What's new

Pakistan has 110 Nuclear weapons, edges ahead of India: USA Report

India doesnt't need more than 20 nukes anyway. If we have even 90 , that's more than enough for Pak.

10 on Punjab and 10 on Sindh and it's the end of the matter.

Balochistan will become independent. NWFP will rejoin Afghanistan.

Gilgit shias will also achieve their freedom and Azad kashmir too will become 'truly' Azad kashmir.

I hope it never comes down to this though.
 
.
India doesnt't need more than 20 nukes anyway. If we have even 90 , that's more than enough for Pak.

10 on Punjab and 10 on Sindh and it's the end of the matter.

Balochistan will become independent. NWFP will rejoin Afghanistan.

Gilgit shias will also achieve their freedom and Azad kashmir too will become 'truly' Azad kashmir.

I hope it never comes down to this though.

mate if you think India will live to see another day after a full fledged massive nuclear exchange then you don't know the meaning of "Mutual assured destruction" (MAD) it simply means there will be no Pakistan & India

India is 3.6 times the size of Pakistan so say for eg if it takes 20 warheads to annihilate Pakistan then multiply 20 by 3.6 20x 3.6 =72 so it will take 72 warheads to destroy India which mean neither India nor Pakistan will live too see another day
 
.
mate if you think India will live to see another day after a full fledged massive nuclear exchange then you don't know the meaning of "Mutual assured destruction" (MAD) it simply means there will be no Pakistan & India

India is 3.6 times the size of Pakistan so say for eg if it takes 20 warheads to annihilate Pakistan then multiply 20 by 3.6 20x 3.6 =72 so it will take 72 warheads to destroy India which mean neither India nor Pakistan will live too see another day

Don't disagree with this . That's why i say having 90 or 100 nukes means nothing in this context. For Pakistan 20 are enough as i explained and for India probably 80.So no point chest thumping on this.
 
.
You pakistanis NEED TO CALM DOWN about nuclear weapons.

I know for you people its a REALLY BIG EGO THING ... but nobody nukes nobody GET REAL

you never here the Americans. RUSSIANS, Israelis French the BRITS or the INDIANS go on abt NUKES and MAD they way you guys go on.

YOU CANT do nothing to NOBODY

YOUR WEAPONS are useless..

NO KASHMIR, NO SAICHEN NO KARGIL,

NO fdi NO new friends, no money , no economy.. ITS GOT PAKISTAN nothing of benefit to its CIITZENS

if your HONEST WITH YOURSELVES you where a more confident forward thinking COUNTRY BEFORE YOUR NUKES.

india was never going to invade anyway....
 
.
India doesnt't need more than 20 nukes anyway. If we have even 90 , that's more than enough for Pak.

10 on Punjab and 10 on Sindh and it's the end of the matter.

Balochistan will become independent. NWFP will rejoin Afghanistan.

Gilgit shias will also achieve their freedom and Azad kashmir too will become 'truly' Azad kashmir.

I hope it never comes down to this though.

Okay got your point. Means that Pakistan needs only two dozens of nukes for a complete catastrophe...and i really appreciate your last sentence...but what was the rest all about.... :astagh:
 
.
Pontoon is a pontoon...
Submarine is a submarine...
Do i need to say more?

You were the one making the bogus claim that

There is a very big difference between 'pontoon launched' and 'submarine launched'.

So now the only difference you could come up with is that they have a different name.
 
.
Will you please throw some light on your weapon delivery capability. And also discuss how your are ahead of India in nuclear weapon delivering capability.

Hmmmm! Where do I start?

From F-16s and Mirages to Ballistic missiles to Cruise missiles Pakistan has many options to deliver nuclear bomb to its enemies.


Nuclear Notebook: Pakistan's nuclear forces, 2011
BY HANS M. KRISTENSEN AND ROBERT S. NORRIS | 4 JULY 2011

The US raid that killed Osama bin Laden has raised concerns about the security of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal. In the process of building two new plutonium production reactors and a new reprocessing facility to fabricate more nuclear weapons fuel, Pakistan is also developing new delivery systems. The authors estimate that if the country's expansion continues, Pakistan's nuclear weapons stockpile could reach 150–200 warheads in a decade. They assess the country's nuclear forces, providing clear analysis of its nuclear command and control, nuclear-capable aircraft, ballistic missiles, and cruise missiles.

Despite its political instability, Pakistan continues to steadily expand its nuclear capabilities and competencies; in fact, it has the world's fastest-growing nuclear stockpile. In the aftermath of the US raid that killed Osama bin Laden, who had made his hideout in an Islamabad suburb, concerns about the security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons are likely to keep pace with the growth of Pakistan's arsenal. Pakistan is building two new plutonium production reactors and a new reprocessing facility with which it will be able to fabricate more nuclear weapons fuel. It is also developing new delivery systems. Enhancements to Pakistan's nuclear forces include a new nuclear-capable medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM), the development of two new nuclear-capable short-range ballistic missiles, and the development of two new nuclear-capable cruise missiles.

We estimate that Pakistan has a nuclear weapons stockpile of 90–110 nuclear warheads, an increase from the estimated 70–90 warheads in 2009 (Norris and Kristensen, 2009). The US Defense Intelligence Agency projected in 1999 that by 2020 Pakistan would have 60–80 warheads (Defense Intelligence Agency, 1999); Pakistan appears to have reached that level in 2006 or 2007 (Norris and Kristensen, 2007), more than a decade ahead of predictions. In January 2011, our estimate (DeYoung, 2011) of Pakistan's stockpile was confirmed in the New York Times by "officials and outsiders familiar with the American assessment," who said that the official US estimate for "deployed weapons" ranged from the mid-90s to more than 110 (Sanger and Schmitt, 2011). With four new delivery systems and two plutonium production reactors under development, however, the rate of Pakistan's stockpile growth may even increase over the next 10 years.

The Pakistani government has not defined the number and type of nuclear weapons that its minimum deterrent requires. But Pakistan's pace of nuclear modernization -- and its development of several short-range delivery systems -- indicates that its nuclear posture has entered an important new phase and that a public explanation is overdue.

Source:Remote Address: 125.237.92.23 • Server: It is 5 Minutes to Midnight | Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (70.32.112.105)

There are many foreign experts who like to write articles on Pakistan's nuclear weapons. Strangely they like you Indians are also fascinated by our weapons. I wonder why??????

:sniper:
 
.
Hmmmm! Where do I start?

From F-16s and Mirages to Ballistic missiles to Cruise missiles Pakistan has many options to deliver nuclear bomb to its enemies.


There are many foreign experts who like to write articles on Pakistan's nuclear weapons. Strangely they like you Indians are also fascinated by our weapons. I wonder why??????

:sniper:


because all those experts are indians use your brains
 
. .
You were the one making the bogus claim that



So now the only difference you could come up with is that they have a different name.

Baloon loser :lol:
Yur kids throw a right hissy fit for nothing...
I am still not sure where did i jump on your tail?
 
.
mate if you think India will live to see another day after a full fledged massive nuclear exchange then you don't know the meaning of "Mutual assured destruction" (MAD) it simply means there will be no Pakistan & India

India is 3.6 times the size of Pakistan so say for eg if it takes 20 warheads to annihilate Pakistan then multiply 20 by 3.6 20x 3.6 =72 so it will take 72 warheads to destroy India which mean neither India nor Pakistan will live too see another day

Which simply goes to show that Nukes are the "Ultimate Cyanide Pill" or Kamikaze Weapon. :D

So possession of Nukes is one thing, use of those Nukes is another. :P

Any Country will be able to use its Nukes only when its "going down forever" with little hope of survival !!!

Which is why its simply laughable when people here flaunt their Nuclear Armories just like that! :lol:
 
.
Which simply goes to show that Nukes are the "Ultimate Cyanide Pill" or Kamikaze Weapon. :D

So possession of Nukes is one thing, use of those Nukes is another. :P

Any Country will be able to use its Nukes only when its "going down forever" with little hope of survival !!!

Which is why its simply laughable when people here flaunt their Nuclear Armories just like that! :lol:
i know mate
its the ultimate mexican standoff imagine zardari ,mms & hu jintao in tarantino's reservoir dogs :lol:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
@Oscar, @Aeronaut @sancho @Safriz @fatman17 @muse

It seems apparent the reason for Pakistan being on the fastest nuke building spree compared to the other Nuclear Weapon States.


Pakistan Army is willing to sign the FMCT.

The only objection being raised against implementing FMCT is Pakistan. India is ready. Pakistan objects on account of one thing - Pakistan has the smallest number of fissile material to all the rest.

They would sign the treaty when PA achieves the number of warheads it thinks is will be future proof.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Baloon loser :lol:
Yur kids throw a right hissy fit for nothing...
I am still not sure where did i jump on your tail?

Everyone reading the thread knows who the looser is .
You made bogus claims which you cannot backup and the only thing you can do now is name calling.
Next time post only things you actually have any idea about , Junior Think Tank..........:lol:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
@Oscar, @Aeronaut @sancho @Safriz @fatman17 @muse

It seems apparent the reason for Pakistan being on the fastest nuke building spree compared to the other Nuclear Weapon States.


Pakistan Army is willing to sign the FMCT.

The only objection being raised against implementing FMCT is Pakistan. India is ready. Pakistan objects on account of one thing - Pakistan has the smallest number of fissile material to all the rest.

They would sign the treaty when PA achieves the number of warheads it thinks is will be future proof.

OK, help me out,your point is ____?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Back
Top Bottom