What's new

Pakistan Army Didn't Surrender to Indian Army

And the greatest blessing India got was Pakistan is small. Can you imagine if Pakistan 6.6 times larger and equal to India in numnbers? We would have chewed your ugly faces and spat them into the Ganga ...

And Indian tolerance is the greatest boon that Pakistan as a nation had got. That's the reason why even after being able to dismember more than half of Pakistan in 1971 and becoming a nuclear power way back in 1974, knowing very well about the dare military and economic situation of Pakistan. India never choose to invade Pakistan or liberate GB and Pakistan occupied Kashmir. Yet a lot of hawks back home in Pakistan try and easily fool the general public successfully saying that an Indian invasion is imminent within 6 months. LOL :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Just watch the following as an example. :p:

 
And Indian tolerance
That is another name for weakness. It's semantics. Don't use weakness as a excuse to convert it into charity. It was the same Hindu weakness that saw the greatest pool of humanity being ruled for a thousand years by invaders from the West. I think you already know about your numbers. Even if you all spat you would have drowned any invader.

It was the same tolerance of invaders that you display to Pakistan or you should have squashed a tiny country like Pakistan the way a elephant tramples over a coconut. But that is you guys. Lack of gonads.

And you did not break up Pakistan in 1971. Geography, millions of Banglas created the cracks that you compounded. It was not Pak weakness that we lost. It was simple odds of geography, millions of Banglas, being thousand miles from home and facing 15:1 odds against IA. Even USA would have lost. They got thrashed by Vietcong just around the corner from Bangla.
 
KCi8K5G.png




 
The truth is, in the territory of Bangladesh, no surrender to the Indian Army took place. All the surrenders were to the Joint Command of the Indian and Bangladesh Forces in the Eastern Theatre.

Nowhere is the term “Indian Army” mentioned in this Instrument of Surrender.

That is all to say and prove what really happened. India claimed everything solely and that is the usual thing to do so with any ally.

Members: Sharing meme and pictures of 1971 needs to use their head and discuss the matter which actually saying something differently about the part of surrender either to Indian Army or to Combined Force. No one is discussing 71 won or lost. Still, if this is not enough to make few understand here, I wouldn't be reminding again.
 
Those who join Bangladeshi liberatiopn struggle leaving PAF utilizing very little help they got from India .

little help?
200,000 Indian soldiers were a little help


not only 15 to 1 superiority but Pakistani soldier had to watch their back from back stabing Bangali soldiers in their own ranks.
 
And even the greatest armies on earth will surrender against insurmountable odds. Here below. German General Staff surrender to the allies 1945.


h-GERMANY-SURRENDERS-ALLIES-WWII-ENDS-628x314.jpg


German_POW_Rohrwiller_45.jpg
 
That is another name for weakness. It's semantics. Don't use weakness as a excuse to convert it into charity. It was the same Hindu weakness that saw the greatest pool of humanity being ruled for a thousand years by invaders from the West. I think you already know about your numbers. Even if you all spat you would have drowned any invader.

LOL, I knew you would come up with this weakness crap. Never consider Tolerance to weakness. If someone bigger than you doesn't intend to hurt you, don't take it for weakness, rather his tolerance.

Moreover it was never the Hindu Raja's who allowed the foreigners to set foot on Indian soil. Rather the treachery by the likes of Mir Jafar's and Mir Sadiq's who not only betrayed their King, but also the people of the nation. If not for the success in the Battle of Plassey, the Britishers might have never set foot on Indian soil like they did back then. A classic example is the Battle of colachel, it was the turning point in the history of India, which threw away the Portuguese out of the Indian soil making them confined to only Goa, and few coastal Islands. The same might have been the fate of the British if the Nawab managed to win the battle, but again a Hindu commander Mir Madan Lal embraced martyrdom fighting for the King and country.

I think you already know about your numbers. Even if you all spat you would have drowned any invader.

LOL, don't try to distance yourself from your history. It was not you rather we and our ancestors who where ruled by foreigners for 100's of years. How hard you may try to paint it otherwise. :lol::lol::lol::lol:

It was the same tolerance of invaders that you display to Pakistan or you should have squashed a tiny country like Pakistan the way a elephant tramples over a coconut. But that is you guys. Lack of gonads.

Whatever you may think, but we never shied away from any war which was imposed by Pakistan on us, and on the contrary brought it to your own door steps that your forces had to end up defending your own cities. LOL :p:

And you did not break up Pakistan in 1971. Geography, millions of Banglas created the cracks that you compounded. It was not Pak weakness that we lost. It was simple odds of geography, millions of Banglas, being thousand miles from home and facing 15:1 odds against IA. Even USA would have lost. They got thrashed by Vietcong just around the corner from Bangla.

You are 100% true here. It was never Pakistan's weakness, rather stupidity that you lost half of your territory. But does that make any difference ??? At the end of the day who lost is what really matter, not how. :p:
 
At the end of the day who lost is what really matter, not how.
Yes, to the Banglas. You runts lost 1/3 of Kashmir despite having been given it by the Rajah. Come and try to cash the "Accession Instrument" that the Rajah bestowed on you in 1948. Come on then ...... ????


Wait. You need Banglas and a 15:1 advantage right ~ other than that Dalit United can't do anything.


KCi8K5G.png
 
Yes, to the Banglas. You runts lost 1/3 of Kashmir despite having been given it by the Rajah. Come and try to cash the "Accession Instrument" that the Rajah bestowed on you in 1948. Come on then ...... ????


Wait. You need Banglas and a 15:1 advantage right ~ other than that Dalit United can't do anything.


KCi8K5G.png

Self-comforting statements, huh ??

While you very well know the fact that it is again the Damn stupidity of Pakistan's that made the Raja to sign the Instrument of Accession, thereby giving India some level of legality for entering our forces into Kashmir, the result. You lost the Heart of Jammu and Kashmir state, Srinagar. Above all any control of any of the rivers flowing to your land. :p:

Yet it's India's tolerance that we agreed to sign a water treaty with you. Now you can very well call that leniency of ours as our weakness. LOL :lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
And the greatest blessing Pakistan continuous to enjoy, Indians are not cave dwelling 7th century barbarians and that despite being 7 times smaller, yet belligerent, Pakistan is allowed to exist.

Or in 1971 itself with one third of its army captured, one fourth of it airforce and half of its Navy destroyed, India did not capture west Pakistan too.
Even after India exploded its nuclear bomb in 1974, India did not wipe out Pakistan.
Either you are too ignorant or you are simply out to prove Justice Katju's figures.
Your own Sam Manekshaw is on record for disclosing the high losses suffered by the IAF to Indra Gandhi.
As for sparing the West, well seems the Indian propaganda machine has the ideal audience.
Did no one ever tell you how the Indian soldiers filled the grounds of POW camps in the West.

 
Either you are too ignorant or you are simply out to prove Justice Katju's figures.
Your own Sam Manekshaw is on record for disclosing the high losses suffered by the IAF to Indra Gandhi.
As for sparing the West, well seems the Indian propaganda machine has the ideal audience.
Did no one ever tell you how the Indian soldiers filled the grounds of POW camps in the West.


I find it hard to believe since, Sam Manekshaw was the field marshal of Indian army, firstly he has no business discussing IAF losses, hence would like to see some proof on that.

Secondly capturing 54 Indian soldiers must be really big deal for you, and out here we captured 93000 of you.

If 54 Indian POWs from 1971 war, filled the grounds of Pakistani POW camps, they must be pretty small camps or pretty huge prisoners, if there were more, will again need proof.
 
Wow. Some Pakistanis are still so bitter about 1971 that they not only downplay India's contribution to defeat of Pakistan military and the creation of Bangladesh, but reach back into ancient history to feel good about themselves. Hey, if it makes you feel about yourselves...
 
And Indian tolerance is the greatest boon that Pakistan as a nation had got. That's the reason why even after being able to dismember more than half of Pakistan in 1971 and becoming a nuclear power way back in 1974,
Just like how Jinnah carved 3 parts of india in 47 like a hot knife through butter. your nation got gutted into 3 by Jinnah.

dont ever forget that indian dont you ever forget that.

Is this the indian tolerance you talk about ? :omghaha::omghaha:
as long as the world keep getting these videos India can forget about the seat on the security council.
we made sure we shared that video with all our western friends on social networking sites so the world sees indias true face a Hindu terrorist country.
 
Last edited:
Secondly capturing 54 Indian soldiers must be really big deal for you, and out here we captured 93000 of you.
hahahahah :omghaha::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha: wasn't it 93 million pakistani officers.

lol the standard of education of these temple educated and feed indians is hilarious. man said 93k troops :yahoo::yahoo::yahoo:
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom