Pakistan has deployed its tactical weapon to counter Indian cold start doctrine

[django]

And secondly what is the benefits of the ranking when you are unable to compete or win in any major robotics/ Engineering competition . This simply shows the lack of quality of graduates the institute is producing.
The example is such India is number 2 in cricket ranking but loose champion trophy final to Pakistan.

Well said bro, very well said, they cannot do any original work, they cannot think out of the box to save their lives, they are mere book worms immune to creative thinking, must be something in the Ganga lol

 

[Reichsmarschall]

Like I said, I ignore brain farts like these.
You can argue when you make half the quality of education institute in Pakistan like IIT. Until then you can cry all about what we didn't get.
While Completely ignoring the fact that you didn't produce anything that contribute to science. Rather than a deserted scientist while we had four scientist who won Nobel price for their works. Theoretical Physics

where did you mentioned Abdul salam in this post?

 

[Hammad Arshad Qureshi]

Get your eyes checked. . Also, I have clearly mentioned he is not Indian anymore. He completed his grads/PG in India and then moved to US. Stop jumping up and down before reading trumpy troll.

@django what a delusional dude this person is. First he tries to praise his institute which is not as good as this gentlemen thinks it is. Then when given facts and figures about competitions he said it is imaginary. Then this gentlemen thought of giving example of indian living in USA to save face . Which we later found out that he had nothing to do with India. Now he is giving Bashan to Pakistani public that Pakistani people, Military and Establishment are somehow less educated or competent then Indians. Typical Bharti troll

 

[Chhatrapati]

where did you mentioned Abdul salam in this post?

Rather than a deserted scientist

 

[django]

@django what a delusional dude this person is. First he tries to praise his institute which is not as good as this gentlemen thinks it is. Then when given facts and figures about competitions he said it is imaginary. Then this gentlemen thought of giving example of indian living in USA to save face . Which we later found out that he had nothing to do with India. Now he is giving Bashan to Pakistani public that Pakistani people, Military and Establishment are somehow less educated or competent then Indians. Typical Bharti troll

He has clearly been fed a diet of FAKE Gangadeshi news, he really needs to give up on Arnab Goswami and come down to Earth and stop having delusions of competing with China, this southi chap needs to come back to reality or else he will end up in an Institiuion , no not a crappy IIT but a mental institution.Kudos

 

[Trango Towers]

That's a nice wet dream.
In the past you have tried it, and failed miserably. Not now, not ever.

was it a wet dream that we took pakistan from you?
was it a wet dream we took half of Kashmir from you?

but greater hind is a dead pind

 

[Basel]

MoD India has already said any use of tactical nuclear weapon against Indian army will be considered as a Nuclear war and considered a first strike.
Good luck

This is why TNWs are made and deployed to tell India that any war will lead to MAD.

 

[Gurjot.S]

Its means that without putting our men and material in unnecessary danger, we are looking to finish off the job quickly, efficiently and smartly.

and your enemy is not aware about your smartness ?

 

[Taimoor Khan]

and your enemy is not aware about your smartness ?

Taliban were aware of American invasion yet couldn't do anything about it. There is one thing to be aware, to do something about it in different matter all together.

We are not hidding our capabilities, every tom dick and Harry knows, if our enemy is not aware, good luck to them.

The development of Babur and RAAD is a clue as to how TNWs will be deployed. This will give a quick, efficient and robust machinism to dismantle enemy military and it's installation without harming it's population in cities.

Going back to your original "assumption" about our conventional might, I hope you don't have any self induced thoughts in mind anymore.

 

[Vortex]

Today, MOD Khaja Asif responsed to question about Indian aggression on LOC. He said Pakistan has already deployed tactical weapon to counter Indian cold start doctrine. On GEOTV interview with Hamid Mir.

MoD India has already said any use of tactical nuclear weapon against Indian army will be considered as a Nuclear war and considered a first strike.
Good luck

Post #1 : "tactical weapons"

Post #2 : "tactical nuclear weapon"


Question : what was really said by our famous MoD ?

 

[Hell Raiser]

Well said bro, very well said, they cannot do any original work, they cannot think out of the box to save their lives, they are mere book worms immune to creative thinking, must be something in the Ganga lol

umm.. Cow piss?

 

[HAIDER]

Post #1 : "tactical weapons"

Post #2 : "tactical nuclear weapon"


Question : what was really said by our famous MoD ?

Short range nuclear strike weapon...Nasr and Bubur is one of the examples.

 

[MilSpec]

First of all Sire Pakistan wasnt the one meddling in Afghanistan, it was the other way round with Afghanistan trying to meddle in Pakistan since our inception. You need to revisit History. They not only not recognize Pakistan as an independent country but also imposed war on us while we were still in our infancy.
47 was the right call and it has been debated extensively. The Maharajah would had acceded to India which he did anyway and against the wishes of the Kashmirs which is still the case today.
65 was a mistake no doubt but not because it happened but because it happened much latter where as it should had happened earlier during the Indo China war. Ayub screwed that over just because Uncle SAM asked him too and there is no denying that.
71 was an entire different scenario. It was more of a political one than military one. Bhutto and Mujeeb played a key part in this whole fiasco. India had already made up its mind for war. Insurgency was in full swing. Pakistan was left with no option.
None of this is related to the topic at hand. We dont live in the same era nor is the technology the same. Both countries are nuclear. India thinks it can win a nuclear exchange with Pakistan which i believe is utterly naive. If Pakistan uses tactical nukes on invading Indian armored columns inside Pakistan, India will have to make a very delicate choice over its response because A) It was India who was the aggressor here invading another country (Cold start) & B) Pakistan reserves the right to defend by any means necessary including using tactical nukes over its OWN TERRITORY. Having said that rest assured if things come down to that and Pakistan does use tactical nukes, it wont be without readying our long range ballistic missiles mated with nuclear war heads. Any missile launched from India in response will be considered as nuclear strike and Pakistan will immediately launch its own missiles towards India because there is hardly any window to wait and see resulting in MAD. The ball will be in India's court on the acceptable number of casualties, a few thousand versus hundreds of thousands.
No country will come out as a winner.

The way I see it, the whole mujhahideed, and then taliban, then csf and now again taliban support blew up in your face.
In 1947, you did not anticipate Indian Army pulling in - Thus another situational awareness failure.
In 65, your own military brass has multiple times indicted your military leadership of poor foresight. (let me know if you need references)
In 1971, the lead up to the war was your own doing, strategic planing is not just positioning your troops, it is conflict management fr long term scenarios.
In 1999, your own brass again on record says that is was an out come of 4 people planning Kargil.

I have no problems if you think that is the definition of good calculations. If so I wish you well.

Now coming to gist of what I said. If your defense policy remains reactionary to what India does or says, you wil always be a step behind. For every new doctrine India discusses if you have to some up battlefield solutions, it just makes you look foolish. Rather it would be prudent if you had a defense policy that would be able to contain every possible doctrine or battle formation that India or anyone can throw at you. My point was as simple as that.

 

[BetterPakistan]

Ok...if you say so.

Better bear it in your mind.

 

[IceCold]

The way I see it, the whole mujhahideed, and then taliban, then csf and now again taliban support blew up in your face.
In 1947, you did not anticipate Indian Army pulling in - Thus another situational awareness failure.
In 65, your own military brass has multiple times indicted your military leadership of poor foresight. (let me know if you need references)
In 1971, the lead up to the war was your own doing, strategic planing is not just positioning your troops, it is conflict management fr long term scenarios.
In 1999, your own brass again on record says that is was an out come of 4 people planning Kargil.

I have no problems if you think that is the definition of good calculations. If so I wish you well.

Now coming to gist of what I said. If your defense policy remains reactionary to what India does or says, you wil always be a step behind. For every new doctrine India discusses if you have to some up battlefield solutions, it just makes you look foolish. Rather it would be prudent if you had a defense policy that would be able to contain every possible doctrine or battle formation that India or anyone can throw at you. My point was as simple as that.

This is not the best of the argument you can come up with sir. I expected better. We did anticipate that Raja would accede to India anyway and he did. If we hadnt acted we wouldnt be able to liberate part of Kashmir that we did.
65 I already admitted Ayub's poor judgement because timing of that was absolutely pathetic.
71 Again it was a political failure and a setup. There was no land contact between the two parts and divided by a hostile territory, I dont know what are we arguing about??
Our defence policy remains reactionary because neither do we plan cold start nor do have an ambition or desire to teach India a lesson. On the contrary India has every bit of that and hence Newton's third law to every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.