What's new

Pak Asif Admits Publically We have Sponsored Terror for 40 Years

Of course it matters, its the core of the conflict, we didn't want to live with Hindus, we didn't trust Hindus and we believed in the message of Jinnah, but you forced an entire state of Muslims into a Indian Union full of Hindus.

The conflict emanates from this, if Pakistan hadn't acted quickly azad Kashmir and GB would also be stuck

Indian occupied Kashmir is unfinished business
If you don't want to live with Hindus, what are you planning on doing to the 2 million Hindus who live in present day Pakistan?

You annexed Junagadh, Manvadar and Hyderabad Deccan claiming the people were Hindus so refrendum required, but your hypocrisy was exposed in IOK.

If Indians can think that Kashmiri fighting for freedom were terrorists then Pakistanis will start reciprocating by declaring your FF's as terrorists.

Siachin was occupied because india thought if it didn't take the area then Pakistan might. All based on if then scenerio.

Because Bangladesh was never supposed to be part of Pakistan, read 40's resolution. Even the name of Pakistan doesn't have any alphabet for "B' Bangladesh. Neither did Allama Iqbal's theory had Bangladesh as Pakistan. They along with Hyderabad Deccan were supposed to be separate countries from the start.

No - none of them were claimed because of Hindu population. Your hypocrisy and duplicity was exposed when you invaded a free nation - i.e. Kashmir after signing a Standstill Agreement with Kashmir. If you were not happy with the Indian Independence Act which granted Pakistan independence - you should not have agreed to the British plan. No one forced the Muslim League or Jinnah's hand.

Of course East Pakistan was meant to be in Pakistan - heck, it even had 55% of the Pakistani population. Didn't Suhrawardy propose that Calcutta serve both India and Pakistan as an "international city"? Whatever that means.


Iqbal was an Indian - he died before Pakistan was born. Hyderabad Deccan was an independent nation - and India honored the Standstill Agreement India signed with the Nizam - it was the Nizam's Razakars who broke it. Siachen was neither occupied nor demarcated. So what's the point you are trying to make?
 
. .
There are no Hindus up North
LOL - and what about the ones in the South? They aren't Pakistanis? What do you plan to do with them?

Look we know might is right, today politics dictate that india is right every where, but at least dont pretend to take moral high ground here

india is the only coutnry which has openly gone against UN resolutions, it has openly attacked a soverign country and call it war of freedom and even today openly admit insurgecy in another country

the difference between Kashmir and Baluchistan is that both india and Pakistan accept Kashmir as disputed territory and both accept Baluchistan as part of Pakistan, same is true for bengal, Sikkim, Goa and so on
From India's perspective, the only dispute in Kashmir is the land currently occupied by Pakistan. What are saying about Goa and Sikkim?
 
.
LOL - and what about the ones in the South? They aren't Pakistanis? What do you plan to do with them?


From India's perspective, the only dispute in Kashmir is the land currently occupied by Pakistan. What are saying about Goa and Sikkim?
kashmir will get independence when india becomes an educated country..if that happens...

i forget to add junagrah and Deccan
 
.
Pakistan is now so strong that we can publicly admit what we are doing in Kashmir and neither you nor any other country can do jack about it
 
.
read history and come back
well does matter, the only moral high ground is strength....
 
.
One day kashmir will be free its just matter of time now since raheel sharef is leading muslim miitary alliance. They will also come on this issue sooner or later.
If you bring a Muslim military alliance into the situation, the whole world will see it as a Muslim vs Everybody else conflict. The Muslim countries know this. That's why no one wants to interfere in Kashmir issue.

Kashmir is a muslim majority state, after the partition of the sub continent it wanted the simple freedom to be part of a muslim country

India with its greed ended the hope of peace in the sub continent by occupying a muslim majority state

We will support the quest of freedom for Kashmiri muslims from hindu occupation

India cannot complain about emnity from Pakistan, india cannot complain about the lack of peace or hatred, it wS indias greed that has caused this
At independence, the Muslim majority areas were supposed to go to Pakistan, but any region that was considered a princly state had the right to chose....he chose India.
 
.
No - none of them were claimed because of Hindu population. Your hypocrisy and duplicity was exposed when you invaded a free nation - i.e. Kashmir after signing a Standstill Agreement with Kashmir. If you were not happy with the Indian Independence Act which granted Pakistan independence - you should not have agreed to the British plan. No one forced the Muslim League or Jinnah's hand.

Of course East Pakistan was meant to be in Pakistan - heck, it even had 55% of the Pakistani population. Didn't Suhrawardy propose that Calcutta serve both India and Pakistan as an "international city"? Whatever that means.


