PAFAce
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 1,637
- Reaction score
- 0
The problem here is not that he criticized dancing, but that he generalized us Pakistanis. He tried to stereotype us. The question asked from him was perfectly valid, and deserved a far better, far more intelligent answer than what it got. Ruling out an entire country from being Muslim simply because you went to one wedding with dancing and music. For every one of these "shameless displays", there may be an act of Faith in Pakistan, but of course, his mind was too closed for that possibility. He only noticed the shameless displays, which tells us more about him than it does about Pakistan.
This "Maulvi" is no scholar, because the most basic thing every scholar recognizes is that there are different kinds of people everywhere, even amongst Muslims. Once again, most defenders of this "Maulvi" chose to ignore my simple question above, we didn't do any of the things he mentioned in our recent family wedding. So are we not Pakistanis then?
Stop defending these types of "scholars" or whatever you want to call them, because then when it comes time to defend real scholars who make credible statements based on extensive research and study, nobody wants to listen to us.
This "Maulvi" is no scholar, because the most basic thing every scholar recognizes is that there are different kinds of people everywhere, even amongst Muslims. Once again, most defenders of this "Maulvi" chose to ignore my simple question above, we didn't do any of the things he mentioned in our recent family wedding. So are we not Pakistanis then?
Stop defending these types of "scholars" or whatever you want to call them, because then when it comes time to defend real scholars who make credible statements based on extensive research and study, nobody wants to listen to us.