What's new

NATO fuel tankers set ablaze in Pakistan

Frosty relations between the U.S. and Pakistan - which led to Pakistan closing its border to Afghanistan-bound truck traffic- haven't helped, either.
The Pentagon is increasingly relying on parachute drops of fuel and other supplies to bases in remote parts of Afghanistan, and as Nathan Hodge of the Wall Street Journal reports, the military estimates such deliveries are spiking the ultimate price of a gallon of fuel to as much as $400 per gallon.
Isn't $400 the price of air dropping the fuel because of closure of border with Pakistan.

U.S.'s Afghan Headache: $400-a-Gallon Gasoline

From your article

Since 2005, the Air Force has increased by nearly 50 times the amount of supplies it air-drops to remote bases, partly as a way to avoid dangerous land-based fuel convoys.

The astronomical expense represents the "fully burdened" costs of fuel, including transportation and security.

The cost and difficulty of fuel deliveries in places like Afghanistan is one major reason the Pentagon is working to overhaul the way the armed forces use energy, from developing aircraft that can run on biofuels to powering remote bases with solar panels or wind turbines.

But those efforts are in the early stages, meaning troops still require expensive—and hair-raising—cargo flights to keep them flush with gas.
 
.
35000 live worth of honor eh, or blowing up shrines and schoold kind of honor :lol:

Kashmiris are doing fine, apart from occasional neighborly terrorist pig being shot there, you hardly hear of bombs or killings there.

Atleast we aren't raining bombs on them and terming it "Collateral Damages".


Thats Called RAW agents doing all those terrorist things
 
.
Frosty relations between the U.S. and Pakistan - which led to Pakistan closing its border to Afghanistan-bound truck traffic- haven't helped, either.
The Pentagon is increasingly relying on parachute drops of fuel and other supplies to bases in remote parts of Afghanistan, and as Nathan Hodge of the Wall Street Journal reports, the military estimates such deliveries are spiking the ultimate price of a gallon of fuel to as much as $400 per gallon.
Isn't $400 the price of air dropping the fuel because of closure of border with Pakistan.

U.S.'s Afghan Headache: $400-a-Gallon Gasoline

I don't think so, military fuel (used in Afghanistan) is much more expensive than the regular fuel we use in our cars & other vehicles.
 
.
The political economy of NATO trucks

The US and NATO depended heavily on Pakistan for logistic support and a large percentage of the supplies to their troops in Afghanistan when the Afghanistan war began in 2001.

"But after constant attacks on our supplies, we decided to find an alternative route in 2007," said John Arlington, who represents a major contractor in Dubai. "In 2011, less than 40 percent of all NATO and ISAF supplies go through Pakistan."

Arlington explained how truck trade works. "Front-end companies get contracts in DC, and outsource contracts to businessmen in Dubai, who then outsource to trucking companies in Afghanistan and Pakistan."

The business has been so profitable in Pakistan that most transporters have started working exclusively for NATO suppliers, and there is a serious truck shortage, said Umer Ansari, a middle manager in Karachi who looks after supply chain management. "We are paying Rs 124,000 to Rs 130,000 per trip from Karachi to Faisalabad as opposed to Rs 95,000 three months ago."

The Karachi Port Trust (KPT) charges a levy of Rs 400 per container of NATO supplies, and the Qasim International Containers Terminal (QICT) charges another Rs400.

Traders say Pakistani sub-contractors earn $250 million to $300 million a year. "But profits comes with risks," said Muhammad Azam, 38, originally from Wana but living in Karachi.

In mid 2000s, an arrested terrorist disclosed that his group had been trained in suicide bombing by Baitullah Mehsud and was asked to attack NATO trucks. Contractors abducted by the Taliban have to pay ransoms as high as $35 million.

Americans have built one of the largest consulates of the world in Karachi and have repeatedly sought the assistance British diplomats to engage with MQM - a key political party in Karachi - to maintain peace in the city. According to one source, the ANP has huge stakes in NATO supplies and has strong influence among Karachi's transporters. Transporters who deal with NATO supplies are often Mehsuds and Afridis from the tribal belt.

"Its one of the toughest jobs in the world," sub-contractor Abdul Hakim Mehsud said. "Over 13 of my trucks and three of my drivers have vanished in interior Sindh recently. But the profit margins are high and that keeps me motivated."

According to Mathew Irvin, a security consultant for NATO/ISAF in Afghanistan and Pakistan, the recent attacks on NATO supplies in Interior Sindh that began after 2009 are used by the Pakistani security establishment to pressure the US. "Some sub-contractors also report fake attacks to carry out insurance fraud," he said. At least on one occasion, a sub-contractor was caught and fined.

"Gawadar is an alternative port, but it is not operational yet," said Brigadier (r) Shaukat Qadir. He said Pakistan received payments for NATO supplies and it was therefore important for Pakistan to ensure the supplies were not disrupted. Asked who is behind attacks on trucks carrying NATO supplies, he said, "My guess would be TTP and its affiliates, the Punjabi Taliban."

"In December 2008, militants destroyed 400 containers carrying food, fuel, and military vehicles," a NATO source said. After that, NATO and ISAF began paying tribes to ensure trucks reached their destination."

"The attacks are not likely to stop any time soon," according to a foreign diplomat, "but we have made pacts with warlords, tribes and various stakeholders in Pakistan who ensure safe transit of the goods. They include political parties both in Pakistan and Afghanistan." According to a contractor, those who profit from the business include "sacred cows".

Another Interesting Read
'Tough way to do business'
 
.
I don't think so, military fuel (used in Afghanistan) is much more expensive than the regular fuel we use in our cars & other vehicles.
I'm pretty sure it is........but the figure of $400 you quoted is for "Parachuting a barrel of fuel to a remote Afghan base"
 
. . .

Never sell fire insurance to a guy with a clapped out truck and a match.

Intersting though why aviation fuel?

Mr Tanoli says the police carried on their investigations and the facts eventually came to light.

"We have now arrested some drivers and their helpers," he said.

"The people behind them are not residents in the district, but we have issued warrants for their arrest."

He added that there have been incidents in which fuel for aircraft has been sold off.
 
.
We're missing the bigger picture.

The question is what are these loaded trucks doing in the first place? All NATO supplies should be returned to source immediately.

The answer is that Pakistani politicians are lying scum. They are just holding their breath until public anger dies down so they can resume business as usual. The whole NATO supply chain logistics remain firmly in place.
 
.
Now offload all of them at nearest petrol stations due to security concerns and put on some SALE SALE SALE SALE .... What took them so long and what the eff are these supplies still doing in Pakistan ????
 
. .
if US care so confident that you have alternative supply routes, then why do you keep on repeating the hope that in near future it can be reopened. US you are just a jackal in lion's skin.
 
.
Boys,

If the fuel wasn't paid for by NATO then its a loss to us, if it was fully paid in advance then good one !!
 
.
How in God's name did Kashmir get into this discussion of NATO supplies?

Because our Indian friends have simply no interest in the thread or the title or Nato. All they want to do is talk about Maoists and of course Kashmir. Its truely incredible how they even admit the reason why they are on this thread is because they object about other threads that are about Maoists etc? Whats the logic in that? Beggers belief how the topic if Kashmir has been forced into this thread! The obsession is simply too much!
On topic - i suppose we will never know if the tankers were emptied first and had their content sold before being "destroyed". Would make sense!! :azn:
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom