What's new

Pakistan Issues Another NOTAM Warning

. . . .
Sir tukka tha. I am 100% sure that I am wrong.
Bahi theres nothing wrong in that... just letting you know k Taimoor or Tipu SLVs thi as far as I know..
From surface to water (to check and validate range and other parameters).
Bahi it has launch point in it as well.. which is in water..
 
. .
Just no.

You are attaching more significance to the test than there is.

If you want to indulge your fantasies, you may look forward to air force's SLV.
 
.
The Russian SAM Systems have the capability to take out hypersonic weapons. At least that is what is claimed, and I hope that it's true. As for india, those guys can be expected to screw up even with Rafales, S-400s or even F-22 Raptors. One thing is for certain and or utmost priority for Pakistan, is the successful development and deployment of MIRV and HGV. In the same breath, a comprehensive and layered ADN is also needed on a priority basis.
 
.
Just no.

You are attaching more significance to the test than there is.

If you want to indulge your fantasies, you may look forward to air force's SLV.

Did you miss the part when I said "maybe". Read next time....

Here, no spoiler just plain English for you, extra large font.

MAYBE
 
Last edited:
.
and also let me busted the myth of targetting Israel... Musharaf ROLLED BACK Pakistan's ICBM program under US pressure...


You can't fire with 180 degrees... the flight highly dependent on the payload. Hence, Shaheen III can't reach where Pakistanis want lol


View attachment 710410
What if i say 4500....

Don't want to spoon feed you bro...check diameter and length of missile and try to calculate the range with research.
 
. .
know body knows about its warhead yield

And no Ababeel warheads are not maneuverable
The reason for the question is because most MIRV warheads are thermonuclear in the range of 170-200 kT ( W62 and W52, US models). The Russian ones are massive with with up to 750 kT yields on the R-36 series missiles.
Some say the US MIRVs are far more precise and semi-maneuverable and thus able to get by with smaller yields.

Pakistan does not have thermonuclear capabilities so its MIRVs would be small tritium boosted compact devices possibly in the range of 200 kT, But this is conjecture. The MIRVs might be much smaller, around 25 kT each.
Even a 25 kT device would surpass the 15 kT "Little Boy" used in Hiroshima. If the Ababeel carries three of these firecrackers then it packs quite a wallop.
 
.
The reason for the question is because most MIRV warheads are thermonuclear in the range of 170-200 kT ( W62 and W52, US models). The Russian ones are massive with with up to 750 kT yields on the R-36 series missiles.
Some say the US MIRVs are far more precise and semi-maneuverable and thus able to get by with smaller yields.

Pakistan does not have thermonuclear capabilities so its MIRVs would be small tritium boosted compact devices possibly in the range of 200 kT, But this is conjecture. The MIRVs might be much smaller, around 25 kT each.
Even a 25 kT device would surpass the 15 kT "Little Boy" used in Hiroshima. If the Ababeel carries three of these firecrackers then it packs quite a wallop.
You ever heard MARV it is the tech of that had been developed before MIRV tech developed
 
.
It is much harder to get from 0-3000km range for a missile. But easier to get from 3000km-8000km since most of the development has been complete and its just a matter of stacking rockets on top of another.
 
.
Karachi FIR
FL260
Or
FL210 but this seems to be for Gujranwala firing range.


How do you calculate it?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom