To those muslim friends, I actually do not support every decision of China government .For instance, I thought Kim regime should be get rid of 20 years ago.
But in this issue of Uighur, I am afraid you people just mistake the cause and the reaction.
There are no such rules and regulations in Xinjiang province before.
As I said above, there were no Uighur wearing Veil and robe，and only some elder Uighur bearded 20 years ago.
Uighur ethnic has its unique culture. So no regulations and rules at all.
But now when I watch some scenes in Xinjiang province , I could not even believe my eye that I have a mistake what I saw was an unsecular Arabian society.
Could any friend muslim or no muslim tell me what does that mean ?
These rules which don't exist until recent years is a reaction to the present reality that extremism has been spreading in the muslim world.
China government mustn't do nothing and just wait to see Xinjing province turn to be a ME frequently.
Just say thank you to SALAFI OR WAHHABI OR TAKFIRI radical teaching being exported worldwide funded by the abundant Petrodollar money to take over the local Muslim and disrupt the targeted nations during the last 30 years with much increased intensity in the last 10 years. Riyadh is working hand in hand with the CIA and Washington to expand the influences of this radical movement to create revolution every where...
Ordo ab Chao! "Order Out of Chaos." "Divide & Conquer."
Btw, here is an informative article, rare of its kind, about the differences between the Saudi's
Salafi/Wahhabi/Takfiri vs
Sunni, as articulated
by those experts from al-Azhar University in Cairo. One should know the differences to have the more correct views as well as to understand
the underlying problems of the radicalizations within the last three decades, the phenomenon of ISIS/ISIL/IS/LEVANT/DAESH is just the tip of the iceberg!
I posted it earlier
here:
Grozny conference challenges the Saudis
By Tahir Mustafa - Dhu al-Hijjah 29, 1437 (2016-10-01)
[...]
After spending more than $100 billion over four decades to try and buy the loyalty of Muslims around the world, the Saudi Wahhabis received a tight slap on their collective face from none other than the Shaykh of al-Azhar, Dr. Ahmed el-Tayeb. The stinging rebuke was delivered at a conference in Grozny, Chechnya at the end of August (August 25–27), which was attended by hundreds of leading Islamic scholars from the Muslim world. Shaykh al-Tayeb said that the Salafis — the label preferred by the Wahhabis themselves — are not “Sunnis.”
To understand the true import of this statement, consider this. The
Salafis and their even more extreme offshoot, the
takfiris, are certainly not Shi‘is — the other branch of Islam. The Salafis consider themselves authentic Sunnis, in fact, super Sunnis and insist others must follow them. This claim has not only been challenged by the head of the most prestigious Islamic institution in the Muslim world, al-Azhar University in Cairo, but they have been banished from the fold of Islam altogether!
Some
200 Sunni scholars from around the world participated in the Grozny conference at the invitation of the Yemeni Sufi scholar, al-Habib Ali al-Jafri. What was the conference convened to discuss? To define the term Ahl al-Sunnah wa-al-Jama‘ah, which a myriad of “Sunni” groups have used to claim authenticity and legitimacy to their particular interpretation of Islam. Each claims to be following the Sunnah of the noble Messenger (pbuh). The tragedy is that each group also invariably excludes others they disagree with from being “true Sunnis.” A further problem is — and this has to do with semantics — the expression Ahl al-Sunnah wa’l Jama‘ah does not exist in the Qur’an or the authentic prophetic hadith. The first Umayyad king, Mu‘awiyah coined this expression to claim legitimacy for his rule, which had no basis in Islam.
[...]
Looks like more a George Soros' media tool working hand in hand with the mainstream media to attack China.
.
