What's new

Pakistan Is 'Capital' Of Terrorists: Ex-US Envoy

Well Khalu Khalil you tried your terrorism in Pakistan and failed. You tried your best for Shia Sunni fasad and failed...now just lick your wounds.
 
.
Have you considered that if conflict ends in Afghanistan today, will the security situation in Pakistan improve = No

have you every considered that Pakistan by erecting a barrier, expelling Afghan refugees, investing in Internal security rather than the Army can pretty much insulate itself vis-a-vis Afghanistan like:
1. Turkey vs Syria
2. Israel vs Gaza

I think Pakistan can do that but the issue is that Pakistan is neither Israel nor Turkey.
 
.
The issue is with the idea of arming 'non-state' actors, without any accountability and expect they will do your bidding.
They have their own agenda. So, even if the agenda converges at one point, it differs in many other points.
So, you never know, when that gun is going to be turned against you. Things may look alright today, but can go very very wrong tomorrow.
 
.
The issue is with the idea of arming 'non-state' actors, without any accountability and expect they will do your bidding.
They have their own agenda. So, even if the agenda converges at one point, it differs in many other points.
So, you never know, when that gun is going to be turned against you. Things may look alright today, but can go very very wrong tomorrow.

I agree the blowback is what Pakistan is suffering from now, those groups that were meant to project power outside are coming back to harm Pakistan, for instance the Punjabi Taliban is a good example of such phenomena.
 
.
When terror incident happens in US then only "Pakistan Is 'Capital' Of Terrorists" if it had happens somewhere else then what ?
 
. .
Well Khalu Khalil you tried your terrorism in Pakistan and failed. You tried your best for Shia Sunni fasad and failed...now just lick your wounds.

Here is a neutral view on the subject of the religious divide in Pakistan ( lets ignore the forces behind it for a second ) but
the issue of religious divide is pretty huge I would say, Shia and Sunnis have been killing eachother on the Pakistani soil for years now, Sipah Sahaba, lashkar jhangvi, Sipah-e-Mohammad are not in the business of spreading love if you follow
Then the violence against Ahmadis, Christian groups and others is something pretty substantial and once which Pakistan must contend with
 
. . . .
USA Pakistan are both guilty as each other.

Ajit Doval has said USA has said to pakistan reign in terror groups operating in WEST ... we dont give a shit what they do elsewhere
 
.
.
Here is a neutral view on the subject of the religious divide in Pakistan ( lets ignore the forces behind it for a second ) but
the issue of religious divide is pretty huge I would say, Shia and Sunnis have been killing eachother on the Pakistani soil for years now, Sipah Sahaba, lashkar jhangvi, Sipah-e-Mohammad are not in the business of spreading love if you follow
Then the violence against Ahmadis, Christian groups and others is something pretty substantial and once which Pakistan must contend with

this is how foreign powers incite violence, they create and support groups like you mentioned but they failed in that attempt.
 
.
I think Pakistan can do that but the issue is that Pakistan is neither Israel nor Turkey.

True, Pakistan is neither Israel nor Turkey but that is a non sequitur.

A closer analogy is Pakistan's nuclear program -- Pakistanis ate grass when they felt something was critical to their existential interest.

Clearly building a barrier on the Afghan Pakistan border is much simpler and cheaper undertaking than Pakistan's nuclear program. And, if you note, an experiment has already been conducted by building a trench that is several hundred kilometers long.

So I think it is worth discussion if Pakistan does that -- what will be Afghanistan's outlook? Thoughts? [Game theory my dear]
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom