What's new

New JF-17 Squadron to be raised

Had the Asad Regime not had the support of the Russians they may well have fallen.

Had the Assad regime not the support of Pakistani die hard, and northern alliance animals, it would have fallen far before Russia jumped in, which was upon requests of Iran regime.
Whereas, ground reality is... on daily basis Asad's airforce bomb and gas civilians on sectarian grounds.
We all know, Libya was attacked because NATO said Qaddafi is about to bomb his own people, so they preempted on humanitarian grounds.
Why than Asad is allowed to practically aerial bomb Syrian civilians on DAILY basis and hypocrite America and NATO not even talk about it?
Today al-Hamouriyah town was aerial bombed and many children died, yesterday was Douma and there were civilian deaths too, on 13th Idlib refugee camp was aerial bombed, 12th, it was Douma again...... and it goes on daily.
 
Last edited:
.
There was a need to have a rapid BVR and high tech response at the western border and it made sense to exchange squadrons out at Samungli when the unofficial deployment was already carried out.

The more interesting bit is that the F-16s are now fully focused on eastern AD .

Sargodha and shahbaz are centered so they can go east as well as west compared to say smungli which focused on south and west
 
.
Had the Assad regime not the support of Pakistani die hard, and northern alliance animals, it would have fallen far before Russia jumped in, which was upon requests of Iran regime.
Whereas, ground reality is... on daily basis Asad's airforce bomb and gas civilians on sectarian grounds.
We all know, Libya was attacked because NATO said Qaddafi is about to bomb his own people, so they preempted on humanitarian grounds.
Why than Asad is allowed to practically aerial bomb Syrian civilians on DAILY basis and hypocrite America and NATO not even talk about it?
Today al-Hamouriyah town was aerial bombed and many children died, yesterday was Douma and there were civilian deaths too, on 13th Idlib refugee camp was aerial bombed, 12th, it was Douma again...... and it goes on daily.
because of two points
1. libya was oil country, so high expectaiton of new govt
2. US did suppotted rebels and did as much as it could but than came isis and eveyrthing chnaged than turkey kurds, shia, iraq and lack of arab unity and russia all helped assad
 
.
Sargodha and shahbaz are centered so they can go east as well as west compared to say smungli which focused on south and west
Sargodha isnt as centered as Shahbaz, but Shahbaz’s assets aren’t useful against the western threat.
 
. . . .
Well the US may “side” with India but there is divided opinions inside the US state as well. We have our sympathizers in there too who slip us little whispers now and then as well. They want India rising to compete with China but just enough to where they aren’t upsetting the balance they want against other countries.

What do you suggest we should convey to the U.S.
(Counter China with India, "We have no problem with that, but remember you shouldn't undermine Pakistan to the extent that when it's time for you to counter India, you don't find Pakistan anywhere)
 
. .
Just cross check this from PAF sources , I am saying this with some concrete thing.

Can you elaborate a bit more on this threat? Is it from Iran or from some Gulf country in South-west?
 
.
What do you suggest we should convey to the U.S.
(Counter China with India, "We have no problem with that, but remember you shouldn't undermine Pakistan to the extent that when it's time for you to counter India, you don't find Pakistan anywhere)
Nope, just basically suggest to them that we will make it so that it costs them the $1000 per meal versus the $10 it costs them to bring it to their troops. They cannot afford this war as it is and it is showing in the budget deficit.
 
. .
What do you suggest we should convey to the U.S.
(Counter China with India, "We have no problem with that, but remember you shouldn't undermine Pakistan to the extent that when it's time for you to counter India, you don't find Pakistan anywhere)
No disrespect to anyone and not starting a flame war, but unless the US wants to destroy Pakistan itself, if it uses India there maybe a big dent in the sensus in the region next time. Needless to say 1/2 of the world's population rssides in this region and besides a few rats(and their fleas) and mice not much would be left here in case of a subcontinent war. This maybe how the game is eventually played by coaxing one against the other in the process destroying Pak lands which are a threat to the planners. Who cares whether there are a few dhotis less in India(or none at all), Bangladesh or Sri Lanka and a large population in China may well go with the irradiated winds from the region. The rest may be easier to be dealt with. I really fear that our political leadership is too short sighted to see the great game that is being played.
A
 
.
Needless to say 1/2 of the world's population rssides in this region and besides a few rats(and their fleas) and mice not much would be left here in case of a subcontinent war.

Eventual objective of new world order is population control... let's say even if India survive in war with Pakistan. They are destined to face some other type of misery e.g. industrial accident, epidemic etc. which will reduce its population to the control able level.
 
.
Eventual objective of new world order is population control... let's say even if India survive in war with Pakistan. They are destined to face some other type of misery e.g. industrial accident, epidemic etc. which will reduce its population to the control able level.
Yara with our current missile coverage and the lack of trust, I suspect the moment a missile is fired without knowing whether it is conventional or not there will be an exchange. If that thought process is true then why give the enemy a chance to fire their assetts? I dont think MAD will be too far away in the equation when one considers whag is involved. There are so many other considerations but my fear is they will all be put to the side and it will be a war for survival in which no one will win.
A
 
.
Back
Top Bottom