ACE OF THE AIR
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2014
- Messages
- 3,273
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
1) SuU-35 would give PAF some advancement in 5th gen technology along with a new engine which could potentially be used on Chinese platforms in the longer run if the Chinese engine is not up to the standard. It would also give JF-17 option to increase in size and higher payload not to mention similarity with other Russian aircraft operators would also be interested if it uses a similar engine.It is mostly a political statement. Yes PAF could theoretically go for Su-35, but I dont see PAF getting in bed with the French any time soon (British/German/Italian i.e. Typhoon is more likely than Rafale...though neither are very likely). They are selling Rafale to IAF so trying to go for it would be stupid AND PAF was already thoroughly pissed off when France refused to deal with them regarding avionics for the JF-17 and then when IAF deal looked like it was falling through, again tried to offer RC400. The PAF basically showed the french the middle finger and said the updated Chinese system (KLJ-7V2) was better than the French radar.
2) JF-17b is supposed to have a Snecma M88 engine which is powering the Rafale so one can be sure that it would be targeting those operators that are going to operate Rafales. PAF might also consider the Rafale as the French are interested to break even on the costs which still requires about 200-250 more aircraft sales to the !80 ordered by France.
3) EFT would be an ideal choice for PAF considering if PAF is interested in the TFX program. This is still to early to say what would happen in the long run. The BAe systems would love to sell the EFT to Pakistan so that the Indian's might have no issues as they have boasted the the SU-30MKI is far superior.
It is really very interesting what the decision would come out once it is finally made public.
SU-T50 PAK- FA(Fighter Aircraft for Air Force) can be out of PAF's reach because it is being funded by Indian Collaboration but there was news that there is an other project which is going to be called the PAK-MA (Military Aircraft) the vital difference was that these two would be designed for two different roles.The role that suites PAF the PAK-MA would be the correct choice. How ever there is no news regarding this aircraft at present so one can not say much about its development.IAF is neither smart nor they have closed any significant options for PAF. Not even Rafale. Only Tejas and T-50 (FGFA) are off limits due to IAF (thankfully). PAF is in much better position than it ever was in last two decades. It is the PAF which is the smart one here. PAF makes the best out of small budget and keeps balance with IAF. This is called being smart. Until IAF buys every single jet being produced in the world, options will remain available to Pakistan.
IAF strength declined while PAF sustained its numbers and grew in capability. PAF is far ahead from what it was at the turn of century. From zero BVR aircraft in 2000 we have now some 140 of them. Please do not bring up imaginary stuff like Tejas, Rafale and FGFA. When they are with you we will talk. OK? We have enough fire power at the moment to devastate IAF plans. Hangar Queens aka Su-30 won't cut it.
F-16 is more than a match for any aircraft which IAF has at the moment. JF-17 is good to take on most of them. There is no Rafale, no FGFA, not even Tejas in IAF. There might never be except Tejas. When any of it arrives in India we will have the answer as well. There is no shortage of fund if national security is at stake. At the moment there is none. Why waste funds then?
Iran and Malaysia have no capability to build an advanced jet. Turkey is making efforts and is most advanced in this area. They lack experience and are in learning stage, however. China is improving fast. Europeans won't transfer technology but will sell. US same but with political strings. Russia no problem again.
There is a video on you tube which describe what is a match for IAF.