What's new

Pakistan F-16 Discussions 2

We don't have money for F21 or this new F-16 block xyz.
You know what..., pigeons learn faster than you.
Note: And please guys, stick to the Topic about the F-16 & not shower with the:
- End the Romance of American Equipment
- We need to focus on JFT Block III & Project AZM.
I believe point #1 was meant for individuals like yourself. If you're NOT interested in a discussion, kindly visit the JF-17 sub-forum. Its full of Topics where your insight will be of great use.
 
.
I meant some like her. An individual who takes pictures for a profession & not passion.

The JF-17 could certainly use some quality pictures for promotional purpose during Air Shows.

You can see the lady from LM is actually coordinating with Pilots what they are supposed to do for the perfect angle.
Paf occasionally hires services of professional photographers as well.Cant post full picture but check the gear.

IMG-20190223-WA0008_20190526015337677.jpg


P.S I myself have done photography for the airforce (as a visitor) and one of my photos is painted on flight line of a certain squadron. :D
 
.
Paf occasionally hires services of professional photographers as well.Cant post full picture but check the gear.

View attachment 561941

P.S I myself have done photography for the airforce (as a visitor) and one of my photos is painted on flight line of a certain squadron. :D
...and i'll be covering the DxB Airshow later this Year - all 5 Days - Annual Leave APPROVED.
 
.
...and i'll be covering the DxB Airshow later this Year - all 5 Days - Annual Leave APPROVED.
Dxb is in my wishlist but I prefer spotting normal ops over airshows or aerobatics.
 
.
You know what..., pigeons learn faster than you.

I believe point #1 was meant for individuals like yourself. If you're NOT interested in a discussion, kindly visit the JF-17 sub-forum. Its full of Topics where your insight will be of great use.
Hahaha
 
. . . .
An eight year old story relevant to what's happening around to us now a days


Suspicious of stolen technology, U.S. suspends weapon exports to S.Korea
Posted on : Nov.21,2011 12:50 KST Modified on : Nov.21,2011 12:50 KST
  • print 프린트
  • Larger font size 글씨크기 크게
  • Smaller font size 글씨크기 작게
Analysts say the suspicions follow other claims of stolen technology
132184530641_20111122.JPG

132184530666_20111122.JPG

The “Tiger Eyes” sensor suite installed on the F-15K No. 3, is highlighted by the red circle, and visible in an airport hanger in Seoul. (Photo by Lee Jung-a)
By Lee Soon-hyuk 



Following the war of nerves between South Korea and the United States over the unauthorized dismantling of “Tiger Eyes,” a sensor suite installed on the F-15K, in August and September, the controversy over stealing defense industry technology has recently been spreading to other weapons. The Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) and others are officially playing down the importance of the issue, but there are signs the fallout may grow, with the United States suspending the export of strategic weaponry to South Korea.

Controversy over technology theft

U.S. suspicions that South Korea was stealing defense technology began with an incident involving the breaking of seals around the F-15K’s “Tiger Eyes” sensor suite. Installed under the fuselage of the F-15K, these sensors help to accurately bomb targets even at night and in poor weather.

In August, the United States sent an investigation team led by a deputy undersecretary of state to South Korea, where they pressed Air Force officials - then in the middle of the Ulchi Freedom Guardian exercise - about whether they had taken apart the Tiger Eyes without authorization. The Air Force responded that the seals on the Tiger Eyes had been damaged when they were installed on the aircraft. In September, a joint South Korea-U.S. investigation team was formed, but DAPA recently explained that the team’s investigation was unable to find signs that the part had been disassembled. According to a source, however, South Korea demanded the United States produce evidence that they had illicitly examined the device, but the U.S. did not, saying that to do so could reveal an informant. The source said that the United States was not convinced by South Korea’s explanation, and that both governments appear to have reached different conclusions.

Some analysts also claim that this is about more than just the Tiger Eyes, and that complaints from the U.S. government had been accumulating. A typical example is the ALQ-200, an external radar jammer manufactured by LIG Nex1. The Agency for Defense Development (ADD) has promoted the ALQ-200, which, when attached to the underside of an aircraft, detects radar waves coming from enemy missiles and scrambles them, as its own technology, but the United States suspects the technology was pirated. In particular, the U.S. was reportedly shocked when South Korea pushed to export the technology to Pakistan, where it might be installed on Chinese-made fighters, and plans to export the jammer were canceled.


Stopping strategic weapons exports to South Korea

After returning to the United States, the investigation team that had looked into the Tiger Eyes suspicions reported to the White House and Congress, resulting in the suspension of export of strategic weapons to South Korea. A typical example was Congress’s application of the brakes to the export of the Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle, which South Korea has been discussing adopting since the Roh Moo-hyun administration.

Local defense industries, for whom weapons development itself becomes difficult if key parts cannot be imported from the United States, also went into a state of emergency. Talk has spread within and outside of the military of one firm that sent high-ranking executives to the United States to beg in vain for the United States to allow it to export one of its products with U.S. technology.

In addition, the U.S. State Department’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) has reportedly decided recently to investigate suspicions of technology piracy in major weapon systems South Korea that has been promoting as developed using indigenous technology. Accordingly, the U.S. Embassy is currently investigating. The fire controls of the K1A1 tank, which, along with the ALQ-200, had previously been a matter of controversy, the MLRS system and the Cheong Sangeo and Hong Sangeo torpedoes are said to be major targets of the investigation.

D&D Focus Editor in Chief Kim Jong-dae, who first reported on the Tiger Eyes controversy in Defense 21, an online webzine on military matters run by the Hankyoreh, said the situation was brought on by a combination of the U.S. keynote of selling weapons to Korea but not transferring technology, and the DAPA’s and ADD’s lax and easy-going attitudes. He expressed concern about the after-effects, such as South Korea’s bargaining power dropping greatly during next year’s “F-X” project to adopt a next-generation fighter.

Meanwhile, regarding the U.S. government’s accurate grasp of the breaking of the Tiger Eyes seals, the existence of a U.S. informant has also become a matter of controversy. The Defense Security Command and NIS have reportedly begun trying to uncover the informant.

http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/506385.html
 
. . . .
will usa allow us to integrate turkish aesa radar & missiles on our f-16s
in near future
 
.
will usa allow us to integrate turkish aesa radar & missiles on our f-16s
in near future
According to our turkish friend @cabatli_53 pak does not need US permission for turkish upgrade for older blks they already passed contract restrictions age I think 35yrs if that is correct then look for aselsan AESA for our MLUs and new blk 52s probably Raytheon SABR AESA.
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom