‘Pakistan Navy fully capable of defending country’s long coast’

[Ultima Thule]

I am a pakistani my friend I don't believe in internet posts and what the west is saying. I only believe in the stuff proven in front of us and in battle field. That is why Pakistan has defended it's self from an enemy 3 time it's size we don't consider every glowing thing as gold. and please I am trying to have a discussion with some one with knowledge don't bring in internet post here.

and your Gutter thinking worth nothing Mr @BHarwana this system is the one of the system that can intercept supersonic anti ship missile Chinese FL-3000, US RAM, UK CAMM and Russian BukM3,

I don't believe in internet posts

so why are you using internet shut down immediately @BHarwana

 

[SipahSalar]

The first statement shows your stupidity in trying to combat the credibility (established by the forum administration and by the peers I know rather than fastest poster “Senior” members like you)

I am well aware on what basis 'credibility' was handed out in 2009. It was on the basis of command of english language rather than anything else.
As for fast posting. I don't know who is posting more, the guy with 2700 posts over 4 years or the guy with 27,000 posts over 9 years. I'd let 'credible' geniuses like you do the math.

Please find the CM-400AKG in any records in transfers.

Please find the Turbojet/Turbofan motors powering our cruise missiles in any records of transfers.

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

Yes it do but I want to keep nukes out of this discussion and do it on conventional war terms.

At the end of the day, the Bomb and Missile is the ultimate arbiter in the equation!!! Now the Turkish intelligentsia is beseeching "take 50% of the budget but make the Bomb" - belated understanding of the Pak version "eat grass but get the Bomb".....

 

[Trango Towers]

Logic went out the window when you said 15 BrahMos would end the PN. I could effectively turn the tables and ask you which IN ships are capable of stopping a Mach 4 CM-400 AKG. But why bother.

Trouble with Indians is they think we won't fire back

 

[BHarwana]

@Oscar Currently the Russian pantsir s1 and chinese FM 90 N and Phalanx CIWS are the only tested systems and proven systems against missiles. Phalanx CIWS failed against exocet missile in UK Argentinian war resulting in the destruction of 2 Royal Navy ships. FM 90n is a proven platform against cruise missiles and pantsir provided a success rate of 50% in Israeli attack on Syria out of 4 missiles 2 were taken out successfully.

 

[Safriz]

SIPRI did say few years ago there are 50 CM-400AKG ordered by PAF.
While people here are claiming there are zero.
Oh well.

 

[BHarwana]

At least Pakistan has one proven system. In case Pakistan attacks India has what? If you look at conflicts around the world @Oscar only short range systems have been successful and long range systems have mostly failed. In the current ME war the biggest lesson was the missile defence systems and which ones did best were short range systems.

SIPRI did say few years ago there are 50 CM-400AKG ordered by PAF.
While people here are claiming there are zero.
Oh well.

Yes Pakistan has them here is the image of one with JF-17

 

[Ultima Thule]

@Oscar Currently the Russian pantsir s1 and chinese FM 90 N and Phalanx CIWS are the only tested systems and proven systems against missiles. Phalanx CIWS failed against exocet missile in UK Argentinian war resulting in the destruction of 2 Royal Navy ships. FM 90n is a proven platform against cruise missiles and pantsir provided a success rate of 50% in Israeli attack on Syria out of 4 missiles 2 were taken out successfully.

@BHarwana give us that prove FN-90 is proven system, in which battle F-90 intercepts supersonics anti ship missiles PLease @BHarwana show us prove that F-90N can intercept supersonic missiles @BHarwana

 

[Safriz]

At least Pakistan has one proven system. In case Pakistan attacks India has what? If you look at conflicts around the world @Oscar only short range systems have been successful and long range systems have mostly failed. In the current ME war the biggest lesson was the missile defence systems and which ones did best were short range systems.



Yes Pakistan has them here is the image of one with JF-17

No these are display models
Showing which and which weapons can be bought for use with this aircraft.
It doesn't show that PAF has them.
However SIPRI reports are as credible as they get and they did say 50 of those are in PAF inventory.

 

[MULUBJA]

15 Brahmos are all that is needed to end the surface capacity of the PN at its current state.
Three sorties from Strike aircraft with that weapon can keep the IN from simply not even bothering to come close to the A2/AD assets and setting a blockade a good distance away from the coasts.

Hi Oscy but now Brahmos is going to be tested fro 800 km Range and it does not need any naval platform to reach Gwadar. More over it can be fired from su 30 MKI which can release it from safe stand off range. Have you considered this scenario in your mind?

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Navy is fully cognisance of its responsibilities in the wake of gigantic China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) as the maritime activities in waters adjoining the coast of Balochistan would be enhanced many fold down the line in months and years to come.

It has been transpired in a briefing given to the senior media persons on Tuesday by the Public Relations department/spokesman of Pakistan Navy here in Islamabad. The Navy under its new Chief Admiral Zafar Mahmood Abbasi has prepared itself for the challenges ahead since it is fully capable of defending Pakistan’s long coast.

The spokesman of the Navy reminded that the present role of the Naval Force couldn’t be underestimated since more than ninety percent of import and export is carried out through waters. These trade routes have throughout been kept safe. The safety and security of the shipping channels is ensured by the Pakistan Navy.

The spokesman made it clear that Navy has improved its capacity to secure the maritime interest of the country with the development of CPEC. Gwadar would be hub of future shipping in the region and it would be safest port equipped with most sophisticated facilities for shipping in the region, he said. He said that Pakistan Navy recently helped marooned people in Sri Lanka and received laurel by the president of that country and other leaders while its ships have been providing comforting services to the coastal areas of Africa regularly.






https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/27...lly-capable-of-defending-country-s-long-coast

This is very obvious. No armed forces will say that they are not capable of defending the country.

 

[Trango Towers]

At least Pakistan has one proven system. In case Pakistan attacks India has what? If you look at conflicts around the world @Oscar only short range systems have been successful and long range systems have mostly failed. In the current ME war the biggest lesson was the missile defence systems and which ones did best were short range systems.



Yes Pakistan has them here is the image of one with JF-17

Indian systems are very capable if operational and deployed using well trained men. Having said that Pakistan with jf17 and migrates using air to air refuelling and anti ship missiles can maintains a long range deterrence forcing Indian navy to operate from much further leading to aerial combat duels for air dominance. The outcome of This duel will determine the outcome of naval engagement on the surface. Let's not forget the underwater capabilities

 

[BHarwana]

Hi Oscy but now Brahmos is going to be tested fro 800 km Range and it does not need any naval platform to reach Gwadar. More over it can be fired from su 30 MKI which can release it from safe stand off range. Have you considered this scenario in your mind?

This is very obvious. No armed forces will say that they are not capable of defending the country.

I think you Indians have forgotten Dwarka here is a reminder of it.

 

[MULUBJA]

I think you Indians have forgotten Dwarka here is a reminder of it.

No we remember that too very well you came from ling way and failed to do any damage to any of our major facility and could attack only a town which was of no military significance. We wont mind if you do it again.

 

[BHarwana]

No we remember that too very well you came from ling way and failed to do any damage to any of our major facility and could attack only a town which was of no military significance. We wont mind if you do it again.

What got your *** on fire now lol. here remember it again my friend we took you your whole city and whole base. RADAR and whole Air base. Till time stands this was the biggest coastal attack after Pearl Harbor

 

[Corona]

I think you Indians have forgotten Dwarka here is a reminder of it.

Ah my friend, how is Dwarka of any relevance here? I could just as well quote operations Python and Trident, both of which resulted in heavier damages.