I think you're really trying to tell me something else. I'm so sorry. I suppose you must feel totally frustrated and that it's useless to take an honest stand. Yet people have done just that in the past...
In his book
Fear No Evil Natan Sharansky tells the story of how, while a Soviet political prisoner, another inmate approached him and confessed that he was a KGB informant. (The informant felt safe doing so because everybody knew that Sharansky had nothing to do with the KGB.) The informant wanted to escape the KGB's clutches. Escaping the KGB was hard enough in "freedom" but how could one do it in a prison camp?
Sharansky got together as many prisoners as he could and his young friend made a public confession, supplying every detail he could. That severely damaged the local KGB network, of course. But because the KGB worked secretly there wasn't much they could do to punish their very public former informant; if they touched him that would only serve as confirmation of his account. So the young man went back to being a prisoner like the others; he sacrificed his special foods and cigarettes to clear his conscience.
Ex-Soviet Spy "Viktor Suvorov" confirms the method in his books: if you want to denounce tyranny it must be exposed as publicly as possible. Doing so robs tyranny of its power of secrecy and even initiative.