What's new

Pakistan has Phenomenal Terrorists’ Killing Rate

Not gonna nit pick about which terrorist is more aggressive and all that bull.

I'd say killing hundreds of school kids is about desperate and low as a terrorist can get.

Just gonna give credit where it's due and say Pak army has smashed these Mf'ers good.
Idiot, out of all these groups ttp was the second most dangerous.
 
.
The Entire Philosophy Of Zarb e Azb Was:
You Hit Us We Are Going To Hit You Harder.This Happened When That Scumbag General Kiyani Was Replaced By A True Soldier General Raheel Who Took Over Reigns As COAS
.............

To defend a country you need an army, but to defend a nation you need education..
 
.
Idiot, out of all these groups ttp was the second most dangerous.

IDGAF - FFS You can check their certificates and credentials and make a league table to jack off to for all I care. B*tch.
 
. .
Actual performance during military offensives is better, most of our casualties listed are due to SBs and the Karachi Gang War and street crime.
 
.
That's because the militants that Iraq and Afghanistan are up against are incredibly more aggressive and desperate. Daesh for example has an intense sectarian hatred for both the state and people of Iraq-not to mention the huge injection of support that they had garnered from sympathizers-so much that they used performance drugs to frenzy themselves during combat. You don't hear of TTP doing anything like so.

This kind of aggressiveness isn't present in TTP since TTP is more of a revolutionary movement (you can just see it in the name). They don't want to destroy as much as they want to revise things.

I would say Iraq is more experienced today than Pakistan in this regard. The Iraqi golden battalions have really made a name for themselves as one of the most hardened troops living today.

Yeah with all due respect, you don't know what the F you are talking about.

Arm Chair bomb deffused, hotel used by UN aid workers (Saidu Sharif) SWAT.

arm_rest_ied.jpg



VBIED SWAT.PNG

VBIED recovered on Chaman Border

In these pictures you can see the results of AP rounds on a Punjab Police APC sent in to rescue pinned down officers following a raid Rahim yar Khan:
Image01-640x480.jpg

Image03-640x480.jpg

Image02-640x480.jpg

suicide-attack-by-taliban-on-apc-in-peshawar-14-mar-2014-a.jpg

Muhafiz APC targeted by EPF (Explosive Formed Projectile) also known as a Splatter Charge.

victim operated.PNG

Victim operated booby trap on an armored Land cruiser in KPK, notice the visible trip wire.

Victim2.PNG

Victim operated IED, this one was found under the vehicle of FC in Pishin.

Methai.PNG

Platter charge explosive of PETN/ANFO disguised as a methai box, this was similar to the tactics used by Taliban when attacking the ATS School in Islamabad in 2008.

P7170002.JPG

Complete suicide jacket hidden in a Madaris on outskirts of Islamabad.

P8062565.JPG

Diffusing and recover of x 3 suicide jackets from Melody in Islamabad.

Pakistan has Phenomenal Terrorists’ Killing Rate

November 12, 2018




Pakistan armed forces have achieved a remarkable success in war on terror – killing 3.7 terrorists for each casualty of its national and military police troop – a recent study by US-based Costs of War Project showed.

Extremists’ killing ratio by Pakistan is much taller than the quotient achieved by highly resourced NATO-led coalition in Afghanistan and Iraq – 0.7 and 0.8 – extensively supported by the US military and other allied troops.

The death toll in Afghanistan and Iraq excludes US military, US contractors, and other allied troops – which totaled 7,479 and 8,666 for October 2001 to October 2018 and March 2003 to October 2018 respectively.

It is very rare that the armed forces of an economically trailing country have unilaterally made such exceptional realizations on the battlefield, where multilateral US-led international military missions lagged.

As of FY 2018, the United States has spent an estimated of 1,523 billion in global wars on terror (GWOT), including 753 billion in Afghanistan and $770 billion in Iraq – according to a report by Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller).

On the contrary, the US has paid Pakistan only $9.9 billion during 16 years of war on terror. The other disbursements are on account of Coalition Support Fund (CSF) for military operations conducted by Pakistan on behalf of the United States.

Pakistan has also witnessed the occurrence of at least refugees (130,000), internally displaced people (170,000), and asylum seekers (8,000) as compared to higher proportions in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria.

In addition, the battle-hardened country has housed the largest of Afghan refugees – about half or 1.3 million, the report said.

Headed by Prof. Neta C. Crawford of Brown University’s Watson Institute, the paper further underscores that since 9/11, the United States’ wars on terror have directly killed 480,000 to 507,000 people in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan.

The death toll has increased by a shocking 110,000 to 137,000 deaths than the previous count of 370,000 by 35-membered groups of scholars, legal experts, human rights activists, and physicians.

A chair of Boston University’s Political Sciences Department additionally estimates that the direct deaths caused by war violence in Syria, ragged in 2011 and joined by the United States in 2014, have also killed more than 500,000 people.

Between October 2001 to October 2018, the US-GWOT have dined as many as 147,000 people in Afghanistan; 65,000 people in Pakistan; and 268,000 to 295,000 people in Iraq (March 2002 to October 2018).

Civilians in all the three countries were the prime victims of these endless wars on terror, whose deaths altogether accounted for more than 50% of the total death toll or 244,124 to 266,427 deaths.

Afghanistan – 147,000 Deaths

Between October 2001 and October 2008 – 58,696 Afghan military and policemen, 38,480 civilians, 42,100 opposition fighters, and 7,479 US military, US contactors, and other allied forces have lost their lives.

6 US DOD civilians, 63 journalists/media personnel, and 409 humanitarian workers have also been killed in the war-torn country during 15 years of war.

Pakistan – 65,000 Deaths

Since October 2001 – 8,832 Pakistani troops and civil armed forces, 23,372 civilians, and 32,490 militants have been killed in war on terror. Other deaths include US contractors (90), media (63), and humanitarian workers (95).

Iraq – 267,792 to 295,170 Deaths

Iraq, by far, is the largest victim of war on terror. Since March 2003, an estimated of 41,726 national military and police, 182,272 to 204,575 civilians, and 34,806 to 39,881 fighters of opposition factions have died.

The deaths attributable to US military (4,550), US contractors (3,793), US DOD civilians (15), and other allied troops (323) in Iraq are estimated at 8,681. A total of 245 people media men and 62 humanitarian works have also died so far.

The data compiled by the independent think tank distinctly illustrates that Pakistanarmed forces have played a crucial role in building forming a more secure and more peaceful world – bullying its economy, civilians, and military and policemen.

But unfortunately, the US-dominated international community is knowingly ignoring Pakistan’s contributions in war on terror – which will only jeopardize the global efforts to trounce the menace of terrorism.

The global community needs to understand that a peaceful and militarily and economically stronger Pakistan is in the interest of the sustainable and durable peace throughout the entire world.

And therefore should learn from Pakistan’s vital experiences in the war of terror, instead of unduly pressurizing it – which will only be helping the common mutual goal, to eradicate terrorism for much safer and securer world.

Proof is in the pudding. Don't need a third party to tell us this, been saying this since 2016:

stats yar.PNG
 
. .
not molvis. But people using good religious education for bad purposes. For example a good engineer could lso make bad things.
I agree that the softer aspects (ideology e.t.c were handled very well in Pakistan compared to Afghanistan and Iraq) but to say that we were more efficient in combating this menace or were more capable of handling such scenarios the best in the field turned out to be Iraq post 2014. At its worst Daesh controlled entire cities in Iraq and the rate at which the Iraqis reversed everything in an equally short amount of time is underappreciated. They know how to deal with such circumstances and they are better than Pakistan in this regard.
 
.
That's because the militants that Iraq and Afghanistan are up against are incredibly more aggressive and desperate. Daesh for example has an intense sectarian hatred for both the state and people of Iraq-not to mention the huge injection of support that they had garnered from sympathizers-so much that they used performance drugs to frenzy themselves during combat. You don't hear of TTP doing anything like so.

This kind of aggressiveness isn't present in TTP since TTP is more of a revolutionary movement (you can just see it in the name). They don't want to destroy as much as they want to revise things.

I would say Iraq is more experienced today than Pakistan in this regard. The Iraqi golden battalions have really made a name for themselves as one of the most hardened troops living today.

TTP and her sponsors also tried to exploit sectarian divide by bombing Shias schools, mosques and gatherings, the same technique used in Iraq by CIA/NATO.
 
. . . .
MashAllah Pakistan has done wonderfully job
But even this is really high Pakistan has almost 10000 Soldiers but what about who were injured and will be unable to continue the service

Pakistan has achieved alot but major losses happened in early start of this campaign against these scums
And normal units were replaced mostly by ssg until normal units were trained enough to operate against these scums

One Area Pakistan still continues to take damage is transport we all know well protected vehicles are expensive but Pakistan have decades of experience of gorilla warfare far better than other nations e.g Afghan war
They should have prepared better
your casualties will always be higher when you try to take our enemy which is dug in specially mountains and because of that region

Enemy attacked easy soft conveys with IEDS

As for loss it take millions to replace single soldier not just money , time as well
Even 1 against 100 is not acceptable i know in real world this is not possible but Pakistan should have pushed harder for UCAV , mraps
Air units should have been used much more frequently to soften enemy
Made a electronic buffer zone in AFG by use of uavs , awacs and scouts QRF forces with small attack heli unit in close proximity to daroud line
Pakistan should have done atleast on small level operations inside Afghanistan

It would have shown world Pakistan is not messing around shown the capabilities of Pakistani special forces even if covert operations are active some times you need overt operations to send message

But Good luck to these brave souls my prays with them
 
. . .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom