King Solomon
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2011
- Messages
- 2,990
- Reaction score
- 0
I dont understand this bro.
You want Pakistan to claw back conventional parity via tac nukes?
India is very clear. We do not make the differentiation between a tactical strike versus a strategic one.
Nor do we make the differentiation between civilian Indian nuclear casualties and military ones.
Or Indian soil, or foreign, or our own waters or international waters.
A nuclear strike, a nuclear launch, will bring retaliation.
And it will not be measured or pro-rated per the decision of the enemy.
I was not speaking in the context of a first strike... My point is, suppose a conventional conflict escalates to a nuclear one. Both india and pakistan exchanges their strategic nuclear weapons to major military bases (perhaps some to major cities). What happens after that?
The fact is, India would still have significant military and economic capability in that situation. Pakistan less so. In that situation, the only way for pakistan to show some resistance would be to use tactical nuclear weapons during battlefield combat.