muse
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2006
- Messages
- 13,006
- Reaction score
- 0
So, not just a tempest in a teapot anymore, eh? So many well, intentioned persons have argued that this is a one of kind of thing - but they have not done their research - earlier a Pakistani Parliamentary delegation was handled in the same way -- what is one to make of all this?
That there a multiplicity of power centers within the US government is a given and that these opposing centers express their "sentiments" towards each other by exerting themselves on persons and policies the other centers support is also a given. Now, what of the Pakistanis, will anything change by trying to brush this stuff under the carpet?
What is the SUBSTANCE of this relationship between US and Pakistan, some immediately will point to F16 and US humanitarian assistance - Pakistanis fascination with F16s is morbid, a piece of machinery is said to be the substance between two countries - absurd? you be the judge. And what of humanitarian aid? US is the most prolific donor of humanitarian aid through out history and in the present situation, Pakistanis are grateful - but is this the substance of the relationship, one side gives aid and the other's role is to be grateful?
Between Pakistan and US there is a great deal of acrimony and disguised hostility and aggression - the more this is hidden or ignored the more it expresses itself openly - greater distance between these countries is absolutely essential - Pakistan OUGHT to want correct relations with US based on commercial ties, nothing more. Why?
Over the short term an d long term Pakistan is required to provide services to achieve US goals in the region - Pakistan is also required to facilitate the goals of US's strategic ally in the region and to integrate itself as a "heavy lifter", into the policy framework of the US's strategic ally - Pakistan finds that it's interest are served in neither of these. For a majority of Pakistanis, the notion that an enemy of China, is a enemy of Pakistan, is and OUGHT to be, God's truth, the US and it's strategic ally are determined that this truth must be determined to be false by both Pakistan and China.
To achieve it's goals, a wider regional war is a strong possibility - where will Pakistan stand, will it abandon it's true friend and ally in the pursuit of F16s and such? Will Pakistan accept that it's international goal is to be the furtherance of the US's strategic allys' ambitions?
Friends say "Muse, you have changed" - but is our role to be nothing other than cheerleader for US policies that are a mortal danger to Pakistan and to US interests?
SUBSTANCE, what is the substance of these relations with the US and vice versa?
That there a multiplicity of power centers within the US government is a given and that these opposing centers express their "sentiments" towards each other by exerting themselves on persons and policies the other centers support is also a given. Now, what of the Pakistanis, will anything change by trying to brush this stuff under the carpet?
What is the SUBSTANCE of this relationship between US and Pakistan, some immediately will point to F16 and US humanitarian assistance - Pakistanis fascination with F16s is morbid, a piece of machinery is said to be the substance between two countries - absurd? you be the judge. And what of humanitarian aid? US is the most prolific donor of humanitarian aid through out history and in the present situation, Pakistanis are grateful - but is this the substance of the relationship, one side gives aid and the other's role is to be grateful?
Between Pakistan and US there is a great deal of acrimony and disguised hostility and aggression - the more this is hidden or ignored the more it expresses itself openly - greater distance between these countries is absolutely essential - Pakistan OUGHT to want correct relations with US based on commercial ties, nothing more. Why?
Over the short term an d long term Pakistan is required to provide services to achieve US goals in the region - Pakistan is also required to facilitate the goals of US's strategic ally in the region and to integrate itself as a "heavy lifter", into the policy framework of the US's strategic ally - Pakistan finds that it's interest are served in neither of these. For a majority of Pakistanis, the notion that an enemy of China, is a enemy of Pakistan, is and OUGHT to be, God's truth, the US and it's strategic ally are determined that this truth must be determined to be false by both Pakistan and China.
To achieve it's goals, a wider regional war is a strong possibility - where will Pakistan stand, will it abandon it's true friend and ally in the pursuit of F16s and such? Will Pakistan accept that it's international goal is to be the furtherance of the US's strategic allys' ambitions?
Friends say "Muse, you have changed" - but is our role to be nothing other than cheerleader for US policies that are a mortal danger to Pakistan and to US interests?
SUBSTANCE, what is the substance of these relations with the US and vice versa?