What's new

Ousted Prime Minister Imran Khan Arrested: News and Discussion

Is Martial Law/Emergency a real possibility after IK arrest?

  • Yes

    Votes: 145 63.6%
  • No

    Votes: 83 36.4%

  • Total voters
    228
  • Poll closed .
What an excellent interview.

MA:“By burning ambulances?”

Interviewer: Not everyone was burning ambulance…

MA: Madam. You mustn’t be aware of the facts!!

Interviewer: I was there on the ground!

Shots fired!!!

View attachment 929313
The interviewer is as biased as PTI supporters. Just because you like someone does not mean wrongs become right.
 
. .
1683904030519.png

1683904068243.png

1683904111711.png
 
. .
The interviewer is as biased as PTI supporters. Just because you like someone does not mean wrongs become right.
1683904158572.png


That’s wrong the reason the police are there is because of situation already mentioned by many learned people including ex military people.

We should mock the master planners but not our Fauj, who by and large are victims in all of this.


Update:
30 officers of Pakistan Army have resigned or relieved of their duties.
 
Last edited:
. . . .


This is huge news, a pleasant surprise in all doom and gloom.

The words of Khalilzad are important as well as the news about Asim Munir finally about to be sidelined, with growing resentment in top brass against him.

IK taking Asim Munir name and directly blaming him is not in isolation.

He is US special advisor, think thank to Afghanistan affairs, and he and US acknowledged the big efforts IK did for the safe exit of so many western countries, US staff from there. And PTI's/IK role in settling the Afghan. crisis amicably and without bloodshed.

Now Pakistans Afghan policy is in a mess.
 
Last edited:
. . . . .
486991_6946734_updates.jpg

Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman on Friday announced to hold a “peaceful" sit-in outside the Supreme Court in Islamabad on May 15 (Monday) against Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial for “facilitating” and giving “VIP protocol” to Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan.

In his fiery news conference, PDM president Maulana Fazlur Rahman alleged that the country’s Constitution, law and everything have been put at risk for the sake of the PTI chairman.


He made the remarks a day after a top court’s three-member bench headed by CJP Bandial declared Khan’s arrest on the premises of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) in the Al-Qadir Trust case as “invalid and unlawful”. During the course of proceedings, the CJP welcomed the former prime minister — who was deposed from the office last April via a no-confidence motion — saying “Good to see you”.

The ruling alliance of 13 political parties, however, largely criticised the CJP for welcoming Khan into the courtroom.

During the presser, the PDM chief — who is also head of the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) — said that the top court ordered not to take action against Khan for the incidents after May 9. He added that the judiciary was giving rulings beyond the Constitution.

Blasting the apex court, the PDM chief said the leniency was given to three-time prime minister Nawaz Sharif. Fazl said even Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) supremo was not provided a telephone to inquire about the health of her ailing wife — Kulsoom Nawaz.

“Was this kind of leniency given to Maryam Nawaz or Faryal Talpur?” the JUI-F chief asked.

But on the other hand, Khan was being given “VIP protocol”, he added.

The PDM chairman further announced that they have decided to stage a protest against the “behaviour” of the Supreme Court.

Referring to the Supreme Court’s 3-2 verdict on elections in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, the PDM chief said that they were not ready to accept the decision.

On March 1, the apex court ruled, in a 3-2 verdict, that the elections should be held in the two provinces within 90 days.

However, on April 7, the controversy surrounding the top court’s verdict on Punjab elections took another turn after Justice Athar Minallah, in his detailed order, stated that the case was dismissed by 4 to 3 and clarified that “he had not recused nor had any reason to dissociate himself” from the case.

The PDM chief said, “According to us, the decision of 4-3 is a unanimous decision.”

Responding to a question, the PDM chairman vowed that the sit-in will remain “peaceful” but warned that if they were manhandled, then they will give a curt reply.




But isn't Islamabad under article 144 and all the protests are banned? :lol:
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom