Pak to bid for non-permanent UNSC seat next year

[Mirza Jatt]

vote for pakistan only if voting it does not become a hurdle for India in any diplomatic issue.otherwise there is no need to play a tit for tat just because pakistan played smart by voting India when India was already sure to win.

 

[Coltsfan]

arrey yaar UNSC is way over rated anyways.

without Veto power its useless....... much a do about nothing if you will

 

[notsuperstitious]

Snakes bite, scorpions sting

Dude, she's studied all this, Chukya and all

On topic, Pakistan supported because they knew India already had support of 186 out of 192 nations. If Pakistan had the decider vote, that would have been different.

If India knows Pakistan has adequate support, India should also support Pakistan.

 

[JamesBond]

I am a big fan of Chunkya diplomacy and Chunkya tactics. I have studied him in details.

You have studied him in detail yet you do not know the correct spelling of his name?

 

[Spring Onion]

Dude, she's studied all this, Chukya and all

On topic, Pakistan supported because they knew India already had support of 186 out of 192 nations. If Pakistan had the decider vote, that would have been different.

If India knows Pakistan has adequate support, India should also support Pakistan.

That does not matter if India already got enough votes.

What matters is we have compromised on our stand.

 

[third eye]

Its a good thing for Pak to seek a seat at the UNSC.

I wonder why Pak has to follow everything India does ? Surely this thought could have come earlier too unless considering the over whelming votes India got Pak was apprehensive to contest now.

We saw the same thing with the 123 deal. Power shortage was a prob in Pak (like India) even before the deal. As soon as the deal came thru, Pak clamored for the same.

No probs on both issues, Pak has an equal right to seek a place under the Sun, but the thought remains.. why only after India gets anything...

 

[Mirza Jatt]

Dude, she's studied all this, Chukya and all

On topic, Pakistan supported because they knew India already had support of 186 out of 192 nations. If Pakistan had the decider vote, that would have been different.

If India knows Pakistan has adequate support, India should also support Pakistan.

i would say vote for it even when it does not have adequate vote and india's vote is not the decider.

 

[Spring Onion]

You have studied him in detail yet you do not know the correct spelling of his name?

English does not have standard spellings for desi names.

 

[Coltsfan]

That does not matter if India already got enough votes.

What matters is we have compromised on our stand.

You mean the Pakistani stand of opposing India anywhere and everywhere?

 

[Spring Onion]

Its a good thing for Pak to seek a seat at the UNSC.

I wonder why Pak has to follow everything India does ? Surely this thought could have come earlier too unless considering the over whelming votes India got Pak was apprehensive to contest now.

We saw the same thing with the 123 deal. Power shortage was a prob in Pak (like India) even before the deal. As soon as the deal came thru, Pak clamored for the same.

No probs on both issues but the thought remains.. why only after India gets anything...

its not following India.

Please read the history of non-per UNSC members you may find Pakistan there already

 

[JamesBond]

English does not have standard spellings for desi names.

Fair enough but where did YOU read chanakya being pronounced as Chunkya...please lead me to a source.

 

[third eye]

its not following India.

Please read the history of non-per UNSC members you may find Pakistan there already

Yes Pak like India was a member earlier too, but the coincidence is striking.. only after India get anything Pak wants the same too !

 

[Spring Onion]

May be Indians consider this offensive as you mispell the name that is Chanakya and not Chunkya

ahhh i got it as you a slur for Commies and Chines and people in Manipur calling them Chunki so its offensive to Indians.


lolzz anyway either way you spell it, its the sound that matters

 

[JamesBond]

Yes Pak like India was a member earlier too, but the coincidence is striking.. only after India get anything Pak wants the same too !

And then they say they are different from India

 

[prototype]

That does not matter if India already got enough votes.

What matters is we have compromised on our stand.

Well that is the advantage of chunkya diplomacy,i thought u had studied in detail(except the name)

We force other's to compromise with this diplomacy,but ur leaders genuinely lack in this department