When the IAF crosses the border or gets close.
Every Time. In order for the IAF to achieve its stated tactical and strategic goals, they need to punch through PAF's Defences on the Border and Engage in Knife Fights. Anything less than that, and we are just pretending to play war.
You're clearly getting confused here my friend. Both sides have comprehensive Radar Coverage over each other. With the introduction of AWACS, both sides can now even spot blow flying fast movers or attack helicopters. Thus, there will not be a surprise from either side.
Exactly, and the interceptors will engage them as they see fit. Your entire premise relies on the fact, that PAF will fight the IAF under their rules.
Again, you're looking at the entire spectrum through Black and White. That's just fan fiction nothing else, Modern Warfare is not fought like this. Whatever Strike Package the IAF sends, PAF has the necessary SOP's and the interceptors to deal with it. Fifth Generation Jets is certainly not the answer, not by a long shot. Again, you're looking at things black and white. First, the rest of the world is still decades away before they can field a sophisticated Aircraft like the F22. Second, whether its China or Russia hasn't even come close to replicating the RCS reduction capabilities that we have seen on the F22. Third, there are Radar Developemnts that are happening Parallel and how long before Radars are developed that have the ability to spot Aircrafts with minimal RCS. Unfortunately, your entire premise is based on Black and White Theories.
This is not a movie my friend. In order for the IAF to punch through the border, they have to engage in WVR Knife Fights. If not, than we are just pretending to play war. They can take BVR Shots from far away, and we can do the same. The farther the missile is fired from, the lower its kill ratio. E.g If the MKI fires a BVR shot from 70 km away, the PAF Interceptor can just turn and escape its maximum range.
We don't need to send in Fighters for Deep Strike Missions, this is not the 90's. This is exactly why PAF has invested heavy resources into developing Stand Off Weapons. Why send an Aircraft to carry out a Deep Strike, when the Cruise Missile or a Long Range Gliding Bomb can do the same.
I am well aware of IAF's EW Capabilities, they are simply top notch. But they are not even close to being Superior Enough to overwhelm PAF's Capabilities. I suggest you go back a few years, and we debated extensively in regards to PAF's EW Capabilities.
That is not true my friend.
AIM-120C
SD10-A
PL9-III
etc all have Off Bore Sight Capability
What PAF lacks is a 5th Generation WVRAAM such as the AIM-9X but PAF has been operating 4th Generation WVRAAM for quite some time. Here's a little homework for you, F7PG's were firing 4th Generation WVRAAM's cued up with their HMD's in High Mark Exercise 2010. Find out what Missile that was.