I posted your media covering the crash, now tell me which aircraft crashed with official source that it was not a JF-17.As you are the one making indian FAKE NEWS claims the onus is on you to provide the CREDIBLE & GENUINE evidence that proves otherwise. If not then it means you are lying and making it all up like all indians do..................
That’s what I said, JF-17B Twin seater with door hinges, by the way you were saying it is a photoshop?
Do you have any pic of a Wind tunnel testing facility in PAC Kamra?
Indian MOD claiming to shoot down F-16 then giving no proof has to be the biggest sanghi dhoti twist in the world [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]
That is the youtube channel of your Mainstream news media covering it, with visuals.Youtube and Twitter are NOT GENUINE and CREDIBLE media...........................
If you had a brain you be dangerous, Pakistan producing Chinese fighter which China doesn't even field however let me introduce you to your pride and joy.
Mukti's didn't pound CTG port, your subs didn't disappear in Indian Ocean in search for Muktis, neither did Gen Niazi surrendered to Muktis or did he?
You're doing exactly what you allege I am doing. If PAC is not big or comparable to HAL, then why are you comparing the in the first place? Tell me when you start making carbon composites for air crafts, it'll be a first step at 'comparison with HAL' game. Not your so-called export of Chinese jets which they advertise around the world as their own.As i said in the OP, it's in Indian nature to demean others.....PAC may not be as big as HAL but it's building and exporting to foreign customers both trainers and fighters.....let me know when HAL achieves the same so save your self from further embarrassment..
Share credible proof not some fanmade BS.
Your proof is LCA Tejas.If what I say is not true then post the CREDIBLE & GENUINE evidence that proves otherwise.........
www.naval-technology.com
We are discussing the present, not the future. Carbon composites are an important and expensive part of aircraft designs around the world, so it is a holy grail. It has been used from F-22 to almost every modern fighter jet as well as passenger aircraft. Just because something is smaller, it doesn't automatically equate to quality. It's a lame way of thinking.
U Ota be ashamed of ur self my brother. That's alian tech u making fun of, ita not a gun like u know it.Indians on PDF, due to their nature, often refer to products such as JF-17 built in Pakistan Aeronautical Complex (PAC) as a mere paint job. Albeit the sheer frustration and heartburn is understandable. However, since the Indians claim that their LCA Tejas is indigenous and pride product of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) . Let's compare the two respective aircraft for their paint job and workmanship.
Tejas, Excellent paint job.
View attachment 716514
But a close look at the aircraft reveals some average workmanship.
View attachment 716515
Underneath the aircraft, it seems like patchwork and gun casing and surrounding has very basic if not poor finish.
View attachment 716520
JF-17 Thunder. An Average Paint Job.
View attachment 716521
Workmanship and Finishing.
View attachment 716523
View attachment 716522
JF-17 Gun Port.
View attachment 716525
Hope that clears the doubt as who is good at paint jobs and who is professional in workmanship.
Americans didn't design or develop the jet, did they? JF 17 is a Chinese jet, not a Russian jet because it uses Klimov engines. So, again you asked if there is an Indian designed and developed jet. There is, and it is Tejas. Anything else?
