Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
^
Trollers slapping together penises.
Priceless.
You went there when we were not even present in Kashmir. You call it a victory?
Stalemate? lol you wanted to TAKE Kashmir, did you do that? Oh you didn't? well, that doesn't sound like victory to me. I'm not sure about Pakistani meaning of victory lol.
What is the result sir? We cut your country in 2 different pieces, it denied the so called 2 nation theory, and the Pakistan that your jinna made, don't even exist now.
I'm sorry for you people.
Lol. The same thing you did in '48. You went there when we were not present. Then you denied your involvement. Then you went to US. They ordered you to get out from India. You BACKED OFF. You call it victory?
Can you tell me what's the meaning of victory in Pakistani dictionary?
We were not present there either. Our British military commander refused to send Pakistani Troops into Kashmir. We had to act and use any force at our disposal before you would have gobbled up Kashmir like you did Hyderabad. The fact that a rag tag milita managed to capture 1/3 of Kashmir from an Army which just 3 years previous fought in World War II. Yeah, I call that a victory. Not a total victory but a victory nonetheless.
Our objective was to open the western front to pressurize pakistan in kashmir sector, we were sucessfull in doing so, in the end Over 1,840 km2 (710 mi2) of territory lost by Pak (primarily in Sialkot, Lahore, and Kashmir sectors) compared to 540 km2 (210 mi2) of territory won by pak (primarily in Rann of Kutch), Does that indicate successful 6-day war style blitz krieg that ayub khan had envisionedDid I say victory? Learn to read before responding. In the Korean War, US and UN Forces wanted to expel North Koreans from South Korea but then launched an attack into North Korea with the aim of conquering it. When they crossed the 38 parallel and then China attacked to throw the attackers out. When both sides could not dislodge each other, the war was considered a stalemate. Same thing applies here. Pakistan attacked and then you guys went beyond your objective and then attacked into Pakistan and Pakistan held you at bay which means it was a stalemate.
Kargil was a missed opportunity by India by all means, just like 65, india should have rolled down its armored corp down pakistan's throat for this misadventure, but this was BJP's coalition governments first term and the political establishment for the lack of better words were spineless.Our forces in Kargil were a mixture of Army soldiers and Kashmiri fighters. We just needed better logistics and we could have annexed Kargil. The fact that you guys had such a tough time and needed to deploy over 30,000 X 2 with logistics, just shows how tenacious the defenders of Kargil were.
Not since the Spartans held the Persians at bay Thermopayle did soldiers faced such great odds.
Ah good sir, solutions are only required if there are problems and the current structure of Pakistani politics is extremely comfortable for those in charge. Feudals and Generals alike would have the status quo continue for many more years.
While I understand your sentiment, do also think about the Pakistanis that have died due to these misadventures. For every Indian or Afghani or even American, far more Pakistanis have given their lives simply because someone in Islamabad decided he will make a name for himself. The cause of those in power is only strengthened when Pakistani soldiers die, because what no nation will do is to abandon its soldiers; the common public invariably falls behind the Generals and the whole ordeal turns into a self fulfilling prophecy. As I said before, a war just has to be started and everything falls into place.
If there is going to be a change, it would require either the elimination of external threats (unlikely) or continuous failure and exposure of the PA in protecting its citizen (painstakingly slow). In the end, the fear is: Pakistan may over play it's hand one too many times in global politics and give the USA or India the convenient excuse to take matters into their own hands. Guess who'll make up the bulk of the dead in that situation? As usual, the Pakistanis of course.
I say this not to undermine the loss of Indians, but to point out that we are all sufferers in this grand chess game that the Pakistani elite are playing and none are more desperate than Pakistanis, who seem to die for no cause at all. They don't even have the benefit of their government exacting revenge on those responsible as the Indians and Americans often promise; since those responsible for these crimes are the very people that lead them.
There were no british/ Indian troops in kashmir, once Indain army entered your spartans ran like nigerians in Olympic.
Our objective was to open the western front to pressurize pakistan in kashmir sector, we were sucessfull in doing so, in the end Over 1,840 km2 (710 mi2) of territory lost by Pak (primarily in Sialkot, Lahore, and Kashmir sectors) compared to 540 km2 (210 mi2) of territory won by pak (primarily in Rann of Kutch), Does that indicate successful 6-day war style blitz krieg that ayub khan had envisioned
Kargil was a missed opportunity by India by all means, just like 65, india should have rolled down its armored corp down pakistan's throat for this misadventure, but this was BJP's coalition governments first term and the political establishment for the lack of better words were spineless.
As far as bravery of pak spartans (mix of army and so called NLI) with active shelling from P.A armed with anti aircraft weaponry with a nuclear blackmail is concerned, I wonder why only twoo of them received Nishan-e-haidar?
Btw, remind me if the spartans at Thermopayle, retreat???
How did we run when we managed to hold 1/3 of Kashmir? Why couldn't India take all of Kashmir? We held our ground but India had Tanks and Fighters which greatly outnumbered and outgunned the Militias. But still we managed to hold 1/3 of Kashmir which is a great achievement.
No battleplan survives first contact. The fact that an outnumbered, outgunned and outmanned Pakistani Army fought the numerically superior Indians and held them at way when Indians decided to launch an attack into Pakistan shows that if both countries were on an even footing, India would have lost more badly than its defeat to China in 1962.
And just like in 1965, your generals would be dreaming of having Tea in Lahore.
We did not retreat, we withdrew our forces to a more strategic location. We held you guys at bay even though u guys threw everything at us.
Is it any wonder why India has lost so many wars.
1962 - total Indian defeat against China
1965 - an Army 3 times as big as Pakistan and yet could not defeat it
1987 - got badly mauled by LTTE and ran away like cowards
2002 - deployed troops at border but 700 died in accicdents
2008 - attack at mumbai and no response from India
There were no british/ Indian troops in kashmir, once Indain army entered your spartans ran like nigerians in Olympic.
Our objective was to open the western front to pressurize pakistan in kashmir sector, we were sucessfull in doing so, in the end Over 1,840 km2 (710 mi2) of territory lost by Pak (primarily in Sialkot, Lahore, and Kashmir sectors) compared to 540 km2 (210 mi2) of territory won by pak (primarily in Rann of Kutch), Does that indicate successful 6-day war style blitz krieg that ayub khan had envisioned
Kargil was a missed opportunity by India by all means, just like 65, india should have rolled down its armored corp down pakistan's throat for this misadventure, but this was BJP's coalition governments first term and the political establishment for the lack of better words were spineless.
As far as bravery of pak spartans (mix of army and so called NLI) with active shelling from P.A armed with anti aircraft weaponry with a nuclear blackmail is concerned, I wonder why only twoo of them received Nishan-e-haidar?
Btw, remind me if the spartans at Thermopayle, retreat???
Seems like you are fond of my baby cousin and his glasses. Even he could teach you how to use a "rifle".
Say hello to Kaka Jatt.
Funny Indian trollers these days.
5Is it any wonder why India has lost so many wars.
1962 - total Indian defeat against China
1965 - an Army 3 times as big as Pakistan and yet could not defeat it
1987 - got badly mauled by LTTE and ran away like cowards
2002 - deployed troops at border but 700 died in accicdents
2008 - attack at mumbai and no response from India
A kid holding a gun even he didn't belong any terrible area or any poor family or people who do this for living and don't you are preparing for Jihad, teach him do jihad for studies. But I think its make you happy, then stop sharing this
All Muslims Are Not Terrorist But Most Terrorists Are Muslim
A kid holding a gun even he didn't belong any terrible area or any poor family or people who do this for living and don't you are preparing for Jihad, teach him do jihad for studies. But I think its make you happy, then stop sharing this
All Muslims Are Not Terrorist But Most Terrorists Are Muslim