What's new

Muslim Indians Should Demand A Seperate Nation:--

What you sow shall you reap. A year from now, the rhetoric of Intolerant Pakistan was taking air. India with all its might couldn't have fathomed that radicalization would eventually force herself to bite the dust. In our case, we know that a specific group is the culprit, how do you prevent something like this when every strata of society is the culprit. (it's corruption in Pakistan's case though which at the face of it isn't as bad as radicalization.)
 
It is not like I want to kill every muslim. I am just postulating as to what would happen if Muslims demand a separate state.

Every last one of them would be killed as it is doable.They could not even run an insurgency or civil war as they are not concentrated in a geographical enclave.



You obviously are TROLLING, but if that scenario ever develops you think the World will standby quietly.

While you are busy killing Muslims, they will not be sitting idle either, waiting to be slaughtered.

As this Civil war takes shape, Pakistan and maybe even Bangladesh will attack India.

In the end how many HINDUS and how many MUSLIMS are slaughtered , only time will tell.

But one thing is for sure, India will cease to exist as it stands today.
 
white people think constructive, they unite and help the weaker white country to prosper. the idea of getting better is by healthy competion and by being than other , not by distructing other. its pity that most of the south asian and arab nations don't think that way.

and pls bring no charts no sources to claim that india pakistan bangladesh afghanistan syria libya iran iraq are better than us and europe.
 
white people think constructive, they unite and help the weaker white country to prosper. the idea of getting better is by healthy competion and by being than other , not by distructing other. its pity that most of the south asian and arab nations don't think that way.

and pls bring no charts no sources to claim that india pakistan bangladesh afghanistan syria libya iran iraq are better than us and europe.

Hi,

It is just a matter of time pappy----sometimes your sh-it stinks worst than the other guys----.

Did you catholics think about that 550 years ago when you started on the destruction of the unknown world---you remember when you sent your Jesuit dogs out to hunt on the innocent the world over----.

How about if we give you Spaniards a payback---just please let us slaughter a 1/4 of your population as a payback---. Or simply if you let a 1/4 of your people cut their jugular vein with a sharp blade and die on their own---we would call it even---and then let us talk about progress after that.
 
white people think constructive, they unite and help the weaker white country to prosper. the idea of getting better is by healthy competion and by being than other , not by distructing other. its pity that most of the south asian and arab nations don't think that way.

and pls bring no charts no sources to claim that india pakistan bangladesh afghanistan syria libya iran iraq are better than us and europe.
Our countries are young compared to yours. I do recall both World Wars took place mostly on Europe.
 
Hi,

It is just a matter of time pappy----sometimes your sh-it stinks worst than the other guys----.

Did you catholics think about that 550 years ago when you started on the destruction of the unknown world---you remember when you sent your Jesuit dogs out to hunt on the innocent the world over----.

How about if we give you Spaniards a payback---just please let us slaughter a 1/4 of your population as a payback---. Or simply if you let a 1/4 of your people cut their jugular vein with a sharp blade and die on their own---we would call it even---and then let us talk about progress after that.
you see , slaughter is all you can think.
we live in present. pre historic time was barbaric.. it took a long time for humans to be civilized and peaceful. lets not get back where we came from. peace
 
you see , slaughter is all you can think.
we live in present. pre historic time was barbaric.. it took a long time for humans to be civilized and peaceful. lets not get back where we came from. peace

On a technicality, Doctor Sahib, it wasn't pre-historic. It was only five to six hundred years ago.
 
Our countries are young compared to yours. I do recall both World Wars took place mostly on Europe.
so youngster! take it as a lesson , dividing we didn't achieve anything. u can see the result of uniting.
 
you see , slaughter is all you can think.
we live in present. pre historic time was barbaric.. it took a long time for humans to be civilized and peaceful. lets not get back where we came from. peace

Really---you came and slaughtered us like there was no tomorrow----so why can't we give you a piece of your medicine---balance out the issue---and then tell you---okay---be peaceful now---.

So----if 1/4 is too high a number----how about 1/5th----. Civilized is a drama term by the brutal---that is where they want to hide behind---because the weak maybe getting stronger---.


And now when it is your turn to be butchered---you claim---oh we are so civilized right now----but only till you find a reason to kill again---.
 
You obviously are TROLLING, but if that scenario ever develops you think the World will standby quietly.

While you are busy killing Muslims, they will not be sitting idle either, waiting to be slaughtered.

As this Civil war takes shape, Pakistan and maybe even Bangladesh will attack India.

In the end how many HINDUS and how many MUSLIMS are slaughtered , only time will tell.

But one thing is for sure, India will cease to exist as it stands today.
What did the world do when Syrian civil war started or during the Yemen civil war did you Pakistanis go to the help of your beloved Umma.
You and @MastanKhan very well know if such a demand is ever made it will lead to partition 2.0 and this time there will be no Pakistan and Bangladesh to run to. There are more chances of Balochistan and Sindh break up than India breaking up so better put your own house in order before worrying about others.
 
On a technicality, Doctor Sahib, it wasn't pre-historic. It was only five to six hundred years ago.
you didn't get the point. I didn't mean it literally pre historic. anyways, I consider even 50 years a long period. your country , the whole world is not same compared to lets say 50 yrs ago.
 
Really---you came and slaughtered us like there was no tomorrow----so why can't we give you a piece of your medicine---balance out the issue---and then tell you---okay---be peaceful now---.

So----if 1/4 is too high a number----how about 1/5th----. Civilized is a drama term by the brutal---that is where they want to hide behind---because the weak maybe getting stronger---.


And now when it is your turn to be butchered---you claim---oh we are so civilized right now----but only till you find a reason to kill again---.

While I cordially detest your post - without disagreeing with its premises, it is the conclusion that I detest - I would like to agree with you about the amusing monopoly of virtue of some in the human race. Considering that until very, very recently, as late as the second half of the twentieth century, Ibero-Lusitanians were kicking the backside of brown and black people, I found that intervention very sanctimonious.
 
Back
Top Bottom