Bilal Khan (Quwa)
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2016
- Messages
- 7,004
- Reaction score
- 97
- Country
- Location
IMO ... try splitting the requirement.I think KS&EWs should join this program with Turkey other than these 4. It's far better than Chinese ones.
Go with China's CSOC for strategically valuable FFG. The CSOC 4,000-ton design can be adapted for carrying long-range SAM and LACM. The cost of APAR and OTHR will always be on the high-side, but you can balance that off with a potentially lower-cost hull built at CSOC. Capitalize on those savings by upping the subsystem selection.
However, to complement those you could build a larger fleet of lighter ships for front-line ASW, including the role of guarding the CSOC AAW frigate. The platform you select for this will have to be feasible from in operational costs, e.g. fuel, automation (reducing manpower needs) and reliability, and equipped with a top-end sub-sensor suite. While relatively costly upfront, the long-term savings (from operating costs) are key.
It seems the MILGEM was designed to be like that, all the more helpful with a low-RCS, low-acoustic and low-IR design. That said, one can still save somewhat with the MILGEM by taking control of the supply of sensors, CMS, ESM and weapon systems (e.g. AShM, SAM, ASW LWT, etc.). For example, each MBDA-Thales equipped Gowind 2500 costs around $250-275 m a ship. Assuming the MILGEM's hull costs around the same as the Gowind 2500, you can get some savings by swapping the French sensors and weapons with Turkish and South African equivalents.
Last edited: