What's new

PAF’s disasters, incompetence and achievements

mundaus

BANNED

New Recruit

Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Sqn Ldr (Retd) SHUAIB ALAM KHAN

This is a partial posting of the article. Please refer to the links at the bottom for complete article.

On the opening day of the '71 war, I had just returned from Jaisalmir, on entering the crew-room, I saw Gp.Capt. Rashid Rehman and Captain Bhombul the Director Naval Operations. They said that they had sighted an Indian convoy at about 1800 hours from a PIA Fokker, consisting of two merchant men escorted by six warships. Their position was 150 nautical miles south of Karachi, steaming south-east at about 15 knots. The OC Wing joined us and we found that 7 serviceable B57s were available and after modification of the weapons load to include parachute flares and rockets we could strike this convoy several times before dawn and before it could gain the security of friendly air cover. With this information plotted on a chart we moved to the base ops-room and briefed the Base Commander recommending that we attack the convoy or set up a standing patrol of a single B57 about 70/80 nautical miles from Karachi, outside Indian radar/fighter air cover and wait for the Indian Navy. The Base Commander spoke to the Air Chief who said 'LET THE NAVY FIGHT ITS OWN BATTLES!

The Navy got the message despite all our excuses. There were no more missions that night. The Indians bombed us by the hour and we got a taste of our own medicine. In the early morning we had a completely different type of attack-missiles,- the missiles struck without warning, no air raid alert, suddenly the dawn sky was filled with light and Karachi oil terminal started burning, punctuated with its own explosions. It seems that the Indian convoy reversed course and returned towards Karachi, launched its full complement of 'Osa boats. These boats were capable of speeds of 35/45 knots and armed with missiles with a range of 25/30 miles. Osa boats returned to Karachi again, they sank two naval vessels, two merchant men, captured a merchant vessel from our coastal waters, damaged PNS Dacca and the oil terminal. The Pak Fleet returned to harbor, off loaded its heavy ammunition and remained docked for port air defense for the rest of the war.

The Army deployed 18 Division in the Sukkur - Rahim Yar Khan area and the Air Force was to provide air support from Jacobabad. This forward base was equipped to house and maintain 6, F86s. The Army launched the operation, caught the enemy completely by surprise only to be beaten back by 4 IAF Hunter aircraft based at Jaisalmir. Jacobabad was activated after the cease-fire!

On 16th December a tank battle developed in the Zafarwal area, where an Indian armored brigade consisting of four tank regiments broke the protective cordon of our minefield and massed to attack. When air support was requested, support was not provided, could the answer have been: 'LET THE ARMY FIGHT ITS OWN BATTLES?

The battle raged all day, 13th Lancers and 31st Cavalry lost most of their tanks, the enemy was held despite the Air Force. Over a 100 serviceable F86s, F6s, B57s or Mirages were available at Murid, Peshawar, Mianwali, Shorkot, Faisalabad and Sargodha but remained grounded.

The Air Force provided air support to the Navy at Karachi, on a report from a PIA aircraft flying reconnaissance for the Navy, the morning CAP (combat air patrol) at Masroor was asked to investigate, the result was that PNS Zulfiqar took 900 hits of point 5 inch ammo killing several officers and men, with many more injured.

The ship was at anchor, it was not going anywhere! Had the pilots not been so trigger happy, the ships identity could have been established with just two radio calls, and had the pilots had been trained in ship recognition they would have reported back that it was the PNS Zulfiqar!

The operating statistics for 1971 war are as under:
Sorties %Effort
Air Defence 1748 58%
Army / Navy support 951 32%
Day Strike 160 5%
Night Strike 130 4%
Photo / Recce 38 1%

Between the '65 and 71 wars some Army/Air Force co-operation took place, but the Navy was left high and dry. The Navy had no defence against the Osa boat. The Egyptian Navy using the Osa had sunk an Israeli destroyer. The PN approached the Air Force, but no solution was suggested nor were any joint plans agreed upon. The Air Force phased out its only Long Range Maritime Search and Rescue aircraft the SA16! The Osa defence plan is quite simple, identify the convoy or boats and zap them with fighters in the day or bombers by night. The B57 crews had been extensively trained in night operations. The use of parachute flares, night gunnery, rocket attack or skip bombing had all been practiced. The Osa had little or no air defence capability. As far as finding and recognition of the Osa is concerned the C130 was available for long range maritime patrol, its navigation radar was adequate and with an endurance of 10 to 12 hours at patrol altitude, the lack of specialist maritime recce aircraft would not be felt. Our highly sophisticated Electronic Intelligence B57 was also an available asset at PAF Masroor, it should have scanned the Arabian Sea daily, starting well before the war, finger printing all Indian naval ship and shore radars! This aircraft did not get airborne throughout the war and was lost due to enemy night bombing! However, Naval support required will, training, co-ordination and the earnest desire to help and not fight over the budget! Even on the night of the 3rd, the Director Naval Operations had sighted the Indian convoy from a PIA Fokker, all that was needed was that the B57s mop them up. Air effort was available. The Air Force / Navy co-operation that had resulted in the shooting up of an anchored Naval vessel borders on criminal negligence. The Indian version of the Osa attack is: '.. The main attack on Karachi harbor would be launched by tiny PT-15 missile boats-. without air cover -these boats were designed for coastal defense and not for long range offensive action-.The Indian Navy accomplished the task assigned to it within a few days of the war. No enemy shipping could move in or out of its harbors. Control of the sea around both wings of Pakistan was with the Indian Navy.

The Air Force blames the Army for not informing them or giving sufficient notice of its operations in the desert and on this basis denied support to 18 Division. What alternatives did the PAF have even if Jacobabad was not activated? There were 8 B57 at Masroor and perhaps 9 at Mianwali, Jaisalmir was within range of both B57 bases. Instead of going anywhere else the B57s should have been concentrated only on Jaisalmir. Starting with a 4 B57 dusk strike, continuing with half hourly raids through the night and following up with a 4 ship B57 dawn strike. Some 20 or 30 B57 missions could have been flown daily, until the Hunter force had been destroyed. The F104s were sent to Utarlai, Jamnagar and even ordered to Jodhpur, but if its attacks were concentrated against Jaisalmir, this would result in significant help to the Army. The Indian version: 'The Battle for Longewal, fought in the deserts of the Indian state of Rajastan, merits inclusion in any account of the 1971 India-Pakistan war because of the sheer audacity of the Pakistani generals who had planned it. Had it succeeded, India would have lost thousands of kilometers of a vast expanse of desert. But there is a fine line between the daring and the foolhardy. Did Pakistani general cross that dividing line?
Air support was not provided in the Zafarwal sector, this defies explanation, was the C-in-C PAF drunk?

The only place where the PAF acquitted itself well was in East Pakistan, both in '65 and in '71. In '65, it struck Kalikunda twice, Bhagdogra, Hasimara and Agartala. In 71 the Dacca air base, handicapped by not having a wireless observer unit or a main radar (evacuated to West Pakistan) gave an excellent account for itself. It lost only four aircraft in air combat, including the present Chief of Air Staff who became a prisoner of war. The IAF was severely punished in its day attacks and despite, the Indian preponderance of 10 or 20 to 1, they stopped day raids and concentrated their air effort to night high altitude bombing. No aircraft was damaged by these attacks, 12 or 13 aircraft remained when runway repair was given up and the pilots were evacuated, according to plan.

It will be pertinent to note that India operates Pathankot and Amritsar, both within gun range from Pakistan! Other facts are that only four senior officers took part in operations in '65, Nur Khan, Hall, Zahid Butt and Khaqan Abassi, of these pilots only Nur Khan was from fighter command. In 1971, no senior officer Group Captain or above got airborne.

For complete article, please refer to the following links:

The Fighter Gap - 1

The Fighter Gap 2
 
Last edited:
The Base Commander spoke to the Air Chief who said 'LET THE NAVY FIGHT ITS OWN BATTLES!



Hi,


My question to the fly boys is that none of them had the balls to execute the ACM---put him in front of the firing squad----charged with high treason---and dead body hung by the telephone outside the base---to set up an example.

No other air marshall or air commodore had the courage and the cojones to charge that man with treason---and force a barratry ( mutiny by officers ). I have always wondered about that---or were they all a bunch of people made from the same mould.
 
Sqn Ldr Shoaib actively participated in 65 and 71 and his views can't be discounted. His account seems to be sincere effort.

Mastan I agree with you idea. When the honour of nation is at stake, a commander does not matter. I have always been against the YES SIR mentality.

I wonder how Sqn Ldr Dilawar Hussain in Dec 1971 at Dhaka accepted the order of his commander (Air Commodore Inam Ul Hak) and aborted the take off a few moments before the attack of a heavy Indian AF formation. He could have neglected that treacherous order and could have continued with intercepting the indian formation alongwith giving a call to his fellow pilots for joining him in.

Having a hint of the commander's plan, No.14 Squadron officers could have also staged a revolt and nominated another senior as commander for the war duration.

Shoaib Alam also confirms the removal of the main radar from Dhaka and its shifting to West Pakistan. 1971 was not a war, it was a game or a drama in which junior officers and staff were made scapegoats.
 
Last edited:
Shoaib Alam also confirms the removal of the main radar from Dhaka and its shifting to West Pakistan. 1971 was not a war, it was a game or a drama in which junior officers and staff were made scapegoats.

I agree with you 100 % on this Part.
 
I wonder how Sqn Ldr Dilawar Hussain in Dec 1971 at Dhaka accepted the order of his commander (Air Commodore Inam Ul Hak) and aborted the take off a few moments before the attack of a heavy Indian AF formation. .

while it may be furstrating to the pilot - one has to look at the commanders point of view. air commodore may have seen that the formation was too huge for one or two sabres to make a difference. maybe he did not want to lose a good man to a lost cause.

also which day did it happen? i am assuming it was on the day the migs bombed the runway?
 
Shoaib Alam also confirms the removal of the main radar from Dhaka and its shifting to West Pakistan. 1971 was not a war, it was a game or a drama in which junior officers and staff were made scapegoats.

talk about self goal. this is like the indain officer who did not allow Gnats to take off during pathankot attack in 65
 
while it may be furstrating to the pilot - one has to look at the commanders point of view. air commodore may have seen that the formation was too huge for one or two sabres to make a difference. maybe he did not want to lose a good man to a lost cause.

also which day did it happen? i am assuming it was on the day the migs bombed the runway?

This historical blunder happened on the last operational day of No.14 Squadron at Tejgaon airbase Dhaka. It was 6th Dec 1971.

Sqn Ldr Dilawar was not alone. He was leading a formation of F-86 Sabres (and had AIM-9B Sidewinders too) to intercept an incoming IAF attack formation. When Dilawar started to taxi, over the radio, Air Commodore Inam-ul-Haq (most probably)/OC Wing Cmdre Afzal Chaudry ordered him to abort the mission and inspect the air defence guns.

Dilawar replied that he has already inspected the air defence guns and now its urgent to intercept the indian formation but the commander refused to admit anything and ordered bluntly to switch off the engine.

Dilawar stopped taxing. At this time, the ground crew was also watching the whole drama and one technician rushed towards the leading F-86 Sabre of Dilawar. Dilawar was extremely frustrated and was throwing his hands here and there in the cockpit. He told the technician that he has been ordered to abort.

Attack started. Dilawar and other ground crew were watching the whole attack and suddenly he noted that two Su-7s are circling above the airfield while all others were strafing the airfield aimlessly and engaging the attention of gunners.

Dilawar told this technician that the real mission is of those two Su-7s. After taking careful aim, these two Su-7s dived on the runway and completely put it out of use.

Now had the PAF formation taken off, they could have at least intercepted those two Su-7s that posed extreme threat to the runway. A seasoned pilot like Dilawar could have noted the planes that were posing greater threat to the runway and could have attempted to shoot them down.

History was looking to Dilawar and his fellow junior pilots but at the end they preferred their own careers. He later became Air Marshal and commanded PAC kamra.

Its important to mention here that this is not metioned in any book and was narrated to me by a Technician who served in No.14 Squadron at Dhaka. He also mentioned that his courage was too much appreciated by senior officers and they wanted to take him inside the helicopter to Burma and then to West Pakistan but a squadron leader was weeping like kids to get into the helicopter and thus he was left in Dhaka to enjoy the Indian captivity.

It was after achieving complete air superiority that IAF started open ground attack and even governor house and Army HQ and just about everything. Even if this single squadron had denied the air superiority to India, the war could have been prolonged to an extent that UN would force a cease fire and surrender could have been averted.
 
Last edited:
one thing that always baffles me is that 2 days before laying down his arms...AK NIAZI said that we will fight till the last drop of blood for our country...and the reoprter asked which country he said my country PAKISTAN...i saw the video on youtube....i am baffled to why 2 days later did they surrender... i mean go down fighting... but oh well i dunno whatever happened happened for the best because bangladesh would have destablised pakistan anyways 1 nation divided by enemy territory is like GAZA & RAMALLAH...!!
 
Gen AAK Niazi and some other Army Generals proved to be the men of courage by staying with their troops instead of fleeing away in helicopters like the Eastern Command of PAF and leaving behind the whole personnel. This was despite the fact that Army Aviation had more helicopters than Eastern Command of PAF.

shebazi thank you for the informative posts.

i have small correction in order. air commodore inam was a POW in india. read many sources - as well as one personal anecdote. my grandfather said he met inam when he was on way to kolkatta after the war on way to POW camp. he was with niazi and other senior officers. he exchanged only regular 'haal theek hai' comments.

he also told me that inam was highly decorated officer, or was given an big award by pakistan after the war was over that very few got. but he wasnt too happy about it when he met him.

Dilawar told this technician that the real mission is of those two Su-7s. After taking careful aim, these two Su-7s dived on the runway and completely put it out of use.

these got to be Migs as there is a great article by the mig pilots on how they bombed the runway. but one thing about the MiGs they cannot outturn a sabre. and they did not have guns to shoot them down. so if they were carrying bombs the migs were defenceless except for getaway speed
 
Last edited:
shebazi thank you for the informative posts.

i have small correction in order. air commodore inam was a POW in india. read many sources - as well as one personal anecdote. my grandfather said he met inam when he was on way to kolkatta after the war on way to POW camp. he was with niazi and other senior officers. he exchanged only regular 'haal theek hai' comments.

he also told me that inam was highly decorated officer, or was given an big award by pakistan after the war was over that very few got. but he wasnt too happy about it when he met him.



these got to be Migs as there is a great article by the mig pilots on how they bombed the runway. but one thing about the MiGs they cannot outturn a sabre. and they did not have guns to shoot them down. so if they were carrying bombs the migs were defenceless except for getaway speed


Thanks for info on Inam, if Inam was present then this point loses its importance.

For Migs attacking the runway, yes this seems to be the Indian version but I mentioned whatever I was told by that PAF technician. He was not some ordinary staff, he retired as Hon Flt Lt and was awarded with TK1, TK2 and TK3.

For getting another point of view, perhaps A/C Inam himself or Air Marshal (R) Dilawar Hussian or any other officer/staff present at Dhaka can be the source. I think this forum should start some interviews too. It would be really interesting.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom