Pakistan's leaders should heed the lesson of Bangladesh
With flooding and social unrest, conditions are eerily similar to 40 years ago when East and West Pakistan went to war
Major General Yahya Khan, president of Pakistan in 1969, was slow to respond to the devastation wreaked by Cyclone Bhola. Photograph: Bettmann/Corbis
We have been here before: a natural event on a catastrophic scale that devastates communities in a remote part of the world, and the indifference of a national government more concerned with parochial political survival than its responsibility to help its own people.
As Pakistan lurches from one disaster to another and survivors of the floods continue to search for loved ones, lessons from a similar moment 40 years ago need to be heeded. In 1970, Cyclone Bhola roared up and battered the densely populated coastline of the then eastern wing of Pakistan. The ferocious tidal surge that accompanied it drowned many as they slept in this low lying region. The winds completely ripped away entire villages and their rice crops. Cholera, typhoid and other diseases followed. The number of dead is still unknown, but some estimates place it at anything up to 500,000. Close to 4 million people were directly affected, making it one of the 20th century's worst natural disasters. Its magnitude was so great that the BBC journalist Paul Reynolds, in trying to make sense of the east Asian tsunami of 2005, invoked Cyclone Bhola.
The Bay of Bengal is particularly prone to tropical cyclones. But what made Cyclone Bhola all the more terrible was firstly the Pakistani government's denial of the cyclone's magnitude and the havoc it had wreaked, and secondly the sheer lack of pathos shown towards the victims and survivors even after the scale of it was realised. Relief operations in the affected areas were unhurried, which meant many more needlessly died. The effects of the cyclone were soon to engulf Pakistan's already fraught political climate with anger directed at the government of General Yahya Khan who had at the time just returned from a state visit to China.
In the tumultuous year leading up to Cyclone Bhola, mass protests and unrest had become a staple of everyday life across East and West Pakistan. Pakistanis, fed up with military dictatorships, were demanding democracy. The military government headed by Ayub Khan was by then in its 12th year of power. However, what people received instead from their leaders was further dictatorship. The country's powerful feudal elites simply exchanged the unpopular Ayub for General Yahya Khan, then chief of the armed forces. His first act in office was to declare martial law. Strikes and rebellions against the state continued until Yahya was forced to concede Pakistan's first general elections to take place the following year in 1970. He was confident the bureaucracy would be able manipulate the results satisfactorily.
And then the waters came. East Pakistan suffered extensive flooding throughout the summer of 1970. The elections were postponed until December. In November Bhola hit. The entire political atmosphere changed dramatically. With the disregard shown by the Yahya government towards the victims of the cyclone, not only did East Pakistani politicians demand the leader's resignation, but people openly called for what had hitherto been left unsaid: the breakup of East and West Pakistan. It was now only a matter of when.
Many survivors were unable to vote in the elections because they had lost everything they owned. It became clear to Yahya and Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, West Pakistan's then most prominent politician and father-in-law of the current president Asif Ali Zardari, that what was inevitable was their ousting from power and the instalment of politicians from East Pakistan.
"East Pakistan is no problem," Bhutto reportedly replied to Yahya when asked for a solution. "We will have to kill some 20,000 people there and all will be well" And indeed after failing at the polls, that is precisely what was attempted in the nine month secessionist war between East Pakistani guerrillas and the West Pakistani army. In actuality, many more died than envisioned. East Pakistan managed to break away, renaming itself Bangladesh and Zulfikar was able to become the president of Pakistan as he had so desired.
Few would disagree that the mishandling of the cyclone relief operation precipitated the breakup of Pakistan in 1971, although secession was not solely due to the devastation of Cyclone Bhola. With the flooding, loss and suffering we are currently witnessing in the subcontinent, we must keep in mind that Pakistan is as volatile and precarious now as it was 40 years ago.
The remaining four states within the conglomeration Sindh, Baluchistan, Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (North-West Frontier Province) harbour longstanding and violent insurgency movements against the central government. Baluchis for example have been battling against the Pakistani army since they were forcibly incorporated into the state in 1947. Rather than ethnic diversity being at the root of this discontentment as some commentators suggest, it is the years of oppression, forced detentions, extra-judicial killings, exploitation and militarisation in these regions that is at the root of their resentment. This is no different to East Pakistan in 1970.
No region in Pakistan remains untouched by the flooding today. Coupled with a stagnating economy, mass unemployment, a bloody civil war against Islamist jihadis and the general hardships of every day life, as soon as the waters recede the question will return: will Pakistan break up again?
Pakistan's leaders should heed the lesson of Bangladesh | Delwar Hussain | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk
-----------------
Hoping the best for Pakistan in this time of hardship
![Jhanda :pakistan: :pakistan:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/cute/jhanda.gif)