What's new

Pakistan bans 'anti-Pakistani Army' film 'Children of War'

Status
Not open for further replies.
Niazi planned rape of Bangalee women for ethnic cleansing

Gen Niazi, left, and the cover of Khadim Hussain Raja's book “A stranger in my own country: East Pakistan 1969-1971”.
Star Report
In 1971, General AAK Niazi threatened that he would let loose his soldiers on the women of East Pakistan till the lineage or ethnicity of the Bangalees was changed, according to a new book.

Maj Gen (retd) Khadim Hussain Raja, who was general officer commanding of 14 Division in the then East Pakistan, gave the account in his book titled A Stranger in My Own Country: East Pakistan, 1969-1971, published by Oxford University Press this year.

The book is posthumously published probably because it was a hot potato in the times it was actually written, reports Pakistan based The Express Tribune on July 8.

Page 98 of the book reads, “[Enter] Commander East Pakistan General Niazi, wearing a pistol holster on his web belt. Niazi became abusive and started raving. Breaking into Urdu, he said: Main iss haramzadi qaum ki nasal badal doon ga. Yeh mujhe kiya samajhtey hain. He threatened that he would let his soldiers loose on their womenfolk. There was pin drop silence at these remarks. The next morning, we were given the sad news. A Bengali officer Major Mushtaq went into a bathroom at the Command Headquarters and shot himself in the head.”

General Tikka Khan disagreed with Raja that Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman be secretly dispatched to West Pakistan. He wanted to “publicly try Sheikh Mujib in Dhaka and hang him”, it also said.

The Express Tribune report opens with, “Pakistan's name has been blackened by just one man: General AAK 'Tiger' Niazi.”

It adds, "Niazi surrendered to Indian General JFR Jacob in 1971. Niazi handed over his personal pistol at the famous Race Course ceremony. Jacob examined the weapon: the lanyard was greasy and frayed, and the pistol was full of muck as if it hadn't been cleaned in a long while." (Surrender at Dacca: Birth of a Nation; by Lt Gen JFR Jacob; Manohar Publishers 1997).

General Ayub Khan, whose decade of rule caused the jurisprudence of separatism to evolve, gets the treatment he deserved through the testimony of another not-too-civilised general named Gul Hassan.

“Gul Hassan openly criticised Field Marshal Ayub Khan's sons who, according to him, were letting their father down by amassing wealth by unfair means. Gul Hassan blurted out that 'I have told the old cock that this time we will impose Martial Law and take control ourselves but not protect Ayub and his henchmen'. The reference [old cock] was to General Yahya Khan, commander-in-chief of the Pakistan Army” (Page 8).

The only leadership criterion was brutality riding on low IQ. The exception was General Yaqub Khan, the commander who insisted that General Yahya not postpone the session of the National Assembly elected after the 1970 election.

The author writes: “All of a sudden, General Yaqub Khan was bundled off as a student on the Imperial Defence College course. This clumsy and unceremonious action was obviously taken to get him out of the way” (Page 7).

Major General Rahim Khan was the other officer Pakistan can't be proud of: “Rahim started to criticise the senior commanders in Dhaka, especially me, although I happened to be a friend of his. He was of the opinion that the Bengalis were timid people and should have been subdued long ago. The reader can judge for himself the ignorance and lack of understanding of the East Pakistan situation among the hawks in the armed forces” (Page 97).

Rahim ran away from East Pakistan when things became too hot.

Niazi also asked Raja for phone numbers of his Bangalee girlfriends: “Abhi tau mujhey Bengali girlfriends kay phone number day do” (Page 99).

‘Genetic engineering’ in East Pakistan
By Khaled Ahmed

Pakistan’s name has been blackened by just one man: General AAK ‘Tiger’ Niazi. According to a new book by Oxford University Press, he is supposed to have pronounced the words that even Genghis Khan would have hesitated to use: that he would let loose his soldiers on the women of East Pakistan till the lineage/ethnicity of the Bengali race was changed.

The account has come from a true son of Pakistan, late Major-General (retd) Khadim Hussain Raja in his recently published book A Stranger in My Own Country: East Pakistan, 1969-1971 (OUP, 2012). The book is posthumously published probably because it was a hot potato in the times it was actually written. He was General Officer Commanding 14 Division in East Pakistan.

General Ayub Khan, whose decade of rule caused the jurisprudence of separatism to evolve, gets the treatment he deserved through the testimony of another not-too-civilised general named Gul Hassan:

“Gul Hassan openly criticised Field Marshal Ayub Khan’s sons who, according to him, were letting their father down by amassing wealth by unfair means. Gul Hassan blurted out that ‘I have told the old cock that this time we will impose Martial Law and take control ourselves but not protect Ayub and his henchmen’. The reference [old cock] was to General Yahya Khan, Commander-in-Chief of the Pakistan Army” (p.8).

General Yahya Khan, who took over from Ayub was not what the doctor would have ordered for East Pakistan. The only leadership criterion was brutality riding on low IQ. The exception was General Yaqub Khan, the commander who insisted that General Yahya not postpone the session of the National Assembly elected after the 1970 election.

The author writes: “All of a sudden, General Yaqub Khan was bundled off as a student on the Imperial Defence College course. This clumsy and unceremonious action was obviously taken to get him out of the way” (p.7).

Commander East Pakistan, General Tikka Khan, disagreed with Raja that Sheikh Mujibur Rahman be secretly despatched to West Pakistan. He wanted to “publicly try Sheikh Mujib in Dhaka and hang him” (p.93).

Major-General Rahim Khan was the other officer Pakistan can’t be proud of: “Rahim started to criticise the senior commanders in Dhaka, especially me, although I happened to be a friend of his. He was of the opinion that the Bengalis were timid people and should have been subdued long ago. The reader can judge for himself the ignorance and lack of understanding of the East Pakistan situation among the hawks in the armed forces” (p.97). Rahim ran away from East Pakistan when things became too hot.

We come to the climax: “[Enter] Commander East Pakistan General Niazi, wearing a pistol holster on his web belt. Niazi became abusive and started raving. Breaking into Urdu, he said: Main iss haramzadi qaum ki nasal badal doon ga. Yeh mujhe kiya samajhtey hain. He threatened that he would let his soldiers loose on their womenfolk. There was pin drop silence at these remarks. The next morning, we were given the sad news. A Bengali officer Major Mushtaq went into a bathroom at the Command Headquarters and shot himself in the head” (p.98).

Niazi also asked Raja for phone numbers of his Bengali girlfriends: “Abhi tau mujhey Bengali girlfriends kay phone number day do” (p.99). Niazi surrendered to Indian General JFR Jacob in 1971. ‘Tiger’ Niazi handed over his personal pistol at the famous Race Course ceremony. Jacob examined the weapon: the lanyard was greasy and frayed, and the pistol was full of muck as if it hadn’t been cleaned in a long while. (Surrender at Dacca: Birth of a Nation; by Lt. Gen JFR Jacob; Manohar Publishers 1997).

Published in The Express Tribune, July 8th, 2012.
 
UN have repeatdly demanded Israel to stop illegand displacement -
As I've pointed out here numerous times, these "what Israel is doing is illegal -" resolutions usually turn out to have as much legal force as the if the same U.N. body decided its favorite color. The General Assembly can't decide what's legal and what isn't, and the Security Council itself, while its security decisions under Chapter VII have force, cannot make a legal decision denoting partiality; furthermore, its determinations regarding Mandate Areas are subject to the terms of the Mandates themselves.

On the other hand, the ARABS violation of many international laws, Mandates, and U.N. Resolutions is easy to point out. For example, starting in the 1920s, in the lands under their political control, the Arabs forcibly evicted peaceful Jews and seized their property, in violation of the relevant Mandates. But you don't really care about that, right?

You see, while the ostensible target of the U.N.'s anti-Zionist "anger" is Israel, the real target is you: to mess up your heads. And they've succeeded, right?

Pakistanis are reared not in a liberal democracy but in a harsh form of majoritarianism: the crowd decides what's right, and laws usually serve to oppress minorities or the powerless. There's probably nothing scarier and more unthinkable to a lone Pakistani than standing up to a crowd and arguing that everything they believe in is backward.

Well, think about it. And act. And consider that people who accuse this Zionist of being deluded should remember that it isn't Israel whose own citizens go around blowing each other up and denouncing polio vaccinations a full generation after over half the citizenry decided they wanted to split.

...we exercise our right to...ban it from our theatres. Whats so wrong about that?
The Three Wise Monkeys is what's wrong with that.
 
Well, think about it. And act. And consider that people who accuse this Zionist of being deluded should remember that it isn't Israel whose own citizens go around blowing each other up and denouncing polio vaccinations a full generation after over half the citizenry decided they wanted to split.
No they just use Phosphorus bombs on innocent civilians, bulldoze their houses and deprive them of every basic human right under the sun!
 
No they just use Phosphorus bombs on innocent civilians, bulldoze their houses and deprive them of every basic human right under the sun!
As I've pointed out so many times, this is mixing up what things ARE for what they are CALLED. This is what has to be fought so Pakistanis can liberate themselves from fear and terror.

I have the feeling you've "rewound the tape" so you don't have to confront the idea that what you need to do to achieve the Pakistan you want is scary - and you're don't think that courage is there. Well, I've seen other Pakistanis like that, so you're not alone in that! Perhaps if you sought out like-minded fellows you'd all be able to step out and do something?
 
i heard some of the info are wrong
and the movies is made by India and so the movie will be like based whatever they like
 
People who take a one time abusive raving of Gen Niazi seriously need psychiatric help. Those who make movies about bogus conspiracies have an agenda. Good decision to ban this peice of crap.

Bangladeshi nationalists and Indians can make and watch any and all crap. Nothing will happen, nothing will change.

Sirjee the sole purpose of this movie is to depict Pakistanis as rapists isn't it ???

So why cry when we admit it ???

That may be so. But you should not stoop to that level. That post of yours was truly horrible.
 
As I've pointed out so many times, this is mixing up what things ARE for what they are CALLED. This is what has to be fought so Pakistanis can liberate themselves from fear and terror.

I have the feeling you've "rewound the tape" so you don't have to confront the idea that what you need to do to achieve the Pakistan you want is scary - and you're don't think that courage is there. Well, I've seen other Pakistanis like that, so you're not alone in that! Perhaps if you sought out like-minded fellows you'd all be able to step out and do something?
You can go blue in the face talking crap and spewing BS and lies, but you will never talk sense. We expect this from you!
 
Sirjee the sole purpose of this movie is to depict Pakistanis as rapists isn't it ???

So why cry when we admit it ???
We never did it, it was all Indian & Mukti Bahini propaganda. Had India not supported Mukti Bahini they would have been dead by now. Today they are called the awami league! Same fanatics!
 
There were only 33,000 soldiers in East Pakistan of the PA rest pow were non combatants mostly family member of troops, workers for the government etc.

So how did 33,000 soldiers kill 3 million while fighting an enemy army and a local rebellion at nearly 15 to 1 odds?

SUPA POWA ... 33,000 men raped 50000000000 women n killed 3 million ppl... fork they were so good tht they didnt even leave a single f.. proof... :lol:

Good catch buddy!

On a Baluch page one asswipe got busted.. but the poor bastard instead of gtfo started telling us that we are traitors etc... these people are obsessed..

As for the OP @Imbengali :lol:

That guy has some serious inferiority complexes... posts pics of his body n tells us how "Fair" he is and can easily be mistaken for being a Pakistani.. :rofl:
 
Last edited:
You can go blue in the face talking crap and spewing BS and lies, but you will never talk sense. We expect this from you!
Do you really want to end up like the Syrians who nursed their hate for generations and only after their society suffered 150,000 fatalities appealed to the Zionists to help defeat tyranny?

Truth is different from what you've learned and nursed your whole life.

I've seen some different ways Pakistanis accept this. Some withdraw. Some emigrate. Some become very selfish and use their knowledge and skills to cynically exploit and manipulate the ignorance of their fellow Pakistanis. At PDF there's only very few who realize that they have to dive in andbecome Zionists, because only in that way can they embrace the truth, logic, humanity, and justice necessary to build a successful civil society in Pakistan. Try establishing these without embracing Israel and the first time you're accused of being a Zionist you'll have to back-track on everything and it'll all break down because you failed to support he necessary hierarchy of values.

So what will it be for you, Abu Nasr? Acceptance, or continuing denial and a life of cloudy-mindedness?
 
Another defeat for basic civil rights in Pakistan
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom