduled to meet and about an hour before the three military services were set to address the media. The briefing was rescheduled to 7 pm.

Many Indian TV channels promptly portrayed Khan’s announcement as a victory for the Modi government. For much of the day, they had been reporting, quoting sources in the foreign ministry, that India would not negotiate for Varthaman’s release. This was because, they claimed, Pakistan was trying to create a “Kandahar-like situation” to extort what it wanted by using Varthaman’s release as a bargaining chip. After Khan’s announcement, however, the headlines shifted. “Blackmail falls flat,” screamed a headline on Times Now. “No deal, Pak folds in fear,” said News X.

Which country now has the tactical advantage is a matter of debate. However, despite the narrative of a diplomatic coup by the Modi government being pushed by the news channels, it is clear Pakistan and Khan have taken an innings lead, to use a cricketing metaphor, in the perception battle.

For India, there was irony in Khan’s “gesture of peace”. Pakistan is often derided by critics as a “military state” or a “failed democracy”. Yet, the country’s prime minister announced the release of the Indian pilot on the floor of the parliament.

Imran Khan’s manoeuvre
There was a stark difference in how the prime ministers communicated after the Indian Air Force hit a suspected Jaish-e-Mohammad camp in Balakot on Tuesday.

Khan chaired a meeting of Pakistan’s National Security Committee. In a social media post afterwards, he said the air strike was done “for domestic consumption, being in election environment, putting regional peace and stability at grave risk”.

Another statement put out on Twitter said the National Security Committee had concluded “India has committed uncalled for aggression to which Pakistan shall respond at the time and place of its choosing”. The government also decided to call a session of the parliament, the tweet said.

Forum concluded that India has committed uncalled for aggression to which Pakistan shall respond at the time and place of its choosing.

To take the nation on board, the government has decided to requisition joint session of the Parliament.

— Prime Minister's Office, Pakistan (@PakPMO) February 26, 2019
On Wednesday morning, Pakistani fighter jets crossed the Line of Control and, as per a statement from the Indian foreign ministry, targeted military installations. Indian aircraft were scrambled. They reportedly shot down one F-16 jet of Pakistan. In this aerial battle, Varthaman’s jet was shot down. He ejected and fell inside Pakistan Occupied Kashmir, and was arrested. In what India described as a violation of the Geneva Conventions, Pakistan released videos of the pilot being taken into custody and being interrogated.

A few hours later, Khan addressed his nation, calling for peace. Invoking the danger of a nuclear war, he asked India if the two neighbours could afford a miscalculation and offered talks.

I ask India; with our weapons capability…on both sides, can we afford a miscalculation? It will neither be in my control nor Modi’s. The hurt that has been caused due to the Pulwama attack, we want to come to the table and talk about terrorism that effects us both.

– PM Khan

— Prime Minister's Office, Pakistan (@PakPMO) February 27, 2019
Soon after, the media reported that India had handed over a dossier on the Pulwama attack to Pakistan and conveyed that it expected strong and verifiable action from the neighboring country.

On Thursday, there were signs that the international community was getting into the act to calm the battling neighbours down. In Vietnam, United States President Donald Trump said: “We have been involved in trying to help them stop and we have some reasonably decent news.”

In the morning, Saudi Arabia’s ambassador in New Delhi, Saud Mohammed Al-Sati, met Modi. It was a significant development since diplomats are generally briefed at the level of the foreign ministry. In the meantime, Pakistan’s media reported that the Saudi foreign minister was visiting Islamabad on Friday with an “important message” from his government.

At around 4 pm, Khan addressed Pakistan’s parliament and announced the Indian pilot would be released on Friday as a gesture of peace. In the same breath, he said this decision should not be seen as a sign of Pakistan’s weakness.

"Our efforts to de-escalate should not be considered our weakness. We are indulging our efforts to maintain peace in the region."

Prime Minister Imran Khan address to join session of Parliament @ImranKhanPTI pic.twitter.com/1psp0oYOLj

— Prime Minister's Office, Pakistan (@PakPMO) February 28, 2019
Narendra Modi’s response
In contrast to the hands-on approach with which Pakistan’s prime minister dealt with the fast-moving developments, Modi let foreign ministry officials deal with the media. Even Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, who was at the forefront defending the government against allegations of corruption in the Rafale deal, went silent.

On Tuesday, just hours after the Balakot strike, Modi chose to address a rally at Churu in Rajasthan, where he broke into poetry, drawing loud cheers from the audience. “I swear on this soil that I will never allow the nation to perish,” he said.

In the evening, Modi took a ride on the Delhi Metro and unveiled a copy of the Bhagavad Gita at the ISKCON temple in New Delhi.

There was no statement from Modi even after the Pakistan Air Force targeted Indian military installations on Wednesday. Yet again, foreign ministry officials were fielded to address the press without taking any questions. The Indian Air Force officer who accompanied the foreign ministry official at the press briefing was a mere spectator.

On Thursday, despite criticism from the Opposition, Modi addressed a Bharatiya Janata Party programme.

A study in contrast
It is nobody’s argument that the government should reveal all details of its military operations. That would be out of sync with the country’s strategic interests. It is also true that India was put in a difficult position by Pakistan’s capture of the pilot. This required mature handling and given Trump’s statement, it was clear that backdoor diplomatic initiatives were ongoing.

There is still no justification for Modi choosing not to address the nation even when tensions with Pakistan were rapidly escalating. As the Opposition pointed out, Modi decided to not even chair a meeting of all political parties. Making matters worse was the triumphalism of BJP leaders. Former Karnataka Chief Minister BS Yeddyurappa said the strike on Pakistan would benefit the BJP in the upcoming Lok Sabha election. BJP chief Amit Shah invoked it to take potshots at the Opposition in Uttar Pradesh. “Who can ensure security of the country?” he asked. “The people of the alliance or Modi ji. Who can give a fitting reply to Pakistan? Who can wipe out terrorism?”

The government’s reluctance to field senior ministers to face the press put the three military services in a precarious position of answering questions that are strictly in the domain of the civilian administration. For example, the first question to the Air Force official on Thursday was whether the attempt by Pakistan to target military installations in Jammu and Kashmir amounted to an “act of war”. The official tackled the question diplomatically but, in any responsible democracy, it is for the civilian government to determine what constitutes an act of war.

Had the prime minister taken the initiative to communicate proactively, it would have added heft to India’s attempt to pin Pakistan down, not least because it used weapons systems the United States had barred it from using in any circumstances other than fighting terrorism. By not taking the initiative, Modi allowed Pakistan’s prime minister to steal a march in the perception stakes.

Article first published on Scroll.in
 
Pakistan has every right to deploy its forces however it seems feasible...

No body here gives 2 hoots about Wannabe shuper vhuper power

But where.. is the Money ?
 
We have redeployed some mijjiles aj well... May b sputnik missed out on that

But where.. is the Money ?


We don't intend to through dollars at sukhois
 
We have redeployed some mijjiles aj well... May b sputnik missed out on that




We don't intend to through dollars at sukhois


Actually, If you feel US wanted to counter Missile for Missle....They would have a far different approach for Russia.. Iran or N. Korea... How "economically" USA has crippled them.. is outstanding.

Welcome to the 4th Gen... Economic Warfare.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom