Over100 US air sorties confront over 300 Chinese air sorties in east China sea.

[etylo]

Over 3 days continuously, more than 300 Chinese air sorties confronted over 100 US air sorties in East China Sea lately according to Taiwanese military source. Does anyone still doubt the reliability of Chinese engines that are commonly installed on these Chinese planes after the testings in this incident ?


The detailed article is in English:

時論廣場》美中戰機台海摸底 國安要有對策（張延廷） - 時論廣場

美中軍機日前在台灣東部海域上空展開全天候對抗，而且連續3天，美軍派出逾100架次戰機測試中共輪戰能力，中共則派出300多架次升空應對，由於雙方派遣架次甚多，我方雖全程監控掌握，但也只能作壁上觀的角色。而且此

www-chinatimes-com.translate.goog

 

[Irfan Baloch]

Over 3 days, more than 300 Chinese fighters confronted over 100 US fighters in East China Sea lately according to Taiwanese military source. Does anyone still doubt the reliability of Chinese engines that are commonly installed on these Chinese planes after the testings in this incident ?


The detailed article is in English:

時論廣場》美中戰機台海摸底 國安要有對策（張延廷） - 時論廣場

美中軍機日前在台灣東部海域上空展開全天候對抗，而且連續3天，美軍派出逾100架次戰機測試中共輪戰能力，中共則派出300多架次升空應對，由於雙方派遣架次甚多，我方雖全程監控掌握，但也只能作壁上觀的角色。而且此

www-chinatimes-com.translate.goog

no doubt about the reliability of Chinese technology including their jet engines.
the only thing open for debate is the claim about how good or better they are compared to established Icons in the West.

 

[Tornado23]

I just played Battlfield 4 yesterday. Now it seems like it's gonna happen irl.

So...whose gonna rendezook who?

 

[VCheng]

no doubt about the reliability of Chinese technology including their jet engines.
the only thing open for debate is the claim about how good or better they are compared to established Icons in the West.

Claims do not matter but data like MTBF and MTBO do, that can be compared.

 

[etylo]

I just played Battlfield 4 yesterday. Now it seems like it's gonna happen irl.

So...whose gonna rendezook who?

According to similar report, the US fighters didnt have any advantage over Chinese fighters and went away in the end. There were no Chinese fighters broke down or called back during the entire confrontation according to Taiwanese source.

 

[Tornado23]

According to similar report, the US fighters didnt have any advantage over Chinese fighters and went away in the end. There were no Chinese fighters broke down or called back during the entire confrontation according to Taiwanese source.

Ok

 

[AlKardai]

I just played Battlfield 4 yesterday. Now it seems like it's gonna happen irl.

So...whose gonna rendezook who?

Knowing the reliability of the f35, I think the gameplay of this fight will be closer to B 2042

 

[TheSolution]

The uncertainty wasn't about their reliability, judging by their prolific use throughout the PLAAF they are obviously quite reliable and meet a benchmark.

But the question is how things like MTBO, maintenance, service life, etc compares to engines in the west and if it's truly surpassed the Russians.

For things like this you can't simply go with speculation and hearsay but rather provide evidence which none of you could...

 

[huanghong]

The uncertainty wasn't about their reliability, judging by their prolific use throughout the PLAAF they are obviously quite reliable and meet a benchmark.

But the question is how things like MTBO, maintenance, service life, etc compares to engines in the west and if it's truly surpassed the Russians.

For things like this you can't simply go with speculation and hearsay but rather provide evidence which none of you could...

The only clear official news is, that Life of main bearings in aircraft engine of china has exceeded 50,000 hours. I'm not sure what the figures are for Western countries?
https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1748592002879167162&wfr=spider&for=pc

 

[Tornado23]

Knowing the reliability of the f35, I think the gameplay of this fight will be closer to B 2042

Ew we don't talk about 2042

 

[That Guy]

Over 3 days continuously, more than 300 Chinese fighters confronted over 100 US fighters in East China Sea lately according to Taiwanese military source. Does anyone still doubt the reliability of Chinese engines that are commonly installed on these Chinese planes after the testings in this incident ?


The detailed article is in English:

時論廣場》美中戰機台海摸底 國安要有對策（張延廷） - 時論廣場

美中軍機日前在台灣東部海域上空展開全天候對抗，而且連續3天，美軍派出逾100架次戰機測試中共輪戰能力，中共則派出300多架次升空應對，由於雙方派遣架次甚多，我方雖全程監控掌握，但也只能作壁上觀的角色。而且此

www-chinatimes-com.translate.goog

The fact that you're using this article to prove that Chinese engines are reliable kinda isn't doing you any favors. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that it's a pretty pathetic attempt.

 

[beijingwalker]

We're going to see more F-35 "crashings" coming...

 

[etylo]

The fact that you're using this article to prove that Chinese engines are reliable kinda isn't doing you any favors. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that it's a pretty pathetic attempt.

i think you are drunk dont know what you are talking about.

 

[Abid123]

The people who doubt Chinese engines are in minority. Most importantly PAF does not doubt Chinese engines which the reason they are buying lots of J-10s with Chinese engine.

 

[Irfan Baloch]

Claims do not matter but data like MTBF and MTBO do, that can be compared.

I got now clue what these two acronyms mean.
and I wont even bother. for me Western technology means perfection, quality and durability.

talking about technology. the only thing from the East that has stood its ground in front of West is Japanese (and recently South Korean) automotive industry other than that a lot of promise and hot air but nothing ground breaking that will smash Western technology to oblivion.