What's new

Pak army warns US against ‘unilateral action’ in Pakistan

INDIAPOSITIVE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
9,318
Reaction score
-28
Country
India
Location
India
ISLAMABAD: The military on Thursday warned the US against ‘unilateral action’, saying that despite its desire for cooperation on Afghanistan, there could be no compromise on national respect and sovereignty.

“The armed forces are working with friends and want to continue doing so, but there can be no compromise on our national honour. We do not want a conflict with our friends, but will ensure the security of Pakistan,” Military spokesperson Maj Gen Asif Ghafoor told a media briefing, recalling that the country was being threatened with “unilateral action” by the US.

The Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) chief spoke in both English and Urdu, in what appeared to be an effort to convey the institutional sentiment to an international audience.

• Ghafoor says unfounded American-Afghan narrative acquiring ‘threatening tone’ • Disputes Musharraf’s claim of ‘rogue faction’ within army • Saad Rafique, ISPR chief spar over former’s comments on army chief’s commitment to democracy

This is perhaps the strongest-ever reaction from Islamabad since US functionaries and statements recently began alluding to the possibility of unilateral action, amidst an ongoing row over alleged terrorist sanctuaries.

Earlier this month, CIA Director Mike Pompeo warned the US would do everything it could to ensure the elimination of “terrorist safe havens” in Pakistan.

Meanwhile, a Pentagon report on Afghanistan, released alongside Mr Pompeo’s statement, said the US could take “unilateral steps in areas of divergence”. The warnings were accentuated further when, during his trip to Afghanistan last week, Vice President Mike Pence said President Trump had put Pakistan on notice.

The military spokesman maintained that the nation would have to stand united in the face of possible unilateral action, saying such challenges could only be tackled through unity.

“Let it be known to all misadventure seekers and probably naïve thinkers that notwithstanding any temporary domestic differences, when it comes to security of our beloved Pakistan, we are all one,” he maintained. But he would not say how serious the threat was, even when asked directly.

Maj Gen Ghafoor said the “unfounded” US and Afghan narrative had lately acquired a “threatening” tone.

The spokesperson said the US claims were no longer valid after operations Zarb-i-Azb and Raddul Fasaad indiscriminately targeted terrorist of all shades. “We are confident that no terrorist organisation has an organized sanctuary in Pakistan”.

Rejecting the ‘do-more’ mantra, he said that after having fought “imposed and imported war(s) inside Pakistan” and having paid the price, there was a conviction that “we have done enough and we can’t do it any more for anyone”.

Nevertheless, he emphasised, Islamabad remained committed to assisting efforts for peace in Afghanistan due to its interest in seeing stability return to its war-ravaged neighbour.

He went on to list Pakistan’s expectations from the US: ending coercion, engagement based on trust and cooperation, repatriation of Afghan refugees from Pakistan, checking the Indian role in Afghanistan, and getting New Delhi to stop ceasefire violations along the Line of Control (LoC).

This year alone, India has committed 1,813 ceasefire violations, the most since the 2003 truce. These resulted in 52 civilian casualties, as per the statistics shared at the briefing.

Referring to recent Indian claims of cross-LoC actions, which have already been denied by ISPR, he said Pakistan is a “responsible state” with a “professional army” and would not be led into an escalation trap.

“You cannot lure us into unprofessional undertakings to reinforce your beaten narrative of our physical interference in [India-held] Kashmir. Brave young Kashmiris are good enough for you,” he underscored.

Saying that threats had not yet subsided, Maj Gen Ghafoor noted that the current situation was the “new normal” as far as peace and security in the country was concerned.

Responding to a query about former army chief and president retired Gen Pervez Muharraf’s claim that “rogue elements within the establishment” could be involved in Benazir Bhutto’s murder, the spokesperson said there was no rogue element in the Pakistan Army.

“Journalists should ask Gen Musharraf to clarify his comments,” he said.

War of words
He also termed as ‘irresponsible’ a recent statement by Khawaja Saad Rafique, where the railways minister had called on army men to support Army Chief Gen Qamar Bajwa’s pro-democracy stance.

Responding to a question, Maj Gen Ghafoor said: “The statement was extremely irresponsible and unwarranted as it targets the chain of command. The Pakistan Army is a disciplined institution and the army chief’s orders are followed without question”.

He expressed “concern” over the statement, saying: “The army takes pride in its institutional mechanisms. These remarks should not have been made,” also noting that Mr Rafique’s statement did not appear to be unintended.

The ISPR chief went as far as to suggest that the statement could constitute a violation of the Constitution, given the constitutional privilege and protection enjoyed by the army. He said that since the army was operating within the confines of the Constitution, it expected others to observe the same.

“If this line is followed, it would create lot of rifts,” he cautioned.

At a political gathering a few days ago, Mr Rafique had hailed Gen Qamar Bajwa’s appearance before the Senate, saying that the army chief had openly supported democracy and democratic norms, adding that the rank and file should also emulate him.

He went on to clarify that he was referring to those who regularly committed “petty mischief”.

“Such mischievous actions would not get us anywhere, it is better we end them,” he had said.

Later on Thursday night, Mr Rafique expressed shock over the ISPR chief’s reaction, but said he stood by his remarks and was insistent that he had not issued any “irresponsible statement”.

In a series of tweets, and subsequently on Shahzeb Khanzada’s show on Geo News, he claimed that parts of his speech were presented in a distorted manner by “certain news channels”, but admitting that his party was not always in agreement with establishment on policy issues.

“People are aware of my intentions and they are very clear; national institutions such as the judiciary, parliament and the army should not get confrontational. This will only benefit our enemies. We should move forward with harmony and understanding.”

He also questioned Gen Musharraf’s reference to the possible involvement of “some rogue establishment elements” in Benazir Bhutto’s murder, saying: “No one questions him or raises concern when he makes such big claims,” Mr Rafique lamented.


https://www.dawn.com/news/1379499
 
Last edited:
.
what will we do if US launches another abbotabad or salala type of attack other then protesting and blocking the supply route for few months? both these attacks were direct attacks at our military . their military is far superior then anything we can put to stop them.
 
. . .
Where was this pride when they invaded Abottabad ?
 
. .
Don't be so daft.

You are lucky that you do not have Afghanistan in your neighborhood.

We are not lucky due to our western side .
Warned ?
Honestly asks then what?
You are going to attack US
 
.
We are not lucky due to our western side .
Warned ?
Honestly asks then what?
You are going to attack US
Why would we attack US? What exactly is your point?

War on Terror spilled into Pakistan from Afghanistan unfortunately and American incursions occurred accordingly. Both Pakistan and US are on the same page when it comes to combating the menace of terrorism but US has an unfortunate habit of going overboard in its actions and we have informed them that this is not acceptable and they should behave.

Now, if India was in the position of Pakistan, it would have experienced similar violations vis-a-vis US. Be glad that you are not.
 
.
Why would we attack US? What exactly is your point?

War on Terror spilled into Pakistan from Afghanistan unfortunately and American incursions occurred accordingly. Both Pakistan and US are on the same page when it comes to combating the menace of terrorism but US has an unfortunate habit of going overboard in its actions and we have informed them that this is not acceptable and they should behave.

Now, if India was in the position of Pakistan, it would have experienced similar violations vis-a-vis US. Be glad that you are not.

US would think twice before attempts anything like that against India .
Once they transported some soldiers without informing India.Our AF forced them to land
 
.
US would think twice before attempts anything like that against India .
Once they transported some soldiers without informing India.Our AF forced them to land
Right.

Iraq has shot down American drones and harassed American Jets during the era of Saddam Hussein; didn't stop US from ruining it in the end.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1457672.stm
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/dec/23/iraq.marktran

Both Pakistan and India have regional-centric military capabilities in the end, and your chest-thumping is misplaced.

Again, be glad that Afghanistan is not your neighbor.
 
Last edited:
.
Right.

Iraq has shot down American drones and harassed American Jets during the era of Saddam Hussein; didn't stop US from ruining it in the end.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1457672.stm
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/dec/23/iraq.marktran

Both Pakistan and India have regional-centric military capabilities in the end, and your chest-thumping is misplaced.

Again, be glad that Afghanistan is not your neighbor.

Pakistan should not back down. It will show her weakness otherwise. I am not saying go to war but if US oversteps...Pakistan must respond otherwise credibility of our country in comity of nations will go down and people will be start thing as we are some kind of unstable/law less country...

About time, Pakistan shows aggression rather than being on receiving end like always. Enough of this Afghan shit.

If army don't respond, no one will respect them and creates disturbance in our country. US is trying to prepare ground time by time...First Salala then Abottabad then ???
 
.
USA had knitted a narrative when they violated Pakistani airspace to capture Osama, this time there is nothing which they could show to the world. What will they show this time? Dead American soldiers hanging from helicopters? That won't be fun.
 
.
Anti Islam world powers want some kind of adventure to happen. That's for sure. With a recession being predicted. US will have to provide it's jobless, disgruntled population with some kind of jobs or else they will rip Trump from white house. Voila. Start a war employ all the dudes who were let go.
 
.
Pakistan should not back down. It will show her weakness otherwise. I am not saying go to war but if US oversteps...Pakistan must respond otherwise credibility of our country in comity of nations will go down and people will be start thing as we are some kind of unstable/law less country...

About time, Pakistan shows aggression rather than being on receiving end like always. Enough of this Afghan shit.

If army don't respond, no one will respect them and creates disturbance in our country. US is trying to prepare ground time by time...First Salala then Abottabad then ???
Bro,

I see your point but we need to tread carefully.

Indians desire a full-blown confrontation between Pakistan and US because they know they cannot finish the job themselves. They know that Pakistan is a strong regional player and it would take a superpower to humble it.

Rest assure that Pakistan has conveyed US in clear terms that violation of its sovereignty is no longer an option. Now, even if Pakistani armed forces exercise caution in response to an incursion, US will be jeopardizing its collaboration with Pakistan with virtually any incursion. Policy of warnings are a good "pressure tactic."

Now, it is really easy for them to comment on Pakistani position vis-a-vis US because they are not in the shoes of Pakistan vis-a-vis Afghanistan. If India was in the same shoes, it would have experienced similar violations and pressure tactics from the US; they mistakenly assume otherwise.

US, being a superpower, can harass any country. It has imposed sanctions on Russia for its incursions in Ukraine and continue to harass Chinese in the SCS sector of the Pacific. In-fact, US has escalated its rhetoric against North Korea in current times and Chinese are panicking there as well.

If Russia and China cannot do much, what is India in comparison?

So let Indians bark. They know that their transgressions receive befitting response from Pakistan. So they look up to their new master in US to cower Pakistan.

We just need to weather the storm with our levelheadedness. Trump administration won't be in power forever.
 
Last edited:
.
Right.

Iraq has shot down American drones and harassed American Jets during the era of Saddam Hussein; didn't stop US from ruining it in the end.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1457672.stm
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/dec/23/iraq.marktran

Both Pakistan and India have regional-centric military capabilities in the end, and your chest-thumping is misplaced.

Again, be glad that Afghanistan is not your neighbor.
.I dont think so .
We Indians knows our strength ,capabilities and of course weakness.
They can inflict much damage to India than vice versa .But at the end what we now known as US will gone once and for all.
They also knows that .
US had tried some decades ago but didnt go very well at that time .Then India changed a lot .

Pakistan on the other hand face US power.

Of Course you can see dreams about the so called regional military stuff.

But here and in world everything is on another level

Bro,

I see your point but we need to tread carefully.

Indians desire a full-blown confrontation between Pakistan and US because they know they cannot finish the job themselves. They know that Pakistan is a strong regional player and it would take a superpower to humble it.

Rest assure that Pakistan has conveyed US in clear terms that violation of its sovereignty is no longer an option. Now, even if Pakistani armed forces exercise caution in response to an incursion, US will be jeopardizing its collaboration with Pakistan with virtually any incursion. Policy of warnings are a good "pressure tactic."

Now, it is really easy for them to comment on Pakistani position vis-a-vis US because they are not in the shoes of Pakistan vis-a-vis Afghanistan. If India was in the same shoes, it would have experienced similar violations and pressure tactics from the US; they mistakenly assume otherwise.

US, being a superpower, can harass any country. It has imposed sanctions on Russia for its incursions in Ukraine and continue to harass Chinese in the SCS sector of the Pacific. In-fact, US has escalated its rhetoric against North Korea in current times and Chinese are panicking there as well.

If Russia and China cannot do much, what is India in comparison?

So let Indians bark. They know that their transgressions receive befitting response from Pakistan. So they look up to their new master in US to cower Pakistan.

We just need to weather the storm with our levelheadedness. Trump administration won't be in power forever.

Nope ,we can do much more than those two nations .
Not because of hard power,but soft power .
There is always a reason for hectic effort from Arab world,Iran ,Israel and all other countries for relation with India .

And in case of hard power we knows we are not bad .

Pakistans only advantage is it is next neighbour status .
Mexico can also create problems to US if they want .
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom