Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If true, its really impressive!Slightly off topic but worth sharing..
In a recent conversation, a GDP friend revealed that the jf-17 houses undisclosed EW package from a European country. The block 2 version had the f-16 blk 52 in trouble multiple times during BVR mock simulations. At the moment, thunder pilots are having an upper hand over the blk 52 jockeys in terms of A-A kills.
and this was the post you quoted:Apologies to bulldoze your area of influence but this kinda caught my attention.
So... you are sure about it like you salvaged Italian M 109s?
yup, have been hearing this for some 5 6 years now, some day, it is BOUND to happen
nope the first but apparently 6th JF-17 from the initial batch of 8 JF-17, previously we were aware about the overhaul of three JF-17 till March-17 in Pakistan
Only 3 are being overhauled there. Read the banner.
It's pac rather.
for blk-I https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/jf-1...ighter-thread-7.427560/page-369#post-10760322At what interval we need to overhaul it
yes 8 first came from China PAF as part of SBP PAC start its production in March-2009 and first JF-17 built in Pakistan was 09-111 with only 20% share of in-house manufacturingalso chances are these are 2007 models so 11 years not a bad
Its also likely that this is a pattern aircraft to put down procedures in tandem with CAC of doing a complete overhaul.
for blk-I https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/jf-1...ighter-thread-7.427560/page-369#post-10760322
yes 8 first came from China PAF as part of SBP PAC start its production in March-2009 and first JF-17 built in Pakistan was 09-111 with only 20% share of in-house manufacturing
View attachment 496344
09-111 was marked FC10011
Does this mean it is from the pre production series too?
View attachment 496821
for production run following table would be helpfulI always thought that only 8 SBP were FC1 0001 to FC1 0008 and then FC1 0101 onward for Block I?
With 09-112 being FC1 0104, you would expect 09-111 to be FC1 0103...
Or is this a painter's mistake