I see that you accept my judgment but lash out at others in your bitterness. Of course, you're not alone - most of the nation of Pakistan grasps the same straws. But what excuse do you have to continue blaming others when you clearly know better? Why are you so lazy and indolent? Why no resolve to make a difference for the better, yourself, today?
May be I should speak in Urdu, perhaps its opposite day and I suddenly can comprehend English better than a native English speaker... Maybe you can understand Urdu better to come to your weird conclusions when I say North you say South (or Acceptance).
I do it every day - my contributions have caused even your own countrymen embarrassing your president in front of all his Nato allies by booing down his vicious drone bombings. You were decrying my nation?
This is an irrelevant distraction.
To create an accurate generalization one must have many supporting specific examples that can be evaluated, then supported by statistics.
The impression created is that it's preferable for the U.S. to do the dirty work while Pakistan pretends its hands are clean.
No, I meant it personally. Why are you attempting to cower behind a crowd?
It depends. If the Tsar signs an order to kill 100,000 innocent people and a "blood-thirsty maniac" cossack kills 1,000 of these, they are both villains - and the "reasonable" one without blood on his hands, who killed 100,000 people with a mere drop of ink, is the greater one. Only the "maniac" who goes around killing cossacks and blowing up tsars could be counted as a hero - and maybe not even then.
I hold that you're the one who is deluded, Asim. And you're hanging on to that delusion for what, exactly?
Once again, you act like you are privy to all the evidences that were put forth before the honourable judges. Some Intelligence reports may have been deemed unfit for public consumption which we don't know about
No need to be privy. It's sufficient to note that the charge of the judges differs in character from their final conclusions.
UNSCR 1373, U.S. self-defence, Wazirstan is thus an open battlefield, and from the statistics kept by NAF the drone operators appear to be doing a very responsible job considering their quarrys' employment of human armor; it's not like carpet-bombing or leveling villages.
I will not respond to your ridiculous statement which was posted after this one, it does a good job of exposing common US morality, mentality and intelligence.
I think so, but you have yet to explain why it can be characterized as "ridiculous".
Nonsense. If I'm asked to prove whether or not you wrote a document, does that have anything to do with the fact that I discovered you pick your nose?
To get justice in the courts is a rare experience in Pakistan AND knowledge of legal matters is at a low level. Don't think the SC isn't aware of that - gaining your respect is an important motivation for them since they are a political institution, as described previously.
You state that a responsible job is being done when even US statistics shows there are more civilian deaths than you are implying.
I believe the justified that he wrote the note by referring to forensic evidence. I know that you probably do not have much experience reading court reports but I must inform you that inference must be used to glean their point.
It is not political, your point, which I must ask you to repeat, did not seem political to me. Again, my respect grew due to the sense found in the document, if he were not involved, I would have had my respect increased then too!
I don't recall "implying" anything specific, just pointing out that the drone strikes are apparently being carried out with little collateral damage compared to conventional bombing techniques, or even Pakmil offensives.
I was referring to the statements beyond the remit of the fact-finding commission.
To repeat, the SC has been a political creature ever since it endorsed the "Doctrine of Necessity" making itself the judge of extra-legal activity. Now, with this report, they move into the realm of judging LEGAL activities as well.
New America Foundation The drone strikes appear to be getting more accurate over time.
And that of Haqqani's lawyers, quoted previously in the thread.
The SC has legitimized all coups and dictatorships since.
Of course not. You tell me.
Perhaps I should have worded myself better. From a Neutral, non-Pakistani and non-American source. Something like the Guardian will do for me
I believe you are forgetting that his lawyers will obviously argue their point is right.
That does not mean this court supports coups and your deflection is noted
I feel this is unworthy of a response. How desperate do you assume one should be for the implementation of justice according to the laws of the land?
