Correct.
India can't take GB without extremely damaging India--at least India's northwest--in a conventional war without even involving nukes. Also, has anyone looked at what taking GB would mean for India?? Just look at the geography! GB is broadly hugged by parts of Pakistan who would slaughter and slaughter the 'invading Hindus' forever. All that without China getting involved on Pakistan's side which is almost a certainty, going by the events of the last few years.
And frankly, India is a third world, resource starved, over-populated dirty country and most Pakistanis wouldn't see any 'benefit' of being part of that. I mean no disrespect. I know Pakistan is not great either. But, knowing human nature, who'd want to be part of a Mexico vs America?? In this case, both India and Pakistani are the Mexico. Plus add in religious hostilities which seem so entrenched in the Subcontinent!!
It should really sink into the ruling class of India that it is better to seek an 'honorable peace' which Pakistan is asking for right now.
Irrespective of whether India is rich or poor, there is not any incentive for India or Pakistan to change the border...Neither India nor Pakistan are able to provide any quality of life to their major population in the current stage.
I do not think, the Indian political class is really interested in any further inroad to Kashmir...All this noise of taking GB and other parts of Kashmir is just for the sake of TV debate only....But it is also true, India will not compromise any kind of its ownership wrt to its own JK. So Pakistan needs peace, LOC has to be converted to an IB...That is the only possible solution for Kashmir.