You should go to some institute at least the standard of Royal Military Academy or exceeding and help them in Military History subject. I'll not reply to you further whatever you say and I hope no other member should either.
First coming to PLAAF and it may annoy Chinese members a little. China had a third rate military by any standards except numerical superiority untill recent years. And they relied on numerical superiority even more than Russians in their early days when sent hundreds and thousands of soldiers in the line of fire to overwhelm enemy using numbers and sadly, lost more than enough. In WW2 they hired U.S pilots to fight on their side, known as 'Flying Tigers'. After 48 and during Korean war, they were not well-trained and Russians didn't train them well and Koreans as a whole. As a North Korean pilot who defected after war with his MiG-15(I don't remember his name right now) told, that they were just taught basic controls and nothing about dogfighting or aerial combat. During Korean War, they got either shot down over MiG-Alley or if they got chance, dumped all their ammo and made a run across Yalu river to their home bases. Should we also talk about the days when a PLAAF MiG-15 landed with an un-exploded Sidewinder stuck in his machine fired from a Taiwanese Sabre? 62 with India can't be said a triumph if you talk exclusively about PLAAF. After the Sino-Soviet split, who else were they training with? And so advanced was the PLAAF during Vietnam War that, When Russia shipped MiGs to Vietnam through China, Chinese took out original avionics and put domestic ones in them. 90s is when PLAAF really and Chinese forces realized many fact about equipment and training and moved toward the right direction. And now, one can see they have started to show their abilities.
PAF on the other hand, is a different stories. When it got settled, it had good equipment and comparable training. Other vital fact is that the leadership was far-seeing and training has been the core of PAF ever since. Though it saw down-times too but over-all it emerges superior to many competitors if you take in consideration the harsh realities which the service and country have faced. Another good thing about PAF's training is, its diversity. Our pilots are flying many types in many countries including China, Middle East and at the doors of Europe while PLAAF lacks that kind of perks considering how much can you learn from different experiences and equipment. And results speak, with PAF being the sole shooter of zionist jets without any loss and Russians too, if you think they were something.
And btw, what if I say you that Paf had detected the U.S aircraft, can you tell me who would have made the decision to shoot 'em down?