Iqbal was an Indian - he died before Pakistan was born. Hyderabad Deccan was an independent nation - and India honored the Standstill Agreement India signed with the Nizam - it was the Nizam's Razakars who broke it. Siachen was neither occupied nor demarcated. So what's the point you are trying to make?

Pakistan have not invaded Kashmir, it was only when indian invader occupiers entered to help dogra terrorists. You were pushing back the tribals and Kashmiris from the liberated lands which is why Pakistan intervened to stop your invaders. You became world largest hypocrisy when you did something in Junagadh Manvadar and Hyderabad Deccan but did opposite in IOK.

Never it was supposed to be part of Pakistan. P unjab, A fghania (KPK, Wazitistan, FATA), K ashmir, S ind, balochis TAN. No Bangladesh exist in it. Go read 40's resolution.
836796620_549cf263d5.jpg


Hyderabad Deccan was invaded by India and a refrendum was held in which the population who was Hindu majority voted for India. Siachen was no man's land and India invaded and occupied it.

It was Allama Iqbal who dreamt about Pakistan. It was him who injected the new spiral power in Muslims of British India, Jinnah once was so devastated due to divided opinions of Muslims that he left India it was Iqbal who convinced him to come back and take charge of the movement. It was Iqbal who disagreed with Gandhi and Nehru and told them that a single state was the destiny for North West India's Muslims. Everyone knew after British departure, India would become an intolerant land of chaos so it was in the interests of even india to accept the reality of Pakistan.

This is what Allama Iqbal said,

“India is a continent of human groups belonging to different races, speaking different languages and professing different religions. Their behavior is not at all determined by a common race consciousness. I therefore, demand the formation of a consolidated Muslim state in the best interest of India and Islam.”

Now don't further start offtopic. You are continuously derailing the thread and next time I'm going to report it.

At independence, the Muslim majority areas were supposed to go to Pakistan, but any region that was considered a princly state had the right to chose....he chose India.

But Junagadh Manvadar Hyderabad Deccan were occupied by india claiming the population was Hindu.
 
.
India has KNOWN for 40 years YOU forment trouble IN KASHMIR

there IS NO UPRISING just terror groups

YOUR leaders call THEM proxys

You deny
You lie
Your claim victiims of terror
You say your support USA in Afghan War
Your support Talban
you SUPPORT haqaani

Your nation and its strategic goal is completely obessed with India & Kashmir

AND you cant match them militarily or through Economic power or Soft Power

YOU USE TERROR
Donkey of the day.

you sound like you were bullied on the council estate you grew up on.
 
.
Nothing surprising . Gen. Musaraf had already admitted it long ago .
These are only PDFians who are always in denial mode.
Who fkn denying? I wish that Pakistan Govt support any type of seperation movements in India and fund them and keep supporting Kashmiri Mujahideen and other freedom fighters. As you did and doing in Pakistan.
Now FU and do easy farts somewhere else.
 
. .
Pakistan is now so strong that we can publicly admit what we are doing in Kashmir and neither you nor any other country can do jack about it
Hey, hope you're well.

I don't know if this is the correct thread to ask, but I'll ask it anyway. As you might be aware, there are certain pre conditions for the UN resolution about Kashmir referendum. Why Pakistan isn't fulfilling it?

Wouldn't that be a logical thing to do considering that it's a requirement by the UN which calls it a disputed territory in the first place?

If Pakistan does follow the UN and vacates the part of Kashmir held by it, then there would be pressure on India to conduct a referendum on the whole of Kashmir (of course under UN supervision). Won't that solve the problem once and for all?
 
.
Hey, hope you're well.

I don't know if this is the correct thread to ask, but I'll ask it anyway. As you might be aware, there are certain pre conditions for the UN resolution about Kashmir referendum. Why Pakistan isn't fulfilling it?

Wouldn't that be a logical thing to do considering that it's a requirement by the UN which calls it a disputed territory in the first place?

If Pakistan does follow the UN and vacates the part of Kashmir held by it, then there would be pressure on India to conduct a referendum on the whole of Kashmir (of course under UN supervision). Won't that solve the problem once and for all?

has to be done by both parties at once and given control to UN, India does not agree to these preconditions
 
.
This is recent outcry of Nawaz league policy to bring Pakistan in main frame so army step back. I am waiting more from PMLN they never learned. This is exactily what happen when stablishment support one party more than any one els.
 
.
India has KNOWN for 40 years YOU forment trouble IN KASHMIR

there IS NO UPRISING just terror groups

YOUR leaders call THEM proxys

You deny
You lie
Your claim victiims of terror
You say your support USA in Afghan War
Your support Talban
you SUPPORT haqaani

Your nation and its strategic goal is completely obessed with India & Kashmir

AND you cant match them militarily or through Economic power or Soft Power

YOU USE TERROR


Actually you use terror... we support an indigenous armed struggle against oppression.

Big difference.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom